Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, DIBINEM, University of Bologna - Alma Mater Studiorum, Via San Vitale 59, Bologna, 40125, Italy.
Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 2, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 25;12(1):12671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16480-0.
Objectives of the study were to investigate biomechanical properties of severely compromised premolars restored with composite restorations using finite element analysis (FEA), and in vitro fracture resistance test. A 3-D model of an endodontically treated premolar was created in Solidworks. Different composite restorations were modelled (direct restoration-DR; endo-crown-EC; post, core, and crown-C) with two different supporting tissues: periodontal ligament/alveolar bone (B), and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Models were two-point axially loaded occlusally (850 N). Von Mises stresses and strains were calculated. The same groups were further tested for static fracture resistance in vitro (n = 5, 6.0 mm-diameter ball indenter, vertical load). Fracture resistance data were statistically analyzed (p < 0.050). The highest stresses and strains in all FEA models were observed on occlusal and vestibular cervical surfaces, corresponding to fracture propagation demonstrated in vitro. C showed the lowest stress in dentin, while EC showed lower stresses and strains in crown cement. B models demonstrated larger high stress areas in the root than PMMA models. No significant differences in fracture resistance (N) were observed between groups (DR: 747.7 ± 164.0, EC: 867.3 ± 108.1, C: 866.9 ± 126.3; p = 0.307). More conservative restorations seem a feasible alternative for endodontically treated premolars to conventional post-core-crown.
研究目的是通过有限元分析(FEA)和体外抗折强度试验研究用复合修复体修复严重受损前磨牙的生物力学性能。在 Solidworks 中创建了一个根管治疗前磨牙的 3D 模型。用两种不同的支持组织(牙周韧带/牙槽骨(B)和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA))对不同的复合修复体(直接修复体-DR;内冠-EC;桩核冠-C)进行建模。模型在两点轴向加载(850 N)。计算 Von Mises 应力和应变。将相同的组进一步进行体外静态抗折强度测试(n = 5,直径 6.0mm 球压头,垂直加载)。对断裂阻力数据进行统计学分析(p < 0.050)。在所有 FEA 模型中,最高的应力和应变都在前磨牙的咬合和颊侧颈表面观察到,与体外观察到的断裂传播相对应。C 在牙本质中表现出最低的应力,而 EC 在冠部粘结剂中表现出较低的应力和应变。B 模型在根内显示出比 PMMA 模型更大的高应力区域。各组间抗折强度(N)无显著差异(DR:747.7 ± 164.0,EC:867.3 ± 108.1,C:866.9 ± 126.3;p = 0.307)。更保守的修复体似乎是传统桩核冠修复后磨牙的可行替代方案。