Lebiecka Zofia, Skoneczny Tomasz, Tyburski Ernest, Samochowiec Jerzy, Jędrzejewski Adam, Wirtz Janina, Kühn Simone, Nielsen Anette Søgard, Mellentin Angelina Isabella, Michelis Leonie Ascone, Kucharska-Mazur Jolanta
Department of Psychiatry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Department of Health Psychology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 7;13:866657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.866657. eCollection 2022.
In the face of increasing social, economic, and health consequences of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and limited effects of available treatment options, the search for novel prevention and management methods continues to remain a timely and valid endeavor. This, however, requires a better grasp of the theoretical framework underlying addiction mechanisms. With the goal to extend the existing body of evidence on AUDs, we set out to investigate the effect of personality-related factors and depressive symptomatology on (i) impulsivity, (ii) cognitive response inhibition, and (iii) the links between the two measures of behavioral control (different facets of impulsivity and response inhibition) in a treatment-seeking AUD sample. To this end, 53 male ( = 45) and female ( = 8) inpatients at an alcohol rehabilitation center completed three self-report questionnaires: the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP-50), the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and performed one behavioral task-an alcohol go/no go task. Regression analyses revealed conscientiousness, intellect, and depression level to be important potential predictors of self-report impulsivity and processing speed in recovering drinkers. No significant links were observed between the two measures of behavioral control, thus complementing evidence that while they both encompass behavioral under-regulation, they may indeed represent distinct psychological constructs.
面对酒精使用障碍（AUDs）日益增加的社会、经济和健康后果以及现有治疗方案效果有限的情况，寻找新的预防和管理方法仍然是一项及时且有意义的工作。然而，这需要更好地理解成瘾机制背后的理论框架。为了扩展关于AUDs的现有证据，我们着手研究在寻求治疗的AUD样本中，与人格相关的因素和抑郁症状对（i）冲动性、（ii）认知反应抑制以及（iii）两种行为控制测量指标（冲动性的不同方面和反应抑制）之间联系的影响。为此，一家酒精康复中心的53名男性（n = 45）和女性（n = 8）住院患者完成了三份自我报告问卷：国际人格项目池（IPIP - 50）、贝克抑郁量表第二版（BDI - II）和巴拉特冲动性量表（BIS - 11），并执行了一项行为任务——酒精go/no go任务。回归分析显示，尽责性、智力和抑郁水平是康复饮酒者自我报告冲动性和处理速度的重要潜在预测因素。在两种行为控制测量指标之间未观察到显著联系，从而补充了相关证据，即虽然它们都包含行为调节不足，但它们可能确实代表不同的心理结构。
