• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于医生对优秀医生特质的经历和看法的定性研究

Qualitative Study of Medical Doctors on Their Experiences and Opinions of the Characteristics of Exceptionally Good Doctors.

作者信息

Schnelle Christoph, Jones Mark A

机构信息

Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, QLD, 4226, Australia.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Jul 17;13:717-731. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S370980. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S370980
PMID:35872967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9306288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is generally accepted that there is a therapist effect in psychotherapy, with master therapists being studied using qualitative methods. There are surgeons with exceptionally positive patients' physical health outcomes, and qualitative research on what makes good doctors. However, characteristics of exceptionally good doctors are less studied and understood.

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively study the opinions of physicians on exceptionally good doctors.

METHODS

Thirteen semi-structured interviews of English-speaking medical doctors of any specialty were conducted. Recruitment was achieved through the authors' network; contacting authors of relevant research papers; and Bond University's General Practitioner recruitment program. Their opinion was sought on what makes an exceptionally good doctor, whether they have met such a person, what was their experience of that person, and whether they consider themselves as exceptionally good doctors.

ANALYSIS

A six-phase thematic analysis in an experiential framework, as per Braun and Clarke, was implemented to identify themes and their details in an inductive approach with a realist epistemological position, ie, assuming truthful knowledge on what makes exceptionally good doctors can be obtained.

RESULTS

Each interviewee had met and been inspired by exceptionally good doctors. Descriptions covered six themes: character traits; other characteristics; patient relationships; peer and health care system relations; education; and treatment examples. Exceptionally good doctors were found to have up-to-date extensive medical knowledge and skills, relate well with patients, and have excellent diagnostic abilities. They tend to be humble, approachable, inspiring, and are long-remembered role models. However, they may not always be appreciated by their peers and their health care system because of their exceptional abilities.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Exceptional doctors are beneficial for their peers, their patients, and their health care system. Identifying, acknowledging, and making such doctors more accessible to medical students and junior doctors could have a positive impact on medical practice.

摘要

背景

心理治疗中存在治疗师效应,这一点已被广泛接受,目前正在使用定性方法对资深治疗师展开研究。有些外科医生能让患者的身体健康状况得到格外积极的改善,也有关于优秀医生特质的定性研究。然而,对于极为优秀的医生的特质,人们的研究和了解较少。

目的

定性研究医生对极为优秀的医生的看法。

方法

对13名各专业说英语的医生进行了半结构化访谈。通过作者的人脉网络、联系相关研究论文的作者以及邦德大学的全科医生招募计划来招募受访者。询问他们对于成为一名极为优秀的医生的要素、是否遇见过这样的人、对那个人的印象以及他们是否认为自己是极为优秀的医生的看法。

分析

按照布劳恩和克拉克的方法,在经验框架内进行了六个阶段的主题分析,以归纳法在现实主义认识论立场下确定主题及其细节,即假设能够获取关于极为优秀的医生特质的真实知识。

结果

每位受访者都遇见过极为优秀的医生并深受其启发。描述涵盖六个主题:性格特质;其他特征;医患关系;同行及医疗系统关系;教育;以及治疗实例。极为优秀的医生具备最新且广泛的医学知识和技能,与患者关系融洽,诊断能力出色。他们往往谦逊、平易近人、鼓舞人心,是令人铭记的榜样。然而,由于他们能力出众,同行和医疗系统可能并不总是欣赏他们。

