Parise Lyonna F, Parise Eric M, Sial Omar K, Bolaños-Guzmán Carlos A
Fishberg Department of Neuroscience, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2022 Jul 19;6:24705470221111094. doi: 10.1177/24705470221111094. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
Individuals who experience emotional, physical, or sexual abuse as children suffer from higher rates of major depressive disorder, drug abuse, and suicide. Early life interventions such as peer support groups can be beneficial to adolescents who experience trauma, suggesting that social support is important in facilitating rehabilitation and promoting resiliency to stress. Although there are some animal paradigms that can model how peer-peer interactions influence stress-reactivity, less is known about how individual stress experiences influence the effectiveness of social buffering.
The vicarious social defeat stress (VSDS) paradigm allows for the assessment of two different stress modalities, physical (PS) and emotional (ES) stress, which confer different levels of stress with similar biological and behavioral outcomes. Using a modified VSDS paradigm in which pairs of mice experience ES and PS together we can begin to evaluate how stress exposure influences the buffering efficacy of social relationships. Adolescent mice (postnatal day 35) were randomly combined into dyads and were allocated into either mutual experience or cohabitation pairs. Within each dyad, one mouse was assigned to the physically stressed (PS) condition and was repeatedly exposed to an aggressive CD1 mouse while the other mouse was designated as the partner. In the mutual experience dyads the partner mice witnessed the defeat bout (ES) while in the cohabitation dyads the partner was separated from the PS mouse and returned after the 10 min defeat bout was terminated (non-stressed). After 10 days of defeat, mice were tested in the social interaction test (SIT), the elevated plus maze (EPM), and the forced swim test (FST).
PS-exposed mice in the cohabitation dyads, but not those in the mutual experience dyads, showed significantly more avoidance of a novel CD1 aggressor or c57BL/6 mouse, in the SIT. Surprisingly, both partner conditions showed avoidance to a CD1. Interestingly, non-stressed partner mice spent less time in the open arms of the EPM, suggesting increased anxiety; only PS-exposed mice in cohabitation dyads showed more time spent immobile in the FST, indicative of increased learned helplessness.
These data suggest that the efficacy of social buffering can be mediated by individual stress experience.
童年时期遭受情感、身体或性虐待的个体患重度抑郁症、药物滥用和自杀的比例更高。诸如同伴支持小组等早期生活干预措施可能对经历创伤的青少年有益,这表明社会支持对于促进康复和增强抗压能力很重要。虽然有一些动物模型可以模拟同伴间的互动如何影响应激反应,但对于个体应激经历如何影响社会缓冲的效果却知之甚少。
替代性社会挫败应激(VSDS)模型允许评估两种不同的应激模式,即身体应激(PS)和情感应激(ES),这两种应激模式会带来不同程度的应激,但具有相似的生物学和行为结果。使用改良的VSDS模型,其中成对的小鼠一起经历ES和PS,我们可以开始评估应激暴露如何影响社会关系的缓冲效果。将青春期小鼠(出生后第35天)随机配对并分为共同经历组或同居组。在每个配对中,一只小鼠被分配到身体应激(PS)组,并反复暴露于一只具有攻击性的CD1小鼠面前,而另一只小鼠被指定为同伴。在共同经历组中,同伴小鼠目睹挫败过程(ES),而在同居组中,同伴在10分钟的挫败过程结束后(无应激)与PS小鼠分开然后返回。经过10天的挫败后,对小鼠进行社会互动测试(SIT)、高架十字迷宫(EPM)和强迫游泳测试(FST)。
在社会互动测试中,同居组中经历PS的小鼠,而非共同经历组中的小鼠,对新的CD1攻击者或C57BL/6小鼠表现出明显更多的回避行为。令人惊讶的是,两种同伴条件下的小鼠都对CD1表现出回避。有趣的是,无应激的同伴小鼠在高架十字迷宫的开放臂中停留的时间较少,表明焦虑增加;只有同居组中经历PS的小鼠在强迫游泳测试中表现出更多时间不动,表明习得性无助增加。
这些数据表明,社会缓冲的效果可能由个体应激经历介导。