• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯型和混合型浸润性微乳头状乳腺癌的临床病理特征:单中心经验。

The Clinicopathological Characteristics of Pure and Mixed Invasive Micropapillary Breast Carcinomas: A Single Center Experience.

机构信息

Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Hospital, Muğla, Turkey.

Clinic of Medical Oncology, MKA Breast Cancer Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Balkan Med J. 2022 Jul 22;39(4):275-281. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2022.2022-4-7.

DOI:10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2022.2022-4-7
PMID:35872645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9326948/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a rare tumor of the breast. IMPC can be classified as a pure or mixed type based on the extent of micropapillary differentiation.

AIMS

To evaluate the prognostic importance of the IMPC component in breast cancer through retrospective comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of pure and mixed IMPC patients.

STUDY DESIGN

The data of 147 (2.2%) patients with IMPC among 6648 patients histopathologically diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between January 2000-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were assigned to two groups: pure IMPC and mixed IMPC.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features such as age at diagnosis, histological type, grade, size, and components of mixed carcinoma, the numbers of metastatic lymph nodes, presence of lymph vascular invasion, hormone receptor, and the Her-2 status of the tumor, T, N, M stages, and the survival rates were reviewed. The clinicopathologic features, patterns of failures, and survival rates were coded and compared between pure and mixed IMPC patients.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients (30.6%) had pure and 102 patients (69.4%) had mixed IMPC. The median follow-up time was 46 months (3-178). The progesterone receptor positivity rate was significantly lower in the pure group than in the mixed group (66.7% vs. 83.3%, p: 0.024). In the pure and mixed groups, respectively, the 5-year overall survival was 90% and 91% (p: 0.839); progression-free survival was 70% and 77% (p: 0.537); locoregional recurrence-free survival was 86% and 95% (p: 0.043); 5-year distant metastasis-free survival was 88% and 83% (p: 0.066), and the locoregional recurrence rate was 10.3% and 2% (p: 0.052).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the mixed IMPC, pure IMPC appears to have a more aggressive behavior with lower locoregional recurrence-free survival and more locoregional recurrences. This may be due to the low progesterone receptor positivity rate.

摘要

背景

浸润性微乳头状癌(IMPC)是一种罕见的乳腺肿瘤。根据微乳头状分化的程度,IMPC 可分为纯型或混合型。

目的

通过回顾性比较纯型和混合型 IMPC 患者的临床病理特征和临床结局,评估 IMPC 成分在乳腺癌中的预后意义。

研究设计

回顾性分析 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年期间经病理组织学诊断为浸润性乳腺癌的 6648 例患者中 147 例(2.2%)IMPC 患者的数据。将患者分为两组:纯型 IMPC 和混合型 IMPC。

方法

回顾分析患者的临床病理特征,如诊断时的年龄、组织学类型、分级、大小和混合癌成分、转移淋巴结数量、淋巴管血管侵犯、激素受体和肿瘤 Her-2 状态、T、N、M 分期以及生存率等。对纯型和混合型 IMPC 患者的临床病理特征、失败模式和生存率进行编码和比较。

结果

45 例(30.6%)患者为纯型,102 例(69.4%)患者为混合型 IMPC。中位随访时间为 46 个月(3-178)。孕激素受体阳性率在纯型组明显低于混合型组(66.7%比 83.3%,p:0.024)。在纯型和混合型组中,5 年总生存率分别为 90%和 91%(p:0.839);无进展生存率分别为 70%和 77%(p:0.537);局部区域无复发生存率分别为 86%和 95%(p:0.043);5 年远处无复发生存率分别为 88%和 83%(p:0.066),局部区域复发率分别为 10.3%和 2%(p:0.052)。

结论

与混合型 IMPC 相比,纯型 IMPC 似乎具有更具侵袭性的行为,局部区域无复发生存率较低,局部区域复发较多。这可能是由于孕激素受体阳性率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad7/9326948/7d81d29e80e4/BMJ-39-275-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad7/9326948/3dca42ad180a/BMJ-39-275-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad7/9326948/a82cef905d0f/BMJ-39-275-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad7/9326948/7d81d29e80e4/BMJ-39-275-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad7/9326948/3dca42ad180a/BMJ-39-275-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad7/9326948/a82cef905d0f/BMJ-39-275-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad7/9326948/7d81d29e80e4/BMJ-39-275-g7.jpg