讨论与结论

优秀的医生对同行、患者和医疗系统都有益处。识别、认可并让医学生和初级医生更容易接触到这样的医生,可能会对医疗实践产生积极影响。

相似文献

1
Qualitative Study of Medical Doctors on Their Experiences and Opinions of the Characteristics of Exceptionally Good Doctors.关于医生对优秀医生特质的经历和看法的定性研究
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Jul 17;13:717-731. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S370980. eCollection 2022.
2
Protocol for a Qualitative Study on Doctors' Opinions on and Experiences of Exceptionally Good Doctors.关于医生对优秀医生的看法和经历的定性研究方案
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Jan 26;13:103-109. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S343554. eCollection 2022.
3
Characteristics of Exceptionally Good Doctors: A Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey of Adults.优秀医生的特质:一项针对成年人的横断面调查方案
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Aug 12;13:181-188. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S376033. eCollection 2022.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Characteristics of exceptionally good Doctors-A survey of public adults.优秀医生的特质——一项针对成年公众的调查
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 21;9(2):e13115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13115. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.基层医疗中实施医生-护士替代策略的障碍与促进因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 15;4(4):CD010412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010412.pub2.
7
Is There a Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review.除干预措施和所有已知因素外,医生对患者身体健康是否有影响?一项系统评价。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Jul 21;18:721-737. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S372464. eCollection 2022.
8
'…the way it was staffed during COVID is the way it should be staffed in real life…': a qualitative study of the impact of COVID-19 on the working conditions of junior hospital doctors.“……在 COVID 期间的人员配备方式应该是现实生活中的人员配备方式……”:一项关于 COVID-19 对初级医院医生工作条件影响的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 9;11(8):e050358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050358.
9
Swedish doctors' experiences and personality regarding medical specialty choice: a qualitative study.瑞典医生在医学专业选择方面的经历与个性:一项定性研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2019 Feb 28;10:36-42. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5c60.1c63.
10
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of doctor-doctor relationships among academic and clinical staff at a university hospital, Cairo, Egypt: a mixed method study.埃及开罗某大学医院学术与临床工作人员之间医生-医生关系的决定因素:一项混合方法研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 24;25(1):1927. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23200-6.
2
"Just Treat Me Delicately": A Qualitative Exploration of What Works to Engage Australian Men in Health Care Encounters.“温柔地对待我”:关于促使澳大利亚男性参与医疗保健服务的有效方法的定性探索
Am J Mens Health. 2025 Mar-Apr;19(2):15579883241311557. doi: 10.1177/15579883241311557. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Characteristics of exceptionally good Doctors-A survey of public adults.优秀医生的特质——一项针对成年公众的调查
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 21;9(2):e13115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13115. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Characteristics of Exceptionally Good Doctors: A Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey of Adults.优秀医生的特质:一项针对成年人的横断面调查方案
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Aug 12;13:181-188. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S376033. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Is There a Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review.除干预措施和所有已知因素外,医生对患者身体健康是否有影响?一项系统评价。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Jul 21;18:721-737. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S372464. eCollection 2022.
2
The Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health Outcomes Beyond the Intervention: A Methodological Review.医生对患者干预之外身体健康结局的影响:一项方法学综述
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 18;14:851-870. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S357927. eCollection 2022.
3
Is There a Surgeons' Effect on Patients' Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention, That Requires Further Investigation? A Systematic Review.除了手术干预之外,外科医生对患者身体健康是否存在需要进一步研究的影响?一项系统评价。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Apr 26;18:467-490. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S357934. eCollection 2022.
4
Protocol for a Qualitative Study on Doctors' Opinions on and Experiences of Exceptionally Good Doctors.关于医生对优秀医生的看法和经历的定性研究方案
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Jan 26;13:103-109. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S343554. eCollection 2022.
5
Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members.保乳手术治疗癌症后再次手术的相关因素:美国乳腺外科学会成员的前瞻性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3321-3336. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07547-w. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
What is a good doctor?什么是好医生?
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2018 Nov;168(15-16):398-405. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
7
Systematic Review of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术的体积-结局关系的系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):775-789. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术中医院及外科医生手术量与治疗结果关系的系统评价与Meta分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Jun;8(3):534-546. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.25.
9
Evaluating Surgeon-Specific Performance for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.评估鼻窦内窥镜手术中外科医生的特定表现。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep 1;143(9):891-898. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0752.
10
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.