Suppr超能文献

德国农村地区骨质疏松性骨折预防计划(OFRA)的健康经济评估:行动能力和防跌倒课程、骨骼健康检查以及居住环境安全咨询。

Health-Economic Evaluation of the German Osteoporotic Fracture Prevention Program in Rural Areas (OFRA): Mobility and Falls Prevention Classes, Examination of Bone Health, and Consultation on Safety in the Living Environment.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(3):641-647. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07691-2. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures are one of the leading causes of disability in older adults. Yet, evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preventive approaches combining bone health and fall prevention is rare.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a health-economic evaluation of the German osteoporotic fracture prevention program in rural areas (OFRA).

DESIGN

Secondary cluster-randomized intervention study based on routine data.

PARTICIPANTS

All districts in five federal states in Germany were cluster-randomized as intervention or control districts. OFRA was offered to community-living (a) women aged 75-79 years or (b) women and men aged 70-84 years with a prior fragility fracture in the intervention districts. Individuals who meet these criteria in the control districts were assigned to the control group.

INTERVENTION

OFRA comprised mobility and falls prevention classes, examination of bone health by bone density measurement, and consultation on safety in the home living environment.

MAIN MEASURES

We measured health-care costs and effectiveness in terms of time to fragility fracture or death within 1 year after initial contact, based on health insurance claims data. Implementation costs were recorded by the intervention performers. We calculated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and employed the net-benefit approach to construct a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC).

KEY RESULTS

There were 9408 individuals in the intervention group and 27,318 in the control group. Mean time to fragility fracture or death (difference: 0.82 days) and health-care costs (difference: 111.73€, p < .01) were reduced, but mean intervention costs (difference: 260.10€) increased total costs (difference: 148.37€, p < .001) in the intervention group. The ICER per fracture-free year of survival was 66,094.63€. The CEAC showed no acceptable probability of cost-effectiveness at a reasonable willingness to pay.

CONCLUSION

OFRA showed reduced rates of fragility fractures, but had high implementation costs, resulting in an unfavorable ICER. The cost-effectiveness of OFRA may improve with a longer follow-up.

摘要

背景

脆性骨折是导致老年人残疾的主要原因之一。然而,将骨骼健康和防跌倒措施结合起来的预防方法的有效性和成本效益证据很少。

目的

对德国农村地区骨质疏松性骨折预防计划(OFRA)进行健康经济评估。

设计

基于常规数据的二级聚类随机干预研究。

参与者

德国五个联邦州的所有地区均进行聚类随机分组,分为干预组或对照组。OFRA 提供给社区居住的(a)75-79 岁女性或(b)70-84 岁有脆性骨折既往史的女性和男性。在对照组中符合这些标准的个体被分配到对照组。

干预

OFRA 包括运动和防跌倒课程、骨密度测量检查骨骼健康以及咨询家庭生活环境中的安全问题。

主要措施

我们根据健康保险索赔数据,以初次接触后 1 年内发生脆性骨折或死亡的时间来衡量医疗保健成本和效果。干预执行者记录实施成本。我们计算了增量成本效益比(ICER),并采用净收益方法构建成本效益可接受性曲线(CEAC)。

主要结果

干预组有 9408 人,对照组有 27318 人。脆性骨折或死亡的平均时间(差异:0.82 天)和医疗保健成本(差异:111.73 欧元,p <.01)降低,但干预组的平均干预成本(差异:260.10 欧元)增加了总费用(差异:148.37 欧元,p <.001)。无骨折生存的每 1 年的 ICER 为 66094.63 欧元。CEAC 显示,在合理的支付意愿下,没有成本效益的可接受概率。

结论

OFRA 降低了脆性骨折的发生率,但实施成本较高,导致不利的 ICER。随着随访时间的延长,OFRA 的成本效益可能会提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dffa/9971377/5f5200484772/11606_2022_7691_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验