Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 May 26;78(6):1051-1059. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad012.
Investigate subjective cognitive decline (SCD) among 4 study groups consisting of cisgender and transgender adults who are from minoritized ethnoracial groups (i.e., minoritized ethnoracial transgender, minoritized ethnoracial cisgender) and White cisgender and transgender adults aged 45+ (i.e., White transgender, White cisgender) to determine the odds of SCD by group and to test for group differences.
Data from the 2015-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used in a modified case-control approach to perform an intercategorical intersectional study. Each transgender participant was matched to 2 cisgender men and 2 cisgender women, on state, ethnoracial identity, and age. Multivariable logistic regressions modeled SCD odds by group and post hoc contrasts estimated pairwise odds ratios comparing the SCD odds for each combination of groups.
SCD prevalence was highest among minoritized ethnoracial transgender (21.6%), followed by White transgender (15.0%), minoritized ethnoracial cisgender (12.0%), and White cisgender (9.0%). After accounting for age, education, and survey year, the odds of SCD were higher in minoritized ethnoracial transgender when compared to White cisgender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59-3.96) and minoritized ethnoracial cisgender (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16-3.09). The odds of SCD were higher in White transgender compared to White cisgender (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.20-2.30).
When considering the intersection of transgender and ethnoracial identities, we found that transgender adults from minoritized ethnoracial groups reported higher odds of SCD when compared to cisgender adults from minoritized ethnoracial groups. Additional studies are needed to understand the relationship between racialized and gendered inequities in cognitive impairment and how specific mechanisms of systemic transphobia and racism may contribute to this inequity.
调查由少数族裔群体(即少数族裔跨性别者、少数族裔顺性别者)的顺性别和跨性别成年人以及 45 岁及以上的白种顺性别和跨性别成年人(即白种跨性别者、白种顺性别者)组成的 4 个研究组中的主观认知下降(SCD)情况,以确定按组划分的 SCD 几率,并检验组间差异。
使用 2015-2020 年行为风险因素监测系统的数据,采用改良病例对照方法进行交叉分类交叉研究。每个跨性别参与者都与 2 名顺性别男性和 2 名顺性别女性按州、种族认同和年龄相匹配。多变量逻辑回归模型按组建模 SCD 几率,事后对比估计比较每组组合的 SCD 几率的两两比值比。
少数族裔跨性别者的 SCD 患病率最高(21.6%),其次是白种跨性别者(15.0%)、少数族裔顺性别者(12.0%)和白种顺性别者(9.0%)。在考虑年龄、教育程度和调查年份后,与白种顺性别者相比,少数族裔跨性别者的 SCD 几率更高(调整后的比值比[aOR] = 2.51,95%置信区间[CI]:1.59-3.96)和少数族裔顺性别者(aOR = 1.89,95% CI:1.16-3.09)。与白种顺性别者相比,白种跨性别者的 SCD 几率更高(aOR = 1.66,95% CI:1.20-2.30)。
当考虑跨性别者和种族认同的交叉时,我们发现少数族裔群体的跨性别成年人比少数族裔群体的顺性别成年人报告的 SCD 几率更高。需要进一步研究来了解认知障碍中种族和性别不平等之间的关系,以及系统性跨性别恐惧症和种族主义的具体机制如何导致这种不平等。