• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 18 家巴伐利亚医院实施综合护理计划以避免老年人髋部脆性骨折 - 骨折联络服务 FLS-CARE 的集群随机对照研究方案。

Implementation of an integrated care programme to avoid fragility fractures of the hip in older adults in 18 Bavarian hospitals - study protocol for the cluster-randomised controlled fracture liaison service FLS-CARE.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Management at LMU (LMU-HSM), Munich, Germany.

Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01966-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-020-01966-1
PMID:33435869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7801785/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The economic and public health burden of fragility fractures of the hip in Germany is high. The likelihood of requiring long-term care and the risk of suffering from a secondary fracture increases substantially after sustaining an initial fracture. Neither appropriate confirmatory diagnostics of the suspected underlying osteoporosis nor therapy, which are well-recognised approaches to reduce the burden of fragility fractures, are routinely initiated in the German healthcare system. Therefore, the aim of the study FLS-CARE is to evaluate whether a coordinated care programme can close the prevention gap for patients suffering from a fragility hip fracture through the implementation of systematic diagnostics, a falls prevention programme and guideline-adherent interventions based on the Fracture Liaison Services model.

METHODS

The study is set up as a non-blinded, cluster-randomised, controlled trial with unequal cluster sizes. Allocation to intervention group (FLS-CARE) and control group (usual care) follows an allocation ratio of 1:1 using trauma centres as the unit of allocation. Sample size calculations resulted in a total of 1216 patients (608 patients per group distributed over 9 clusters) needed for the analysis. After informed consent, all participants are assessed directly at discharge, after 3 months, 12 months and 24 months. The primary outcome measure of the study is the secondary fracture rate 24 months after initial hip fracture. Secondary outcomes include differences in the number of falls, mortality, quality-adjusted life years, activities of daily living and mobility.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness/utility of FLS implementation in Germany. Findings of the process evaluation will also shed light on potential barriers to the implementation of FLS in the context of the German healthcare system. Challenges for the study include the successful integration of the outpatient sector as well as the future course of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 and its influence on the intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) 00022237 , prospectively registered 2020-07-09.

摘要

背景

德国髋部脆性骨折的经济和公共卫生负担很高。初次骨折后,患者需要长期护理的可能性以及再次发生骨折的风险会大幅增加。德国医疗体系中并未常规开展针对疑似潜在骨质疏松症的适当确诊诊断,也未开展有助于降低脆性骨折负担的治疗。因此,FLS-CARE 研究的目的是评估协调护理计划是否可以通过实施基于骨折联络服务模式的系统诊断、防跌倒计划和基于指南的干预措施来缩小髋部脆性骨折患者的预防差距。

方法

该研究采用非盲、集群随机对照试验设计,且集群大小不等。干预组(FLS-CARE)和对照组(常规护理)采用创伤中心作为分组单位,按照 1:1 的分配比例进行分组。样本量计算结果表明,总共需要 1216 名患者(每组 608 名患者,分布在 9 个集群中)进行分析。在获得知情同意后,所有参与者在初次髋部骨折后直接进行评估,分别在出院后 3 个月、12 个月和 24 个月进行评估。该研究的主要结局指标是初次髋部骨折后 24 个月的继发性骨折发生率。次要结局指标包括跌倒次数、死亡率、质量调整生命年、日常生活活动和移动能力的差异。

