Kobrlová Lucie, Duchoslav Martin, Hroneš Michal
Plant Biosystematics & Ecology RG, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
AoB Plants. 2022 Jun 21;14(4):plac028. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plac028. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Polyploidization is generally considered to be an important evolutionary driver affecting the genetic diversity, that can alter the morphology, phenology, physiology or ecology of plants, which in turn may make the taxonomy of polyploids more difficult. One such example is the complex, a polyploid species group represented by three major cytotypes: tetraploids (2 = 48), less common, geographically restricted diploids (2 = 24) and hypotetraploids (2 = 40). In most European floras only one polymorphic species, , is widely recognized, while the particular cytotypes are usually considered conspecific. Our study provided a thorough evaluation of the ploidy level diversity, morphological and ecological variation, with a special attempt to clarify the status of 'white-flowered' diploids. Using flow cytometry, we identified three cytotypes: widespread tetraploids (76.1 %); less frequent diploids (23.6 %) with scattered distribution across the range of tetraploids and confined only to several areas of Europe; and extremely rare triploids (0.3 %). Diploids and tetraploids showed diffuse parapatric pattern of distribution, with only four mixed-cytotype populations (2.7 %) found, but almost entirely without triploids, suggesting reproductive isolation between di- and tetraploids. Niche of diploids falls nearly completely within the niche of tetraploids that showed niche expansion. Tetraploids also showed a shift in niche optimum towards a less continental and colder climate, coupled with expansion to more disturbance-prone sites with higher nutrient availability. Diploids were clearly distinguishable morphologically from tetraploids. The morphological differentiation of studied cytotypes appears to be taxonomically significant, especially in combination with ecological differences and the apparent presence of hybridization barriers. Both cytotypes should be treated as separate species (i.e. and s. str.).
多倍体化通常被认为是影响遗传多样性的重要进化驱动力,它可以改变植物的形态、物候、生理或生态,这反过来可能会使多倍体的分类更加困难。一个这样的例子是 复合体,这是一个多倍体物种组,由三种主要细胞型代表:四倍体(2n = 48)、不太常见且地理分布受限的二倍体(2n = 24)和亚四倍体(2n = 40)。在大多数欧洲植物区系中,只有一个多态物种, ,被广泛认可,而特定的细胞型通常被认为是同种的。我们的研究对倍性水平多样性、形态和生态变异进行了全面评估,特别试图阐明“白花”二倍体的地位。使用流式细胞术,我们鉴定出三种细胞型:广泛分布的四倍体(76.1%);分布频率较低的二倍体(23.6%),其分布分散在四倍体分布范围内,仅局限于欧洲的几个地区;以及极其罕见的三倍体(0.3%)。二倍体和四倍体呈现出扩散的邻域分布模式,仅发现四个混合细胞型种群(2.7%),但几乎完全没有三倍体,这表明二倍体和四倍体之间存在生殖隔离。二倍体的生态位几乎完全落在显示出生态位扩张的四倍体的生态位内。四倍体还表现出生态位最适值向大陆性较弱和较寒冷气候的转变,同时向营养可用性较高、更容易受到干扰的地点扩张。二倍体在形态上与四倍体明显可区分。所研究细胞型的形态分化在分类学上似乎具有重要意义,特别是结合生态差异和明显存在的杂交障碍。两种细胞型都应被视为独立的物种(即 和 狭义)。