Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;10:891103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.891103. eCollection 2022.
Access to patients' documented medical information is necessary for building the informational continuity across different healthcare providers (HCP), particularly for patients with non-communicable diseases (NCD). Patient-held health records (PHR) such as NCD notebooks have important documented medical information, which can contribute to informational continuity in the outpatient settings for patients with diabetes and hypertension in Kerala. We aimed to use the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to identify the perceived HCP factors influencing informational and management continuity for patients with diabetes and hypertension.
We re-analyzed semi-structured interview data for 17 HCPs with experience in the NCD programme in public health facilities in Kerala from a previous study, using the TDF. The previous study explored patients, carers and HCPs experiences using PHRs such as NCD notebooks in the management of diabetes and hypertension. Interview transcripts were deductively coded based on a coding framework based on the 14 domains of TDF. Specific beliefs were generated from the data grouped into the domains.
Data were coded into the 14 domains of TDF and generated 33 specific beliefs regarding maintaining informational and management continuity of care. Seven domains were judged to be acting as facilitators for recording in PHRs and maintaining continuity. The two domains "memory, attention and decision process" and "environmental context and resources" depicted the barriers identified by HCPs for informational continuity of care.
In this exploration of recording and communicating patients' medical information in PHRs for patients with diabetes and hypertension, HCPs attributions of sub-optimal recording were used to identify domains that may be targeted for further development of supporting intervention. Overall, nine domains were likely to impact the barriers and facilitators for HCPs in recording in PHRs and communicating; subsequently maintaining informational and management continuity of care. This study showed that many underlying beliefs regarding informational continuity of care were based on HCPs' experiences with patient behaviors. Further research is needed for developing the content and appropriate support interventions for using PHRs to maintain informational continuity.
获取患者的有记载医疗信息对于在不同医疗保健提供者(HCP)之间建立信息连续性是必要的,特别是对于患有非传染性疾病(NCD)的患者。患者持有的健康记录(PHR),如 NCD 笔记本,具有重要的有记载医疗信息,这有助于在喀拉拉邦的糖尿病和高血压患者的门诊环境中实现信息连续性。我们旨在使用理论领域框架(TDF)来确定影响糖尿病和高血压患者信息和管理连续性的感知 HCP 因素。
我们从之前的研究中重新分析了 17 名在喀拉拉邦公共卫生设施中具有 NCD 项目经验的 HCP 的半结构化访谈数据,使用 TDF。之前的研究探讨了患者、照顾者和 HCP 使用 NCD 笔记本等 PHR 在糖尿病和高血压管理中的经验。访谈记录根据基于 TDF 的 14 个领域的编码框架进行了演绎编码。从数据中生成了特定的信念,并将其分组到各个领域中。
数据被编码到 TDF 的 14 个领域,并生成了 33 个关于维护信息和管理连续性的特定信念。有七个领域被认为是记录在 PHR 中并保持连续性的促进因素。两个领域“记忆、注意力和决策过程”和“环境背景和资源”描述了 HCP 为信息连续性识别的障碍。
在探索用于糖尿病和高血压患者的 PHR 中记录和交流患者医疗信息的过程中,HCP 对记录不佳的归因用于确定可能成为支持干预进一步发展的目标领域。总体而言,有九个领域可能会影响 HCP 在 PHR 中记录和交流的障碍和促进因素,从而维持信息和管理连续性。这项研究表明,许多关于信息连续性的信念都是基于 HCP 对患者行为的经验。需要进一步研究,为使用 PHR 维持信息连续性开发内容和适当的支持干预措施。