• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

憩室炎的多基因风险预测。

Polygenic Risk Prediction in Diverticulitis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):e1262-e1268. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005623. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005623
PMID:35876359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10874245/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To derive and validate a polygenic risk score (PRS) to predict the occurrence and severity of diverticulitis and to understand the potential for incorporation of a PRS in current decision-making.

BACKGROUND

PRS quantifies genetic variation into a continuous measure of risk. There is a need for improved risk stratification to guide surgical decision-making that could be fulfilled by PRS. It is unknown how surgeons might integrate PRS in decision-making.

METHODS

We derived a PRS with 44 single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with diverticular disease in the UK Biobank and validated this score in the Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI). We performed a discrete choice experiment of practicing colorectal surgeons. Surgeons rated the influence of clinical factors and a hypothetical polygenic risk prediction tool.

RESULTS

Among 2812 MGI participants with diverticular disease, 1964 were asymptomatic, 574 had mild disease, and 274 had severe disease. PRS was associated with occurrence and severity. Patients in the highest PRS decile were more likely to have diverticulitis [odds ratio (OR)=1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-2.38)] and more likely to have severe diverticulitis (OR=1.61; 95% CI, 1.04-2.51) than the bottom 50%. Among 213 surveyed surgeons, extreme disease-specific factors had the largest utility (3 episodes in the last year, +74.4; percutaneous drain, + 69.4). Factors with strongest influence against surgery included 1 lifetime episode (-63.3), outpatient management (-54.9), and patient preference (-39.6). PRS was predicted to have high utility (+71).

CONCLUSIONS

A PRS derived from a large national biobank was externally validated, and found to be associated with the incidence and severity of diverticulitis. Surgeons have clear guidance at clinical extremes, but demonstrate equipoise in intermediate scenarios. Surgeons are receptive to PRS, which may be most useful in marginal clinical situations. Given the current lack of accurate prognostication in recurrent diverticulitis, PRS may provide a novel approach for improving patient counseling and decision-making.

摘要

目的

推导并验证一种多基因风险评分(PRS),以预测憩室炎的发生和严重程度,并了解将 PRS 纳入当前决策的潜力。

背景

PRS 将遗传变异量化为风险的连续衡量标准。需要改进风险分层来指导可能通过 PRS 实现的手术决策。尚不清楚外科医生如何将 PRS 纳入决策。

方法

我们使用英国生物银行中与憩室疾病相关的 44 个单核苷酸多态性推导了一个 PRS,并在密歇根基因组倡议(MGI)中对该评分进行了验证。我们对进行了结肠直肠外科医生的离散选择实验。外科医生对临床因素和假设的多基因风险预测工具的影响进行了评分。

结果

在 2812 名患有憩室疾病的 MGI 参与者中,1964 名无症状,574 名轻度疾病,274 名患有严重疾病。PRS 与发病和严重程度相关。PRS 最高十分位数的患者更有可能患憩室炎[比值比(OR)=1.84;95%置信区间(CI),1.42-2.38)],并且更有可能患有严重憩室炎(OR=1.61;95%CI,1.04-2.51) 比底部 50%。在接受调查的 213 名外科医生中,极端疾病特异性因素具有最大的效用(过去一年中 3 次发作,+74.4;经皮引流,+69.4)。对手术影响最大的因素包括 1 次终生发作(-63.3)、门诊治疗(-54.9)和患者偏好(-39.6)。PRS 预计将具有较高的效用(+71)。

