Merritt Olivia A, Rowa Karen, Purdon Christine L
Psychology Department, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, N2L 3G1 Waterloo, ON Canada.
Anxiety Treatment and Research Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Cognit Ther Res. 2022;46(6):1157-1169. doi: 10.1007/s10608-022-10318-9. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
The close others (e.g., family members, romantic partners) of people with anxiety and related disorders are typically involved in their treatment decisions. However, we know little about close others' attitudes towards and concerns about their loved one starting cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT).
Study one surveyed close others of those with anxiety and related disorders (n = 33) about their concerns about their loved one starting CBT. Thematic coding was completed, and items were developed to reflect these themes, comprising a measure of treatment concerns in close others. Study two involved the administration of the novel measure to a larger sample (n = 287) to evaluate its structure, reliability, and validity.
Close others endorsed having treatment concerns of moderate intensity. The final 17-item measure, the Treatment Concerns QuestionnaireClose Others (TCQ-C), has a robust four-factor structure, with internally consistent subscales including "Adverse Reactions", "Personal/Family Consequences", "Lack of Commitment", and "Ineffectiveness". The measure shows moderate correlations with treatment expectations (convergent validity) and small correlations with respondent distress (discriminant validity).
The value of this measure for clinicians and future directions for research are discussed.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10608-022-10318-9.
焦虑症及相关障碍患者的亲密他人(如家庭成员、恋爱伴侣)通常会参与其治疗决策。然而,我们对亲密他人对其亲人开始认知行为疗法(CBT)的态度和担忧知之甚少。
研究一调查了焦虑症及相关障碍患者的亲密他人(n = 33)对其亲人开始接受CBT的担忧。完成了主题编码,并制定了反映这些主题的项目,构成了一种亲密他人治疗担忧的测量方法。研究二将这种新的测量方法应用于更大的样本(n = 287),以评估其结构、信度和效度。
亲密他人认可存在中等强度的治疗担忧。最终的17项测量工具,即亲密他人治疗担忧问卷(TCQ-C),具有稳健的四因素结构,其内部一致的子量表包括“不良反应”、“个人/家庭后果”、“缺乏承诺”和“无效性”。该测量工具与治疗期望呈中等相关性(聚合效度),与受访者痛苦呈小相关性(区分效度)。
讨论了该测量工具对临床医生的价值及未来研究方向。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10608-022-10318-9获取的补充材料。