Suppr超能文献

特发性复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)的诊断与管理:英国当前的免疫检测和免疫调节治疗实践。

Diagnosis and management of idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): Current immune testing and immunomodulatory treatment practice in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

University of Birmingham, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, United Kingdom; Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, United Kingdom.

Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, United Kingdom; Leeds General Teaching Hospital Trust, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Reprod Immunol. 2022 Sep;153:103662. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2022.103662. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects 1.9 % of couples. Despite the severe physical, psychological, and economic impact of RPL, miscarriage care provision remains highly heterogeneous. Due to the absence of strong scientific evidence, national and international guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of this condition remain unclear and often contradictory. In the absence of identifiable RPL-associated risk factors, when the condition is termed "idiopathic", immunological tests and immunomodulatory treatments are sometimes suggested even though the contribution of aberrant immune activity to this condition remains undetermined. Through an online survey, distributed across the UK (37.7% response rate), a high variation in clinical practice was detected, with multiple RPL definitions utilized and different tests employed for potential risk factor identification. Immunological testing was found to be provided in 7.9 %(N = 3) of the included clinics. Moreover, multiple therapies, including immunomodulatory ones were utilized for the management of idiopathic RPL. These findings highlight a need for additional research on the implication of immune activity in this condition. The high variation between clinics regarding the tests employed for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic RPL also underlines the need for guidelines to direct clinical practice, taking into consideration both the patients' needs but also the strength of the available scientific evidence.

摘要

复发性流产(RPL)影响 1.9%的夫妇。尽管 RPL 对身体、心理和经济造成严重影响,但流产护理的提供仍然高度异质化。由于缺乏强有力的科学证据,关于这种疾病的诊断和治疗的国家和国际指南仍然不明确,而且常常相互矛盾。在没有可识别的与 RPL 相关的风险因素的情况下,当这种情况被称为“特发性”时,有时会建议进行免疫测试和免疫调节治疗,尽管异常免疫活动对这种情况的贡献仍不确定。通过在英国(响应率为 37.7%)进行的在线调查,发现临床实践存在很大差异,多个 RPL 定义被使用,并且为潜在风险因素识别采用了不同的测试。在纳入的诊所中,有 7.9%(N=3)提供了免疫测试。此外,还采用了多种疗法,包括免疫调节疗法,来管理特发性 RPL。这些发现强调需要进一步研究免疫活性在这种情况下的影响。诊所之间在用于诊断和管理特发性 RPL 的测试方面存在很大差异,这也凸显了需要制定指南来指导临床实践,既要考虑到患者的需求,也要考虑到现有科学证据的强度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验