NSW Department of Primary Industries, Trangie Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW, 2823, Australia.
NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, 1447 Forest Rd, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119146. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119146. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
The livestock industry accounts for a considerable proportion of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, and in response, the Australian red meat industry has committed to an aspirational target of net-zero emissions by 2030. Increasing soil carbon storage in grazing lands has been identified as one method to help achieve this, while also potentially improving production and provision of other ecosystem services. This review examined the effects of grazing management on soil carbon and factors that drive soil carbon sequestration in Australia. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was used to compare effects of stocking intensity (stocking rate or utilisation) and stocking method (i.e, continuous, rotational or seasonal grazing systems) on soil organic carbon, pasture herbage mass, plant growth and ground cover. Impacts on below ground biomass, soil nitrogen and soil structure are also discussed. Overall, no significant impact of stocking intensity or method on soil carbon sequestration in Australia was found, although lower stocking intensity and incorporating periods of rest into grazing systems (rotational grazing) had positive effects on herbage mass and ground cover compared with higher stocking intensity or continuous grazing. Minimal impact of grazing management on pasture growth rate and below-ground biomass has been reported in Australia. However, these factors improved with grazing intensity or rotational grazing in some circumstances. While there is a lack of evidence in Australia that grazing management directly increases soil carbon, this meta-analysis indicated that grazing management practices have potential to benefit the drivers of soil carbon sequestration by increasing above and below-ground plant production, maintaining a higher residual biomass, and promoting productive perennial pasture species. Specific recommendations for future research and management are provided in the paper.
畜牧业占农业温室气体排放的相当大比例,为此,澳大利亚红肉行业承诺到 2030 年实现净零排放的目标。增加放牧地的土壤碳储量已被确定为实现这一目标的一种方法,同时还有可能提高生产和提供其他生态系统服务的能力。本综述考察了放牧管理对土壤碳的影响,以及驱动澳大利亚土壤碳固存的因素。采用系统文献检索和荟萃分析比较了放牧强度(放牧率或利用率)和放牧方式(即连续、轮牧或季节性放牧系统)对土壤有机碳、牧草生物量、植物生长和地面覆盖的影响。还讨论了对地下生物量、土壤氮和土壤结构的影响。总体而言,没有发现放牧强度或方法对澳大利亚土壤碳固存有显著影响,但与高放牧强度或连续放牧相比,低放牧强度和在放牧系统中加入休息期(轮牧)对牧草生物量和地面覆盖有积极影响。在澳大利亚,放牧管理对牧草生长速度和地下生物量的影响很小。然而,在某些情况下,这些因素随着放牧强度或轮牧而改善。虽然没有证据表明放牧管理直接增加土壤碳,但本荟萃分析表明,放牧管理实践有可能通过增加地上和地下植物的生产力、保持更高的残留生物量以及促进有生产力的多年生牧草物种,从而有利于土壤碳固存的驱动因素。本文提供了未来研究和管理的具体建议。