Bakshi Apoorva, Srivastawa Surabhi, Jadon Ashok, Mohsin Khalid, Sinha Neelam, Chakraborty Swastika
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief Service, Tata Motors Hospital, Telco Colony, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;66(Suppl 4):S213-S219. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_88_22. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
Truncal blocks play an important role in multimodal analgesia regimens to manage the postoperative pain after lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). This study was aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) and thoracic erector spinae plane block (TESPB) in parturients of LSCS done under subarachnoid block (SAB).
In a randomised and double blind study, 60 parturients scheduled for LSCS under spinal anaesthesia were randomly divided into two equal groups: group E (n = 30) and group Q (n = 30). After surgery, each parturient received either US guided bilateral TQLB (group Q) or TESPB (group E) with 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone on each side. Assessments were done at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h. The primary objective was to compare the duration of analgesia (first request to rescue analgesia) and the secondary objectives were to compare pain scores [numerical rating score (NRS)], total amount of tramadol consumption, incidence of nausea-vomiting, parturient satisfaction and other adverse effects in 24 hours postoperatively.
The duration of analgesia (mean ± standard deviation) was comparable in group E (11.90 ± 2.49 h) and group Q (12.56 ± 3.38 h), P = 0.19. Pain scores (NRS) at rest and on movement were comparable at all time points of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h (P > 0.05). The amount of tramadol used was comparable in group E and group Q (P = 0.48).
TESPB and TQLB are equally efficacious to provide postoperative analgesia after LSCS done under SAB when used as a part of multimodal analgesia.
在多模式镇痛方案中,躯干阻滞对于处理下段剖宫产术(LSCS)后的术后疼痛起着重要作用。本研究旨在比较超声(US)引导下经肌腰方肌阻滞(TQLB)和胸椎竖脊肌平面阻滞(TESPB)在蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)下进行LSCS的产妇中的镇痛效果。
在一项随机双盲研究中,60例计划在脊髓麻醉下进行LSCS的产妇被随机分为两组,每组30例:E组(n = 30)和Q组(n = 30)。手术后,每位产妇接受超声引导下双侧TQLB(Q组)或TESPB(E组),每侧注射20 ml 0.375%罗哌卡因和4 mg地塞米松。在术后2、4、6、8、10、12和24小时进行评估。主要目标是比较镇痛持续时间(首次要求使用补救性镇痛的时间),次要目标是比较疼痛评分[数字评分量表(NRS)]、曲马多总消耗量、恶心呕吐发生率、产妇满意度以及术后24小时内的其他不良反应。
E组(11.90 ± 2.49小时)和Q组(12.56 ± 3.38小时)的镇痛持续时间(平均值±标准差)相当,P = 0.19。在2、4、6、8、10、12和24小时的所有时间点,静息和活动时的疼痛评分(NRS)相当(P > 0.05)。E组和Q组使用的曲马多量相当(P = 0.48)。
当作为多模式镇痛的一部分使用时,TESPB和TQLB在SAB下进行LSCS后提供术后镇痛的效果相当。