Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Research and Public Health, Reims Teaching Hospitals, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims, France.
AIDS. 2022 Nov 15;36(14):2015-2023. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003343. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
To evaluate if community-level HIV PrEP coverage is correlated with individual sexual behaviors.
We used demographic, behavioral, and sexual network data from ARTnet, a 2017-2019 study of United States MSM.
Multivariable regression models with a Bayesian modeling framework were used to estimate associations between area-level PrEP coverage and seven sexual behavior outcomes [number of total, main, and casual male partners (network degree); count of one-time partnerships; consistent condom use in one-time partnerships; and frequency of casual partnership anal sex (total and condomless)], controlling for individual PrEP use.
PrEP coverage ranged from 10.3% (Philadelphia) to 38.9% (San Francisco). Total degree was highest in Miami (1.35) and lowest in Denver (0.78), while the count of one-time partners was highest in San Francisco (11.7/year) and lowest in Detroit (1.5/year). Adjusting for individual PrEP use and demographics, community PrEP coverage correlated with total degree [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) = 1.73; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.92-3.44], casual degree (aIRR = 2.05; 95% CrI, 0.90-5.07), and count of one-time partnerships (aIRR = 1.90; 95% CrI, 0.46-8.54). Without adjustment for individual PrEP use, these associations strengthened. There were weaker or no associations with consistent condom use in one-time partnerships (aIRR = 1.68; 95% CrI, 0.86-3.35), main degree (aIRR = 1.21; 95% CrI, 0.48-3.20), and frequency of casual partnership condomless anal sex (aIRR = 0.23; 95% CrI, 0.01-3.60).
Most correlations between community PrEP coverage and sexual behavior were explained by individual PrEP use. However, some residual associations remained after controlling for individual PrEP use, suggesting that PrEP coverage may partially drive community-level differences in sexual behaviors.
评估社区层面的 HIV 暴露前预防(PrEP)覆盖率与个体性行为之间是否存在相关性。
我们使用了来自 ARTnet 的人口统计学、行为学和性网络数据,这是一项 2017-2019 年针对美国男男性行为者的研究。
使用贝叶斯建模框架的多变量回归模型,估计了地区层面 PrEP 覆盖率与七种性行为结果之间的关联[总伴侣数、主要伴侣数和偶然伴侣数(网络度);一次性伴侣数;一次性伴侣中使用安全套的频率;偶然伴侣无保护肛交的总频率和无保护肛交频率],同时控制了个体 PrEP 使用情况。
PrEP 覆盖率范围为 10.3%(费城)至 38.9%(旧金山)。迈阿密的总网络度最高(1.35),丹佛最低(0.78),而旧金山的一次性伴侣数最高(11.7/年),底特律最低(1.5/年)。在调整个体 PrEP 使用和人口统计学因素后,社区 PrEP 覆盖率与总网络度相关[调整后的发病率比(aIRR)=1.73;95%可信区间(CrI),0.92-3.44]、偶然网络度(aIRR=2.05;95%CrI,0.90-5.07)和一次性伴侣数(aIRR=1.90;95%CrI,0.46-8.54)。不调整个体 PrEP 使用情况,这些关联得到了加强。在调整个体 PrEP 使用情况后,一次性伴侣中使用安全套的频率(aIRR=1.68;95%CrI,0.86-3.35)、主要网络度(aIRR=1.21;95%CrI,0.48-3.20)和偶然伴侣无保护肛交的频率(aIRR=0.23;95%CrI,0.01-3.60)之间的关联较弱或不存在。
社区 PrEP 覆盖率与性行为之间的大多数相关性都可以用个体 PrEP 使用情况来解释。然而,在控制了个体 PrEP 使用情况后,仍然存在一些剩余的关联,这表明 PrEP 覆盖率可能部分导致了社区层面性行为的差异。