Suppr超能文献

烦躁不安中隐蔽与公开情绪面孔加工的时空动态

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert vs. Overt Emotional Face Processing in Dysphoria.

作者信息

Jaspers-Fayer Fern, Maffei Antonio, Goertzen Jennifer, Kleffner Killian, Coccaro Ambra, Sessa Paola, Liotti Mario

机构信息

Laboratory for Affective and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jul 5;16:920989. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.920989. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

People at risk of developing clinical depression exhibit attentional biases for emotional faces. To clarify whether such effects occur at an early, automatic, or at a late, deliberate processing stage of emotional processing, the present study used high-density electroencephalography during both covert and overt processing of sad, fearful, happy, and neutral expressions in healthy participants with high dysphoria ( = 16) and with low dysphoria ( = 19). A state-of-the-art non-parametric permutation-based statistical approach was then used to explore the effects of emotion, attentional task demands, and group. Behaviorally, participants responded faster and more accurately when overtly categorizing happy faces and they were slower and less accurate when categorizing sad and fearful faces, independent of the dysphoria group. Electrophysiologically, in an early time-window (N170: 140-180 ms), there was a significant main effect for the dysphoria group, with greater negative voltage for the high vs. low dysphoria group over the left-sided temporo-occipital scalp. Furthermore, there was a significant group by emotional interaction, with the high dysphoria group displaying greater negative amplitude N170 for happy than fearful faces. Attentional task demands did not influence such early effects. In contrast, in an intermediate time-window (EPN: 200-400 ms) and in a late time-window (LPP: 500-750 ms) there were no significant main effects nor interactions involving the dysphoria Group. The LPP results paralleled the behavioral results, with greater LPP voltages for sad and fearful relative to happy faces only in the overt task, but similarly so in the two dysphoria groups. This study provides novel evidence that alterations in face processing in dysphoric individuals can be seen at the early stages of face perception, as indexed by the N170, although not in the form of a typical pattern of mood-congruent attentional bias. In contrast, intermediate (EPN) and late (LPP) stages of emotional face processing appear unaffected by dysphoria. Importantly, the early dysphoria effect appears to be independent of the top-down allocation of attention, further supporting the idea that dysphoria may influence a stage of automatic emotional appraisal. It is proposed that it may be a consequence of a shift from holistic to feature-based processing of facial expressions, or may be due to the influence of negative schemas acting as a negative context for emotional facial processing.

摘要

有患临床抑郁症风险的人对情绪化面孔表现出注意偏向。为了阐明这种效应是在情绪加工的早期、自动阶段还是晚期、刻意加工阶段出现,本研究在高烦躁不安组(= 16)和低烦躁不安组(= 19)的健康参与者对悲伤、恐惧、快乐和中性表情进行隐蔽和公开加工期间,使用了高密度脑电图技术。然后采用一种基于非参数置换的先进统计方法来探究情绪、注意任务需求和组别的效应。行为上,参与者在公开对快乐面孔进行分类时反应更快且更准确,而在对悲伤和恐惧面孔进行分类时反应更慢且准确性更低,这与烦躁不安组无关。电生理方面,在早期时间窗口(N170:140 - 180毫秒),烦躁不安组存在显著的主效应,高烦躁不安组在左侧颞枕头皮上的负电压比低烦躁不安组更大。此外,存在显著的组别与情绪交互作用,高烦躁不安组对快乐面孔显示出比对恐惧面孔更大的负振幅N170。注意任务需求并未影响这种早期效应。相比之下,在中间时间窗口(EPN:200 - 400毫秒)和晚期时间窗口(LPP:500 - 750毫秒),不存在涉及烦躁不安组的显著主效应或交互作用。LPP结果与行为结果一致,仅在公开任务中悲伤和恐惧面孔相对于快乐面孔有更大的LPP电压,但在两个烦躁不安组中情况类似。本研究提供了新的证据,即如通过N170所表明的,烦躁不安个体在面孔加工上的改变可以在面孔感知的早期阶段看到,尽管不是以典型的情绪一致注意偏向模式的形式。相比之下,情绪面孔加工的中间(EPN)和晚期(LPP)阶段似乎不受烦躁不安的影响。重要的是,早期烦躁不安效应似乎独立于自上而下的注意分配,进一步支持了烦躁不安可能影响自动情绪评估阶段的观点。有人提出,这可能是面部表情从整体加工向基于特征的加工转变的结果,或者可能是消极图式作为情绪面部加工的消极背景产生影响的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfe/9296982/567ae47421ba/fnbeh-16-920989-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验