Schnelle Christoph, Jones Mark A
Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, QLD, 4226, Australia.
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 21;9(2):e13115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13115. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Systematic reviews have found that doctors can have a substantial effect on patients' physical health, beyond what can be explained by known factors. In a previous qualitative study, 13 medical doctors were interviewed on their experiences of exceptionally good doctors, and all had met at least one such doctor.
To determine how common it is for exceptionally good doctors to be encountered by patients and what are the characteristics of exceptionally good doctors.
Mixed methods cross-sectional survey of 580 Amazon Mechanical Turk participants. Questions included doctor and participant demographics, and 34 Likert questions on characteristics of exceptionally good and average doctors. Free-text questions allowed participants to describe exceptional doctors, record their experience, and provide survey feedback. Stratified sampling ensured gender parity and 33% of participants aged ≥55 years. Analysis included descriptive statistics, statistical modelling of associations between Likert scale scores and patient demographics, and factor analysis.
Of 580 responses, 505 (86%) were included in the analysis. Factor analysis confirmed internal validity. Most respondents (86%) had met at least two exceptionally good doctors, of whom 55% were specialists. 58% of respondents regarded doctors as exceptional based on an overall impression with multiple reasons. Doctors were most commonly considered exceptional based on one or more of their personality, diagnostic, or intervention ability. Respondents who reported the doctors "willingly listened to them to the end" scored their doctors higher on 33 of 34 Likert questions, except for popularity. They also rated average doctors lower throughout.
Exceptionally good doctors appear to be commonly encountered by the adult public. Listening to patients willingly to the end is a highly rated and influential characteristic, suggesting that listening could be targeted for quality improvement.
系统评价发现,医生对患者的身体健康有着重大影响,这超出了已知因素所能解释的范围。在之前的一项定性研究中,对13名医生进行了访谈,了解他们对优秀医生的看法,他们都至少遇到过一位这样的医生。
确定患者遇到优秀医生的普遍程度以及优秀医生的特征。
对580名亚马逊土耳其机器人平台参与者进行混合方法横断面调查。问题包括医生和参与者的人口统计学信息,以及34个关于优秀医生和普通医生特征的李克特量表问题。自由文本问题允许参与者描述优秀医生、记录他们的经历并提供调查反馈。分层抽样确保了性别均衡,且33%的参与者年龄≥55岁。分析包括描述性统计、李克特量表得分与患者人口统计学之间关联的统计建模以及因子分析。
在580份回复中,505份(86%)被纳入分析。因子分析证实了内部效度。大多数受访者(86%)至少遇到过两位优秀医生,其中55%是专科医生。58%的受访者基于多种原因形成的总体印象认为医生很优秀。医生最常因其个性、诊断或干预能力中的一项或多项而被认为优秀。那些表示医生“愿意从头到尾倾听他们”的受访者在34个李克特量表问题中的33个问题上给医生的评分更高,但受欢迎程度除外。他们对普通医生的评分也普遍较低。
成年公众似乎经常遇到优秀医生。愿意从头到尾倾听患者是一项评分很高且有影响力的特征,这表明倾听可以作为质量改进的目标。