• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行人的异常行为:是冒险赌博还是仅仅针对自动驾驶汽车?社会控制又如何?

Deviant Behavior of Pedestrians: A Risk Gamble or Just Against Automated Vehicles? How About Social Control?

作者信息

Şahin Hatice, Hemesath Sebastian, Boll Susanne

机构信息

Media Informatics and Multimedia Systems Group, Department of Computing Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Institute for Social Sciences, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2022 Jul 8;9:885319. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.885319. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2022.885319
PMID:35875705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9304697/
Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the assumed conflict-avoidant programming of autonomous vehicles will incentivize pedestrians to bully them. However, this frequent argument disregards the embedded nature of social interaction. Rule violations are socially sanctioned by different forms of social control, which could moderate the rational incentive to abuse risk-avoidant vehicles. Drawing on a gamified virtual reality (VR) experiment ( = 36) of urban traffic scenarios, we tested how vehicle type, different forms of social control, and monetary benefit of rule violations affect pedestrians' decision to jaywalk. In a second step, we also tested whether differences in those effects exist when controlling for the risk of crashes in conventional vehicles. We find that individuals do indeed jaywalk more frequently when faced with an automated vehicle (AV), and this effect largely depends on the associated risk and not their automated nature. We further show that social control, especially in the form of formal traffic rules and norm enforcement, can reduce jaywalking behavior for any vehicle. Our study sheds light on the interaction dynamics between humans and AVs and how this is influenced by different forms of social control. It also contributes to the small gamification literature in this human-computer interaction.

摘要

最近的证据表明,自动驾驶汽车所假定的避免冲突程序会促使行人欺负它们。然而,这种常见的观点忽视了社会互动的内在本质。违规行为会受到不同形式社会控制的社会制裁,这可能会缓和滥用避险车辆的理性动机。基于一项城市交通场景的游戏化虚拟现实(VR)实验( = 36),我们测试了车辆类型、不同形式的社会控制以及违规行为的金钱收益如何影响行人乱穿马路的决定。在第二步中,我们还测试了在控制传统车辆碰撞风险时,这些影响是否存在差异。我们发现,当面对自动驾驶汽车(AV)时,个人确实更频繁地乱穿马路,而且这种影响很大程度上取决于相关风险,而非其自动驾驶的特性。我们进一步表明,社会控制,尤其是以正式交通规则和规范执行的形式,可以减少任何车辆的乱穿马路行为。我们的研究揭示了人类与自动驾驶汽车之间的互动动态,以及这是如何受到不同形式社会控制影响的。它也为这一人机交互领域中少量的游戏化文献做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Deviant Behavior of Pedestrians: A Risk Gamble or Just Against Automated Vehicles? How About Social Control?行人的异常行为:是冒险赌博还是仅仅针对自动驾驶汽车?社会控制又如何?
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jul 8;9:885319. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.885319. eCollection 2022.
2
Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles: Role of Traffic Signal and AV Driving Behavior.行人对自动驾驶车辆的信任:交通信号和自动驾驶车辆驾驶行为的作用。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Nov 28;6:117. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00117. eCollection 2019.
3
Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions.行人为配备 eHMI 的自动驾驶车辆在分隔和混合交通条件下的过街行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107115. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107115. Epub 2023 May 18.
4
One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective.一种解决方案适用于所有情况吗?从行人角度评估基于灯光的外部人机界面针对不同尺寸自动驾驶车辆的不同通信策略。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jun;171:106641. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106641. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Young and older adult pedestrians' behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars.年轻和年长的成年行人在传统汽车和自动驾驶汽车前过马路时的行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106256. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106256. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Toward a Holistic Communication Approach to an Automated Vehicle's Communication With Pedestrians: Combining Vehicle Kinematics With External Human-Machine Interfaces for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles.迈向自动驾驶车辆与行人通信的整体通信方法:将车辆运动学与不同尺寸自动驾驶车辆的外部人机界面相结合。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:882394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882394. eCollection 2022.
7
Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians.向行人传达自动驾驶车辆的意图。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 7;9:1336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01336. eCollection 2018.
8
Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians: An Experimental Study Using Virtual Reality.自动驾驶车辆与行人之间的通信:使用虚拟现实的实验研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;23(3):1049. doi: 10.3390/s23031049.
9
Mining patterns of autonomous vehicle crashes involving vulnerable road users to understand the associated factors.挖掘涉及弱势道路使用者的自动驾驶汽车事故模式,以了解相关因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Feb;165:106473. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106473. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
10
Impacts of enforcement cameras on pedestrians' risk perception and drivers' behaviors at non-signalized crosswalks.执法相机对非信号交叉口行人和驾驶员行为的影响。
J Safety Res. 2022 Jun;81:313-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Young and older adult pedestrians' behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars.年轻和年长的成年行人在传统汽车和自动驾驶汽车前过马路时的行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106256. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106256. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles: Role of Traffic Signal and AV Driving Behavior.行人对自动驾驶车辆的信任:交通信号和自动驾驶车辆驾驶行为的作用。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Nov 28;6:117. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00117. eCollection 2019.
3
External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions.
自动驾驶车辆外部人机界面:对行人穿越决策的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Dec;61(8):1353-1370. doi: 10.1177/0018720819836343. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
4
Red-light running behavior of cyclists in Italy: An observational study.意大利自行车闯红灯行为:一项观察性研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:219-232. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research.虚拟现实在行人安全研究中的功效。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:449-460. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
6
Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.行人-驾驶员在有标记的交叉口的沟通和决策策略。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.018.
7
Using a Virtual Environment to Study Pedestrian Behaviors: How Does Time Pressure Affect Children's and Adults' Street Crossing Behaviors?使用虚拟环境研究行人行为:时间压力如何影响儿童和成人的过街行为?
J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Aug;40(7):697-703. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv019. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
8
Visual timing and adaptive behavior in a road-crossing simulation study.过马路模拟研究中的视觉计时与适应性行为
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 May;37(3):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.12.002. Epub 2005 Jan 15.
9
Drivers' speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study.斑马线处驾驶员的速度行为:一项案例研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 1998 Nov;30(6):731-43. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(98)00026-8.