Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Am J Audiol. 2022 Sep;31(3):757-763. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00268. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with normal or near normal hearing (NH) in the contralateral ear, referred to as single-sided deafness (SSD), experience significantly better speech recognition in noise with their CI than without it, although reported outcomes vary. One possible explanation for differences in outcomes across studies could be differences in the spatial configurations used to assess performance. This study compared speech recognition for different spatial configurations of the target and masker, with test materials used clinically.
Sixteen CI users with SSD completed tasks of masked speech recognition presented in five spatial configurations. The target speech was presented from the front speaker (0° azimuth). The masker was located either 90° or 45° toward the CI-ear or NH-ear or colocated with the target. Materials were the AzBio sentences in a 10-talker masker and the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise test (BKB-SIN; four-talker masker). Spatial release from masking (SRM) was computed as the benefit associated with spatial separation relative to the colocated condition.
Performance was significantly better when the masker was separated toward the CI-ear as compared to colocated. No benefit was observed for spatial separations toward the NH-ear. The magnitude of SRM for spatial separations toward the CI-ear was similar for 45° and 90° when tested with the AzBio sentences, but a larger benefit was observed for 90° as compared to 45° for the BKB-SIN.
Masked speech recognition in CI users with SSD varies as a function of the spatial configuration of the target and masker. Results supported an expansion of the clinical test battery at the study site to assess binaural hearing abilities for CI candidates and recipients with SSD. The revised test battery presents the target from the front speaker and the masker colocated with the target, 90° toward the CI-ear, or 90° toward the NH-ear.
对侧耳正常或接近正常听力(NH)的人工耳蜗植入(CI)受者,称为单侧聋(SSD),与不使用 CI 相比,他们在 CI 下的噪声中言语识别能力显著提高,尽管报告的结果存在差异。研究结果差异的一个可能解释是用于评估性能的空间配置不同。本研究比较了不同目标和掩蔽器空间配置下的言语识别,使用了临床测试材料。
16 名 SSD 的 CI 用户完成了在五种空间配置下呈现的掩蔽语音识别任务。目标语音从前扬声器(0°方位)发出。掩蔽器位于 CI 耳或 NH 耳的 90°或 45°方向,或者与目标共置。材料为 AzBio 句子和 10 位说话人掩蔽器中的 Bamford-Kowal-Bench 语音噪声测试(BKB-SIN;四位说话人掩蔽器)。空间掩蔽释放(SRM)是相对于共置条件计算出的与空间分离相关的收益。
与共置相比,当掩蔽器向 CI 耳分离时,性能显著提高。当掩蔽器向 NH 耳分离时,没有观察到益处。在使用 AzBio 句子测试时,对于向 CI 耳的 45°和 90°空间分离,SRM 的幅度相似,但对于 BKB-SIN,90°的获益大于 45°。
SSD 的 CI 用户的掩蔽语音识别会随目标和掩蔽器的空间配置而变化。结果支持在研究地点扩展临床测试电池,以评估 SSD 的 CI 候选人和受者的双耳听力能力。修订后的测试电池从前扬声器呈现目标,目标与掩蔽器共置,90°朝向 CI 耳,或 90°朝向 NH 耳。