Crome Jennifer
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Aust Educ Res. 2022 Jul 16:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s13384-022-00550-3.
Force majeure circumstances, such as those witnessed in the COVID-19 pandemic, have been used to justify new technologies of governance as policy-makers around the world began to realise the magnitude of the problem and its political implications. In Australia, the coronavirus crisis focussed attention on the vital role education plays in society and was used as an opportunity by policy-makers to reinforce an agenda that, over the past two decades, has tied education policy-making to the economy and 'national interest'. Indeed, Australia's growing federal involvement, with respect to schooling policy was continued in the pandemic as the Australian Prime Minister (PM) created a national cabinet to deal with the crisis, consisting of the PM and state and territory leaders. However, despite the ongoing ambition of a national policy agenda pursued by federal policy-makers, fault lines appeared. Informed by Foucauldian notions of discourse, governmentality and biopolitics, this paper explores how Australia's federal Coalition government endeavoured to manage the population at the outset of the pandemic and subjectified teachers as responsible in the service of the economy. While COVID-19 was a crisis in search of a narrative, federal policy-makers experienced pushback as state and territory leaders assumed control and teachers refused subject positions.
不可抗力情况,如在新冠疫情中所目睹的那些情况,已被用来为新的治理技术提供正当理由,因为世界各地的政策制定者开始意识到问题的严重性及其政治影响。在澳大利亚,冠状病毒危机将人们的注意力集中到教育在社会中所起的关键作用上,政策制定者借此机会强化了一项议程,在过去二十年里,该议程已将教育政策制定与经济和“国家利益”联系起来。事实上,在疫情期间,澳大利亚联邦政府对学校教育政策的参与不断增加,澳大利亚总理组建了一个由总理以及州和领地领导人组成的国家内阁来应对危机。然而,尽管联邦政策制定者一直怀有推行国家政策议程的雄心,但分歧还是出现了。本文以福柯的话语、治理术和生命政治概念为依据,探讨澳大利亚联邦联合政府在疫情初期是如何努力管控民众,并将教师塑造为对经济有益的责任人的。虽然新冠疫情是一场需要寻找说辞的危机,但由于州和领地领导人掌控局面且教师拒绝接受被设定的角色,联邦政策制定者遭到了抵制。