• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤儿作物的机遇:生物技术带来的预期经济效益。

Opportunities for Orphan Crops: Expected Economic Benefits From Biotechnology.

作者信息

Zambrano Patricia, Wood-Sichra Ulrike, Ruhinduka Remidius D, Phillip Dayo, Nin Pratt Alejandro, Komen John, Kikulwe Enoch Mutebi, Falck Zepeda José, Dzanku Fred M, Chambers Judith A

机构信息

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.

Independent Researcher, Krems, Austria.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 23;13:825930. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.825930. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.825930
PMID:35873974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9297366/
Abstract

An enabling, evidence-based decision-making framework is critical to support agricultural biotechnology innovation, and to ensure farmers' access to genetically modified (GM) crops, including orphan crop varieties. A key element, and often a challenge in the decision-making process, involves the balancing of identified potential risks with expected economic benefits from GM crops. The latter is particularly challenging in the case of orphan crops, for which solid economic data is scarce. To address this challenge, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with local economists analyzed the expected economic benefits to farmers and consumers from the adoption of GM crops in 5 sub-Saharan African countries. This paper focuses on case studies involving insect-resistant cowpea in Nigeria and Ghana; disease-resistant cassava in Uganda and Tanzania; and disease-resistant banana in Uganda. Estimations from these case studies show substantial economic benefits to farmers and consumers from the timely adoption and planting in farmers' fields of GM orphan crops. Our analysis also shows how the benefits would significantly be reduced by regulatory or other delays that affect the timely release of these crops. These findings underscore the importance of having an enabling policy environment and regulatory system-covering, among other elements, biosafety and food/feed safety assessment, and varietal release registration-that is efficient, predictable, and transparent to ensure that the projected economic benefits are delivered and realized in a timely manner.

摘要

一个有利的、基于证据的决策框架对于支持农业生物技术创新以及确保农民能够获得转基因作物(包括小众作物品种)至关重要。一个关键要素,且往往是决策过程中的一项挑战,涉及到在已识别的潜在风险与转基因作物预期经济效益之间进行权衡。对于小众作物而言,这一挑战尤为艰巨,因为可靠的经济数据十分匮乏。为应对这一挑战,国际粮食政策研究所(IFPRI)与当地经济学家合作,分析了撒哈拉以南非洲5个国家采用转基因作物给农民和消费者带来的预期经济效益。本文重点关注尼日利亚和加纳抗虫豇豆、乌干达和坦桑尼亚抗病木薯以及乌干达抗病香蕉的案例研究。这些案例研究的估算结果表明,及时采用转基因小众作物并在农民田间种植,会给农民和消费者带来巨大的经济效益。我们的分析还表明,监管或其他方面的延误影响这些作物及时投放市场,会使效益大幅降低。这些研究结果凸显了营造有利的政策环境和监管体系的重要性,该体系除其他要素外,还涵盖生物安全和食品/饲料安全评估以及品种投放登记,要高效、可预测且透明,以确保预期的经济效益能够及时实现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/08289f361a95/fpls-13-825930-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/30152495f857/fpls-13-825930-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/45317599ec3a/fpls-13-825930-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/f2e8b07621d1/fpls-13-825930-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/08289f361a95/fpls-13-825930-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/30152495f857/fpls-13-825930-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/45317599ec3a/fpls-13-825930-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/f2e8b07621d1/fpls-13-825930-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d99/9297366/08289f361a95/fpls-13-825930-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Opportunities for Orphan Crops: Expected Economic Benefits From Biotechnology.孤儿作物的机遇:生物技术带来的预期经济效益。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 23;13:825930. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.825930. eCollection 2022.
2
Innovative farmers and regulatory gatekeepers: Genetically modified crops regulation and adoption in developing countries.创新型农民与监管把关者:发展中国家的转基因作物监管与采用情况
GM Crops Food. 2016 Jan 2;7(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1151989.
3
Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa.生物安全监管审查与操作空间:来自撒哈拉以南非洲的案例研究
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Mar 6;11:130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00130. eCollection 2020.
4
Tanzanian farmers' knowledge and attitudes to GM biotechnology and the potential use of GM crops to provide improved levels of food security. A Qualitative Study.坦桑尼亚农民对转基因生物技术的了解和态度,以及利用转基因作物提高粮食安全水平的潜力。一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 12;10:407. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-407.
5
Ex-Ante Economic Impact Assessment of Genetically Modified Banana Resistant to Xanthomonas Wilt in the Great Lakes Region of Africa.非洲大湖地区抗黄单胞菌枯萎病转基因香蕉的事前经济影响评估
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 28;10(9):e0138998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138998. eCollection 2015.
6
Commercial Release of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Interface Between Biosafety Regulatory Systems and Varietal Release Systems.非洲转基因作物的商业释放:生物安全监管系统与品种释放系统之间的接口
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 22;12:605937. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.605937. eCollection 2021.
7
Economic impacts of policies affecting crop biotechnology and trade.影响作物生物技术和贸易政策的经济影响。
N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 May 15.
8
Regulatory challenges for GM crops in developing economies: the African experience.发展中经济体转基因作物面临的监管挑战:非洲的经验
Transgenic Res. 2014 Dec;23(6):1049-55. doi: 10.1007/s11248-014-9805-0. Epub 2014 May 13.
9
Empirical analysis on the impact of trust in government, purposes of GM crops, and farmers' expectations on the delayed commercialization of GM crops in China---Based on Xinjiang and Guangdong survey samples.中国转生物商业化延迟的影响因素实证分析——基于政府信任、转生物目的认知和农民期望的视角---以新疆和广东两地调研样本为例。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2208996.
10
Genetically modified crops and small-scale farmers: main opportunities and challenges.转基因作物与小规模农户:主要机遇与挑战
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36(3):434-46. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.990413. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Consumer Perceptions and Safety of Genetically Modified Foods in Africa: A Comprehensive Review.评估非洲消费者对转基因食品的认知与安全性:一项全面综述
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jun 3;13(6):e4730. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4730. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The Adoption of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: the Public's Current Perception, the Regulatory Obstacles, and Ethical Challenges.非洲对转基因作物的采用:公众的当前看法、监管障碍和伦理挑战。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2345401. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Commercial Release of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Interface Between Biosafety Regulatory Systems and Varietal Release Systems.非洲转基因作物的商业释放:生物安全监管系统与品种释放系统之间的接口
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 22;12:605937. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.605937. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparing modeling approaches for assessing priorities in international agricultural research.比较用于评估国际农业研究重点的建模方法。
Res Eval. 2018;27(2):145-156. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvx044. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
3
Orphan crops: their importance and the urgency of improvement.
孤残作物:它们的重要性和改良的紧迫性。
Planta. 2019 Sep;250(3):677-694. doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03210-6. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
4
Identifying crop research priorities based on potential economic and poverty reduction impacts: The case of cassava in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.基于潜在经济和减贫影响识别作物研究重点:以非洲、亚洲和拉丁美洲的木薯为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 8;13(8):e0201803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201803. eCollection 2018.
5
Rationalizing governance of genetically modified products in developing countries.理顺发展中国家转基因产品的治理
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Feb 6;36(2):137-139. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4069.
6
Foregone benefits of important food crop improvements in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲重要粮食作物改良已错失的益处。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181353. eCollection 2017.
7
Investment, regulation, and uncertainty: managing new plant breeding techniques.投资、监管与不确定性:管理新型植物育种技术
GM Crops Food. 2014 Jan-Mar;5(1):44-57. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.27465. Epub 2013 Dec 20.