Suppr超能文献

关于撒哈拉以南非洲地区对新冠疫苗犹豫态度的评论

Commentary on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in sub-Saharan Africa.

作者信息

Kabakama Severin, Konje Eveline T, Dinga Jerome Nyhalah, Kishamawe Colman, Morhason-Bello Imran, Hayombe Peter, Adeyemi Olufela, Chimuka Ernest, Lumu Ivan, Amuasi John, Acheampong Theophilus, Dzinamarira Tafadzwa

机构信息

Humanitarian and Public Health Consultant, Mwanza P.O. Box 511, Tanzania.

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza P.O. Box 1464, Tanzania.

出版信息

Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 11;7(7):130. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7070130.

Abstract

Rates of vaccination against COVID-19 remain lower in sub-Saharan Africa than in other low and middle-income regions. This is, in part, attributed to vaccine hesitancy, mainly due to misinformation about vaccine origin, efficacy and safety. From August to December 2021, we gathered the latest experiences and opinions on four vaccine hesitancy-related areas (policies, perceived risk religious beliefs, and misinformation) from 12 sub-Saharan African researchers, four of whom have published about COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. The authors included two political and business experts, six public health specialists, five epidemiologists, and four biostatisticians from ten sub-Saharan African countries( Cameroon, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe). The authors' overarching opinions were that political influences, religious beliefs and low perceived risk exists in sub-Saharan Africa, and they collectively contribute to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Communication strategies should target populations initially thought by policy makers to be at low risk, use multiple communication avenues and address major concerns in the population.

摘要

撒哈拉以南非洲地区的新冠疫苗接种率仍低于其他低收入和中等收入地区。部分原因在于疫苗犹豫,这主要是由于有关疫苗来源、效力和安全性的错误信息。2021年8月至12月,我们收集了12位撒哈拉以南非洲研究人员在四个与疫苗犹豫相关领域(政策、感知风险、宗教信仰和错误信息)的最新经验和观点,其中四人曾发表过关于新冠疫苗犹豫的文章。作者包括来自撒哈拉以南非洲十个国家(喀麦隆、加纳、肯尼亚、利比里亚、尼日利亚、塞拉利昂、南非、坦桑尼亚、乌干达和津巴布韦)的两名政治和商业专家、六名公共卫生专家、五名流行病学家和四名生物统计学家。作者们的总体观点是,撒哈拉以南非洲存在政治影响、宗教信仰和低感知风险,它们共同导致了新冠疫苗犹豫。沟通策略应针对政策制定者最初认为风险较低的人群,使用多种沟通渠道并解决民众的主要担忧。

相似文献

5
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Africa: a scoping review.非洲的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:范围综述。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Jul 19;7(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00255-1.

引用本文的文献

2
Equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines in Botswana: a scoping review.博茨瓦纳新冠疫苗的公平可及性:一项范围综述
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 29;5:1609089. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1609089. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验