Eur J Intern Med. 2022 Sep;103:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
Patients affected with severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suffer from a wide range of sequelae, from limited airway diseases to multiple organ failure. These sequelae may create exercise limitation, impair the daily activity and thus impact the mental health and the social life. However, the extent of functional limitations and depressive symptoms are understudied especially in patients with COVID-19 after intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization.
The Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) was a clinical trial that randomized ICU patients with COVID-19 to intermediate-dose vs standard-dose anticoagulation. In the current study, we assessed the interval change in 30-day and 90-day functional limitations based on the post-COVID-19 functional status scale (PCFS) and depressive symptoms based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) in the trial participants. We also assessed the effect of intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation on the functional outcomes and depressive symptoms.
Of 600 randomized patients in INSPIRATION, 375 (age: 62 years; 42% women) participated in the functional status study. 195 patients died during the 90-day follow up (191 by day 30). Among survivors, between day 30 and day 90, the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe functional limitation (PCSF grade 3-or-4) decreased from 20.0% to 4.8% (P <0.001) and PHQ-2 ≥ 3 decreased from 25.5% to 16.6% (P = 0.05). The proportion of patients with no functional limitations (PCFS grade 0) increased (4.2% to 15.4%, P<0.001). Intermediate-dose compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation did not impact the 90-day proportion of patients with PCFS grade 3-or-4 (5.3% vs 4.2%; odds ratio (OR), 1.20, [95% CI, 0.46-3.11]; P = 0.80) or PHQ-2 ≥ 3 (17.9% vs 15.3%; OR, 1.14, [95% CI, 0.79-1.65]; P = 0.14), with similar results when accounting for study center.
In patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU, functional limitations and depressive symptoms were common at 30-day follow-up and had some improvement by 90-day follow-up among survivors. Intermediate-dose compared to standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation did not improve functional outcomes.
患有严重 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的患者会出现多种后遗症,从有限的气道疾病到多器官衰竭。这些后遗症可能会导致运动受限,从而影响日常活动,进而影响心理健康和社会生活。然而,在因 COVID-19 而住进重症监护病房(ICU)的患者中,功能受限和抑郁症状的严重程度仍研究不足。
危重 COVID-19 患者中中等剂量与标准剂量预防性抗凝的比较:一项开放标签随机对照试验(INSPIRATION)是一项临床试验,该试验将 COVID-19 重症监护病房患者随机分为中等剂量与标准剂量抗凝组。在本研究中,我们根据 COVID-19 后功能状况量表(PCFS)评估了试验参与者在 30 天和 90 天的功能受限间隔变化,以及根据患者健康问卷-2(PHQ-2)评估了抑郁症状。我们还评估了中等剂量与标准剂量预防性抗凝对功能结局和抑郁症状的影响。
在 INSPIRATION 中,600 名随机分组的患者中,有 375 名(年龄:62 岁;42%为女性)参加了功能状态研究。195 名患者在 90 天随访期间死亡(191 名在第 30 天死亡)。在幸存者中,从第 30 天到第 90 天,中重度功能受限(PCFS 3 级或 4 级)患者的比例从 20.0%降至 4.8%(P <0.001),PHQ-2≥3 的患者比例从 25.5%降至 16.6%(P=0.05)。无功能受限(PCFS 0 级)的患者比例增加(从 4.2%升至 15.4%,P<0.001)。与标准剂量预防性抗凝相比,中等剂量抗凝对 90 天内的 PCFS 3 级或 4 级患者比例没有影响(5.3%比 4.2%;比值比(OR),1.20[95%置信区间(CI),0.46-3.11];P=0.80)或 PHQ-2≥3(17.9%比 15.3%;OR,1.14[95%CI,0.79-1.65];P=0.14),在考虑到研究中心的情况下,也得到了类似的结果。
在因 COVID-19 住进 ICU 的患者中,30 天随访时功能受限和抑郁症状常见,幸存者中在 90 天随访时这些症状均有改善。与标准剂量预防性抗凝相比,中等剂量抗凝并未改善功能结局。