Department of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Wuxi Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and the Second People's Hospital of Huai'an, Huai'an 223001, Jiangsu, China.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 4;2022:1174541. doi: 10.1155/2022/1174541. eCollection 2022.
Invasive breast cancer (IBC) is a kind of malignant tumor in which cancer cells have broken through the basement membrane of breast ducts or lobular acini and invaded the stroma. Although ultrasound elastography score (UES) has shown unique advantages in the diagnosis of IBC, its value in the prognosis is not clear. Here, we explored the correlation of UES with IBC and biological prognostic factors. The datum of 86 patients with suspected IBC from January 2018 to December 2021 was collected. UE was applied in the examination of all patients. The lesion tissue of the malignant group was punctured to detect and analyze the expression of biological prognostic factors, including estrogen receptor (E receptor), progesterone receptor (P receptor), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER factor 2) and Ki67. The differences in UES under different biological prognostic factors were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to analyze the diagnostic value of UES of IBC and the expression of biological prognostic factors. Based on the pathological diagnosis results, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of UES in the diagnosis of IBC were analyzed. The correlation of UES with IBC and biological prognostic factors was analyzed by multiple linear regression and Spearman method. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve of UES for diagnosing IBC and evaluating the expression of P receptor, HER factor 2, and Ki67 were 0.877, 0.704, 0.763, and 0.820, respectively (<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of UES when diagnosing IBC were 92.42%, 90.00%, 91.86%, 96.83%, and 78.26%, respectively. The UES of receptor expression (positive and negative group) showed no obvious variance ( > 0.05). The UES of P receptors (positive and negative), HER factor 2 (positive and negative), and Ki67 (high and low expression) showed obvious differences ( < 0.05). Multiple linear regression and Spearman indicated UES was significantly correlated with the expression of P receptor, HER factor 2, and Ki67 (<0.05). UES has a certain diagnostic value for IBC and is significantly correlated to the expression of P receptor, HER factor 2, and Ki67, which is helpful for evaluating the prognosis of patients with IBC.
浸润性乳腺癌(IBC)是一种恶性肿瘤,其中癌细胞已突破乳腺导管或小叶腺泡的基底膜并侵犯间质。尽管超声弹性成像评分(UES)在 IBC 的诊断中显示出独特的优势,但它在预后中的价值尚不清楚。在这里,我们探讨了 UES 与 IBC 和生物学预后因素的相关性。收集了 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月间 86 例疑似 IBC 患者的数据。对所有患者均应用 UE 进行检查。对恶性组的病变组织进行穿刺检测,并分析生物预后因素的表达,包括雌激素受体(E 受体)、孕激素受体(P 受体)、人表皮生长因子 2(HER 因子 2)和 Ki67。比较了不同生物学预后因素下 UES 的差异。应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析 UES 对 IBC 的诊断价值和生物预后因素的表达。基于病理诊断结果,分析 UES 对 IBC 的诊断的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。采用多元线性回归和 Spearman 法分析 UES 与 IBC 及生物预后因素的相关性。ROC 分析显示,UES 诊断 IBC 及评估 P 受体、HER 因子 2、Ki67 表达的曲线下面积分别为 0.877、0.704、0.763 和 0.820(<0.05)。UES 诊断 IBC 的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 92.42%、90.00%、91.86%、96.83%和 78.26%。受体表达(阳性和阴性组)的 UES 未见明显差异(>0.05)。P 受体(阳性和阴性)、HER 因子 2(阳性和阴性)、Ki67(高表达和低表达)的 UES 差异明显(<0.05)。多元线性回归和 Spearman 表明 UES 与 P 受体、HER 因子 2、Ki67 的表达显著相关(<0.05)。UES 对 IBC 具有一定的诊断价值,与 P 受体、HER 因子 2、Ki67 的表达显著相关,有助于评估 IBC 患者的预后。