• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Youtube 和 TikTok 上有关牙齿矫正的信息对公众的口腔健康可靠吗?一项横断面比较研究。

Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):e349-e354. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.009
PMID:35470122
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare orthodontic videos uploaded to YouTube and TikTok, the two most popular video sharing platforms, and to determine which of these platforms has more reliable and higher quality videos.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

YouTube (www.YouTube.com) and Tiktok (www.tiktok.com) was searched for two search-terms: "Orthodontics" and "Orthodontic Treatment". Reliability and quality of the first 120 videos for each search-term was evaluated by social media video content evaluation tools: Global Quality Score (GQS) and Reliability Score (modified DISCERN tool).

RESULTS

While YouTube videos were more informative or sharing patient experiences, TikTok videos were almost purely entertainment oriented. Tiktok videos had lower reliability. YouTube videos were rated of higher quality than Tiktok videos. GQS mean values for Youtube and TikTok were 2.90 ± 1.35 and 2.23 ± 1.08 respectively; and reliability (DISCERN) values were 2.42 ± 1.70 and 1.27 ± 1.48 respectively. GQS median values for Youtube and TikTok were 3 and 2 respectively; and reliability (DISCERN) values were 2 and 1 respectively. Most of the uploaders in both platforms were professionals.

CONCLUSION

Neither YouTube videos nor Tiktok videos were found to be reliable or of good quality. Videos on YouTube were higher quality and more reliable than videos on TikTok. However, YouTube videos also contained unreliable information.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较上传至 YouTube 和 TikTok(两个最受欢迎的视频分享平台)的正畸视频,并确定这两个平台中哪个平台拥有更可靠且更高质量的视频。

材料与方法

在 YouTube(www.YouTube.com)和 TikTok(www.tiktok.com)上搜索两个搜索词:“Orthodontics”和“Orthodontic Treatment”。使用社交媒体视频内容评估工具(全球质量评分(GQS)和可靠性评分(改良的 DISCERN 工具)评估前 120 个每个搜索词视频的可靠性和质量。

结果

YouTube 视频更具信息性或分享患者经验,而 TikTok 视频几乎完全是娱乐性的。TikTok 视频的可靠性较低。YouTube 视频的质量评分高于 TikTok 视频。YouTube 和 TikTok 的 GQS 平均值分别为 2.90±1.35 和 2.23±1.08;可靠性(DISCERN)值分别为 2.42±1.70 和 1.27±1.48。YouTube 和 TikTok 的 GQS 中位数分别为 3 和 2;可靠性(DISCERN)值分别为 2 和 1。两个平台的大多数上传者都是专业人士。

结论

YouTube 视频和 TikTok 视频都不可靠或质量不高。YouTube 上的视频质量和可靠性均高于 TikTok 上的视频。然而,YouTube 视频也包含不可靠的信息。

相似文献

1
Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.Youtube 和 TikTok 上有关牙齿矫正的信息对公众的口腔健康可靠吗?一项横断面比较研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):e349-e354. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
How much information regarding gingival enlargement can we get from TikTok and YouTube?我们能从 TikTok 和 YouTube 上获取多少关于牙龈增生的信息?
Spec Care Dentist. 2024 Jul-Aug;44(4):1115-1125. doi: 10.1111/scd.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
3
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
4
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
5
TikTok and YouTube as sources of information on anal fissure: A comparative analysis.TikTok 和 YouTube 作为肛裂信息来源的比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;10:1000338. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000338. eCollection 2022.
6
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.
7
Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok.YouTube 和 TikTok 上治疗勃起功能障碍视频的横断面和对比分析。
Andrologia. 2022 Jun;54(5):e14392. doi: 10.1111/and.14392. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.TikTok 胆囊疾病相关视频信息质量:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.
9
Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as sources of information on gastric cancer: assessment and analysis of the content and quality.哔哩哔哩、抖音和 YouTube 作为胃癌信息来源:内容和质量评估与分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17323-x.
10
Orthodontic clear aligners and TikTok videos: A content, reliability and quality analysis.正畸透明矫治器与TikTok视频:内容、可靠性及质量分析
Int Orthod. 2022 Sep;20(3):100663. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100663. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality and reliability of prostate cancer-Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional content analysis study.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上前列腺癌相关视频的质量与可靠性:横断面内容分析研究
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 3;11:20552076251376263. doi: 10.1177/20552076251376263. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Comparison of YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram as digital sources for obtaining information about pulp therapy in primary and permanent teeth.比较YouTube、TikTok和Instagram作为获取有关乳牙和恒牙牙髓治疗信息的数字来源。
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;50(3):e26. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e26. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
3
"Do You Know What Birth Control Actually Does to Your Body?": Assessing Contraceptive Information on TikTok.
《你知道节育实际上对你的身体有什么影响吗?》:评估TikTok上的避孕信息。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70025.
4
Comparative Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Information on Popular Social Media Platforms.热门社交媒体平台上膝关节骨关节炎治疗信息的比较分析
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Jun 11;9(6). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00335. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
5
Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study.主流平台上儿科肺炎相关短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 23;25(1):1896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22963-2.
6
Information on TikTok About the Oncogenic Potential of HPV in the Head and Neck: Implications for Public Health.TikTok上关于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)对头颈部致癌潜力的信息:对公共卫生的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02614-1.
7
A Scoping Review of the Quality of Orthodontic Information on YouTube.YouTube 上正畸信息质量的范围综述。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Aug;28(4):605-626. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12913. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
8
Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis.中国抖音乳腺钼靶摄影短视频的评估:质量与可靠性分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 19;11:e59483. doi: 10.2196/59483.
9
Are YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos useful as educational tool for patients with cleft lip and palate?YouTube™和TikTok™视频对唇腭裂患者作为教育工具有用吗?
Dental Press J Orthod. 2025 Jan 13;29(6):e2424151. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.6.e2424151.oar. eCollection 2025.
10
The Use of Social Media on Enhancing Dental Care and Practice Among Dental Professionals: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.社交媒体在提升牙科专业人员的牙科护理与业务水平方面的应用:横断面调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 3;9:e66121. doi: 10.2196/66121.