Connolly Dean J, Davies Emma, Lynskey Michael, Maier Larissa J, Ferris Jason A, Barratt Monica J, Winstock Adam R, Gilchrist Gail
National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Early Intervention Service, Newham Centre for Mental Health, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
LGBT Health. 2022 Nov;9(8):534-542. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2021.0242. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
The purpose of this study was to compare five gender groups (cisgender women, cisgender men, transgender women, transgender men, people with nonbinary/other identities) on measures of use of and dependence on seven substances. A two-stage approach to assessing gender allowed 126,648 participants from the 2018 Global Drug Survey (GDS) to be classified to one of these five gender groups. Participants were asked to disclose use of each substance in the preceding 12 months. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the Severity of Dependence Scale were used to assess dependence. Multivariable logistic regression generated odds ratios (ORs) to measure the association between gender and each substance use/dependence outcome, with cisgender women as the reference group. The sample comprised 43,331 cisgender women, 81,607 cisgender men, 215 transgender women, 254 transgender men, and 1241 people with nonbinary/other identities. Relative to cisgender women, nonbinary/other participants reported greater odds of last 12-month use of all substances (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.66-2.30), except alcohol (lower odds; AOR = 0.42), and greater odds of dependence on cannabis (AOR = 2.39), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (AOR = 1.64) and alcohol (AOR = 3.28), adjusting only for age (all < 0.05). Transgender 2018 GDS respondents, particularly those with nonbinary/other identities, had greater odds of reporting most substance use outcomes than cisgender women. These findings suggest that a nuanced approach to gender reporting in surveys and treatment centers is required to understand the needs of transgender people who use substances.
本研究的目的是比较五个性别群体(顺性别女性、顺性别男性、跨性别女性、跨性别男性、具有非二元/其他身份的人)在七种物质的使用和依赖指标上的差异。一种两阶段的性别评估方法使来自2018年全球药物调查(GDS)的126,648名参与者被归类到这五个性别群体之一。参与者被要求披露在前12个月内每种物质的使用情况。使用酒精使用障碍识别测试和依赖严重程度量表来评估依赖性。多变量逻辑回归生成比值比(OR)以衡量性别与每种物质使用/依赖结果之间的关联,以顺性别女性作为参照组。样本包括43,331名顺性别女性、81,607名顺性别男性、215名跨性别女性、254名跨性别男性以及1,241名具有非二元/其他身份的人。相对于顺性别女性,具有非二元/其他身份的参与者报告在前12个月内使用所有物质(酒精除外,其比值较低;调整后的比值比[AOR]=0.42)的可能性更高(调整后的比值比[AOR]=1.66 - 2.30),并且对大麻(AOR = 2.39)、3,4 - 亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸,AOR = 1.64)和酒精(AOR = 3.28)产生依赖的可能性更高,仅对年龄进行了调整(所有P值均<0.05)。2018年GDS的跨性别受访者,尤其是那些具有非二元/其他身份的人,报告大多数物质使用结果的可能性比顺性别女性更高。这些发现表明,在调查和治疗中心需要采用细致入微的性别报告方法,以了解使用物质的跨性别者的需求。