结论

从大型国家生物库中推导的 PRS 经过外部验证,与憩室炎的发生和严重程度相关。外科医生在临床极端情况下有明确的指导,但在中间情况下表现出均衡。外科医生对 PRS 持接受态度,这可能在边缘临床情况下最有用。鉴于目前在复发性憩室炎中缺乏准确的预后预测,PRS 可能为改善患者咨询和决策提供一种新方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb7/10874245/2c7cc2c48cba/nihms-1822528-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb7/10874245/28095e1e99a6/nihms-1822528-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb7/10874245/2c7cc2c48cba/nihms-1822528-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb7/10874245/28095e1e99a6/nihms-1822528-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb7/10874245/2c7cc2c48cba/nihms-1822528-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Polygenic Risk Prediction in Diverticulitis.憩室炎的多基因风险预测。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):e1262-e1268. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005623. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
2
Exploring various polygenic risk scores for skin cancer in the phenomes of the Michigan genomics initiative and the UK Biobank with a visual catalog: PRSWeb.探索密歇根基因组倡议和英国生物库表型中用于皮肤癌的多种多基因风险评分:PRSWeb。
PLoS Genet. 2019 Jun 13;15(6):e1008202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008202. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Multiancestry transferability of a polygenic risk score for diverticulitis.多基因风险评分对憩室炎的多祖系可转移性。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 23;11(1):e001474. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001474.
4
Development of a Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Diverticulitis.开发一种多基因风险评分来预测憩室炎。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Feb 1;67(2):254-263. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002943. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Genome-wide polygenic risk score for retinopathy of type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病视网膜病变的全基因组多基因风险评分。
Hum Mol Genet. 2021 May 29;30(10):952-960. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddab067.
6
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
7
Phenotype risk scores (PheRS) for pancreatic cancer using time-stamped electronic health record data: Discovery and validation in two large biobanks.利用带时间戳的电子健康记录数据构建胰腺癌的表型风险评分(PheRS):在两个大型生物样本库中的发现与验证
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103652. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103652. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Multiancestral polygenic risk score for pediatric asthma.多祖先多基因风险评分与儿童哮喘。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Nov;150(5):1086-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.03.035. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
Novel Polygenic Risk Score and Established Clinical Risk Factors for Risk Estimation of Aortic Stenosis.新型多基因风险评分与既定临床风险因素在主动脉瓣狭窄风险评估中的应用。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Apr 1;9(4):357-366. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0011.
10
Identification of risk loci and a polygenic risk score for lung cancer: a large-scale prospective cohort study in Chinese populations.鉴定肺癌的风险基因座和多基因风险评分:一项针对中国人群的大规模前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Oct;7(10):881-891. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30144-4. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Prediction in Diverticulitis.憩室炎的风险预测
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 Sep 30;38(4):263-268. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791497. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Unmet social needs and diverticulitis: a phenotyping algorithm and cross-sectional analysis.未满足的社会需求与憩室炎:一种表型分析算法及横断面分析
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):866-875. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae238.
4
Multiancestry transferability of a polygenic risk score for diverticulitis.多基因风险评分对憩室炎的多祖系可转移性。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 23;11(1):e001474. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001474.
5
The Patient Perspective on Colectomy for Recurrent Diverticulitis: A Qualitative Study.患者视角下的复发性憩室炎结肠切除术:一项定性研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 May 1;279(5):818-824. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006225. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic performance of the 'DICA' endoscopic classification and the 'CODA' score in predicting clinical outcomes of diverticular disease: an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study.“DICA”内镜分类和“CODA”评分对预测憩室病临床结局的预后性能:一项国际、多中心、前瞻性队列研究。
Gut. 2022 Jul;71(7):1350-1358. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325574. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
National Variation in Elective Colon Resection for Diverticular Disease.择期结肠切除术治疗憩室病的国家差异。
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):363-370. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004236.
3
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Left-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis.美国结肠和直肠外科医师协会左侧结肠憩室炎治疗临床实践指南。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):728-747. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001679.
4
Assessing Differences in Cancer Surgeon Approaches to Patient-Centered Decision-Making Using Vignette-Based Methodology.采用基于病例的方法评估癌症外科医生在以患者为中心的决策方法上的差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;27(7):2149-2156. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08488-5. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
Family History Is Associated With Recurrent Diverticulitis After an Episode of Diverticulitis Managed Nonoperatively.家族病史与非手术治疗后复发性憩室炎相关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jul;63(7):944-954. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001656.
6
Preferences for bariatric surgery: comparing surgeons and patients using a discrete choice experiment.减重手术偏好:使用离散选择实验比较外科医生和患者。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Jun;16(6):738-744. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
7
Common variation in FAM155A is associated with diverticulitis but not diverticulosis.FAM155A 常见变异与憩室炎有关,但与憩室病无关。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):1658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58437-1.
8
Recognizing Heuristics and Bias in Clinical Decision-making.认识临床决策中的启发法与偏差
Ann Surg. 2020 May;271(5):813-814. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003699.
9
Predicting Benefit From Evolocumab Therapy in Patients With Atherosclerotic Disease Using a Genetic Risk Score: Results From the FOURIER Trial.利用遗传风险评分预测动脉粥样硬化疾病患者接受依洛尤单抗治疗的获益: FOURIER 试验结果。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 25;141(8):616-623. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043805. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
10
Patients With High Genome-Wide Polygenic Risk Scores for Coronary Artery Disease May Receive Greater Clinical Benefit From Alirocumab Treatment in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Trial.在 ODYSSEY OUTCOMES 试验中,具有高全基因组多基因风险评分的冠心病患者可能从阿利西尤单抗治疗中获得更大的临床获益。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 25;141(8):624-636. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044434. Epub 2019 Nov 11.