相似文献

1
The Clinicopathological Characteristics of Pure and Mixed Invasive Micropapillary Breast Carcinomas: A Single Center Experience.单纯型和混合型浸润性微乳头状乳腺癌的临床病理特征:单中心经验。
Balkan Med J. 2022 Jul 22;39(4):275-281. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2022.2022-4-7.
2
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 103 cases of an unusual and highly aggressive variant of breast carcinoma.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌:一种不常见且高度侵袭性乳腺癌变体的临床病理研究。
Breast J. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):374-81. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12128. Epub 2013 May 29.
3
Long-term outcome of invasive pure micropapillary breast cancer compared with invasive mixed micropapillary and invasive ductal breast cancer: a matched retrospective study.浸润性单纯微乳头状乳腺癌与浸润性混合微乳头状和浸润性导管乳腺癌的长期预后比较:一项匹配的回顾性研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(2):333-347. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07422-7. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
4
Clinicopathologic study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌的临床病理研究
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(26):42455-42465. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16405.
5
[Comparison of prognosis between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: a single center, retrospective case-control study].乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌的预后比较:一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 1;56(1):56-60. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.01.013.
6
Differences in Prognostic Factors and Failure Patterns Between Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma and Carcinoma With Micropapillary Component Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study (KROG 13-06).乳腺浸润性微乳头癌、含微乳头成分的癌与浸润性导管癌之间预后因素及失败模式的差异:回顾性多中心病例对照研究(KROG 13-06)
Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Oct;15(5):353-61.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
[The comparison of characters between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified of the breast].[乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌与非特殊类型浸润性导管癌的特征比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 1;55(10):770-774. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.10.011.
8
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast has a better long-term survival than invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in spite of its aggressive clinical presentations: a comparison based on large population database and case-control analysis.尽管乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌临床表现具有侵袭性,但与乳腺浸润性导管癌相比,其长期生存率更高:基于大型人群数据库和病例对照分析的比较
Cancer Med. 2017 Dec;6(12):2775-2786. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1227. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
9
Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis among patients with pure invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with invasive micropapillary carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with ductal carcinoma in situ: A retrospective cohort study.单纯性浸润性导管癌、浸润性导管癌合并浸润性微乳头状癌以及浸润性导管癌合并导管原位癌患者的临床病理特征及预后比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 11;99(50):e23487. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023487.
10
Comparison of invasive micropapillary and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性微乳头癌与三阴性浸润性导管癌的比较。
Breast. 2015 Dec;24(6):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
An overview of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: past, present, and future.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌概述:过去、现在与未来
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 15;14:1435421. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1435421. eCollection 2024.
2
Predictive model of prognosis index for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast based on machine learning: a SEER population-based study.基于机器学习的乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌预后指数预测模型:一项 SEER 基于人群的研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02669-y.
3
The differences between pure and mixed invasive micropapillary breast cancer: the epithelial-mesenchymal transition molecules and prognosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in the clinicopathological characteristics of pure and mixed invasive micropapillary breast carcinomas from eastern China.中国东部地区纯型和混合型浸润性微乳头状乳腺癌临床病理特征的差异
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(5):412. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-8045.
2
Prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in breast: A meta-analysis of PSM studies.浸润性微乳头状癌与乳腺浸润性导管癌预后的比较:PSM 研究的荟萃分析。
Breast. 2020 Jun;51:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.041. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast had no difference in prognosis compared with invasive ductal carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis.
单纯型和混合型浸润性微乳头状乳腺癌的差异:上皮-间充质转化分子和预后。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(1):41-55. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07384-w. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
4
Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast With Solid Papillary Carcinoma: A Case Report.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌合并实性乳头状癌:一例报告
Cureus. 2023 Jun 3;15(6):e39928. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39928. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Awareness of Invasive Micropapillary Breast Carcinoma is an Essential Requirement.认识浸润性微乳头型乳腺癌是一项基本要求。
Balkan Med J. 2023 Mar 8;40(2):147-148. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2023.2023-1-33.
6
The significance of spread through air spaces in the prognostic assessment model of stage I lung adenocarcinoma and the exploration of its invasion mechanism.Ⅰ期肺腺癌预后评估模型中空气传播的意义及其侵袭机制的探索。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug;149(10):7125-7138. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04619-z. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌的预后与浸润性导管癌无差异:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36362-8.
4
The Impact of Micropapillary Component Ratio on the Prognosis of Patients With Invasive Micropapillary Breast Carcinoma.微乳头成分比例对浸润性微乳头型乳腺癌患者预后的影响
J Invest Surg. 2020 Jan;33(1):31-39. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1474302. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
The prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in the breast: a meta-analysis.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌的预后比较:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 11;17(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3855-7.
6
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast has a better long-term survival than invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in spite of its aggressive clinical presentations: a comparison based on large population database and case-control analysis.尽管乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌临床表现具有侵袭性,但与乳腺浸润性导管癌相比,其长期生存率更高:基于大型人群数据库和病例对照分析的比较
Cancer Med. 2017 Dec;6(12):2775-2786. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1227. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
7
Clinicopathologic study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌的临床病理研究
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(26):42455-42465. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16405.
8
Comparison of invasive micropapillary and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性微乳头癌与三阴性浸润性导管癌的比较。
Breast. 2015 Dec;24(6):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
9
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 103 cases of an unusual and highly aggressive variant of breast carcinoma.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌:一种不常见且高度侵袭性乳腺癌变体的临床病理研究。
Breast J. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):374-81. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12128. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
Prognostic markers for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a population-based analysis.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌的预后标志物:一项基于人群的分析。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2013 Apr;13(2):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.10.001.