讨论

该研究首次评估了 FLS 在德国的实施效果和成本效益/效用。过程评估的结果也将阐明 FLS 在德国医疗体系背景下实施的潜在障碍。该研究面临的挑战包括成功整合门诊部门以及 2020 年冠状病毒大流行的未来进程及其对干预措施的影响。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册处(DRKS)00022237 ,前瞻性注册,2020 年 7 月 9 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b490/7802124/dfb8e50a2daf/12877_2020_1966_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b490/7802124/dfb8e50a2daf/12877_2020_1966_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b490/7802124/dfb8e50a2daf/12877_2020_1966_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of an integrated care programme to avoid fragility fractures of the hip in older adults in 18 Bavarian hospitals - study protocol for the cluster-randomised controlled fracture liaison service FLS-CARE.在 18 家巴伐利亚医院实施综合护理计划以避免老年人髋部脆性骨折 - 骨折联络服务 FLS-CARE 的集群随机对照研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01966-1.
2
The interdisciplinary fracture liaison service improves health-related outcomes and survival of older adults after hip fracture surgical repair.跨学科骨折联络服务可改善老年髋部骨折手术后患者的健康相关结局和生存率。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Oct 17;17(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01171-0.
3
Fracture liaison service and mortality in elderly hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study.骨折联络服务与老年髋部骨折患者的死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jan;31(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05153-w. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
4
Fracture liaison services in Ireland-how do we compare to international standards?爱尔兰的骨折联络服务——我们与国际标准相比如何?
Osteoporos Int. 2022 May;33(5):1089-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06251-4. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evaluation of the Lille University Hospital's Fracture Liaison Service between January 2016 and January 2018.骨质疏松性骨折的二级预防:2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间里尔大学医院骨折联络服务的评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Sep;30(9):1779-1788. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05036-0. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
6
Breaking the cycle of recurrent fracture: implementing the first fracture liaison service (FLS) in British Columbia, Canada.打破反复骨折的循环:在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省实施首个骨折联络服务(FLS)。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Nov 27;14(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0662-6.
7
Secondary osteoporosis prevention: three-year outcomes from a Fracture Liaison Service in elderly hip fracture patients.继发性骨质疏松预防:老年髋部骨折患者骨折联络服务的三年结果。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 May 5;36(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02761-3.
8
Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis.西澳骨质疏松症护理模式的实施:利用急诊信息系统识别脆性骨折患者的骨折联络服务,以改善当前实践并降低再骨折率:为期 12 个月的分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1759-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4526-5. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
A 2-year follow-up of a novel Fracture Liaison Service: can we reduce the mortality in elderly hip fracture patients? A prospective cohort study.一种新型骨折联络服务的 2 年随访:我们能否降低老年髋部骨折患者的死亡率?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Aug;33(8):1695-1702. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06298-x. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
10
Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture.预防未来骨折:与门诊骨折联络服务以及髋部骨折患者标准管理相比,矫形骨科骨折联络服务的效果。
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec 11;12(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0373-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability and Appropriateness of Patientcentered, Family-focused, Community-oriented (PFC) Lens in the Ortho-Geriatric Fracture Liaison Service among Family and Community Medicine Trainees.以患者为中心、以家庭为重点、以社区为导向(PFC)视角在家庭与社区医学实习生的骨科-老年骨折联络服务中的可接受性与适宜性
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Jul 31;58(13):22-28. doi: 10.47895/amp.v58i13.8110. eCollection 2024.
2
A 10-Year Experience of an Integrated Geriatric Hip Fracture Treatment Protocol: Outcomes at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.老年髋部骨折综合治疗方案的10年经验:至少2年随访结果
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2024 Aug 9;15:21514593241273155. doi: 10.1177/21514593241273155. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature.骨折联络服务的经济影响和成本效益:文献系统评价。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Jun;29(6):1227-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4411-2. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
2
German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.德国 EQ-5D-5L 价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8.
3
Imminent risk of fracture after fracture.骨折后即将发生的骨折风险。
Declining hip fracture burden in Sweden 1998-2019 and consequences for projections through 2050.
1998 年至 2019 年瑞典髋部骨折负担下降及其对 2050 年预测的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 6;14(1):706. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51363-6.
4
Reduced Awareness for Osteoporosis in Hip Fracture Patients Compared to Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Replacement.髋部骨折患者的骨质疏松症意识低于择期髋关节置换的老年患者。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 31;58(11):1564. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111564.
5
Application of machine learning model to predict osteoporosis based on abdominal computed tomography images of the psoas muscle: a retrospective study.基于腰部竖脊肌 CT 图像的机器学习模型预测骨质疏松症的应用:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03502-9.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain.西班牙脆性骨折二级预防中骨折联络服务与标准护理的成本效益分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr 22;14:249-264. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S350790. eCollection 2022.
7
Fragility fractures: proposal of the best practice through the fracture coordination units: the experience of Mexico.脆性骨折:通过骨折协调单位提出的最佳实践建议:墨西哥的经验。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Dec 28;17(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01044-y.
8
The Impact of COVID-19 on the Optimal Management of Osteoporosis.2019冠状病毒病对骨质疏松症优化管理的影响
J Bone Metab. 2021 May;28(2):115-122. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2021.28.2.115. Epub 2021 May 31.
9
Reduced Awareness for Osteoporosis in Distal Radius Fracture Patients Compared to Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures.与股骨近端骨折患者相比,桡骨远端骨折患者对骨质疏松症的认知度较低。
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 19;10(4):848. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040848.
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Mar;28(3):775-780. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3868-0. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
Value of a coordinated management of osteoporosis via Fracture Liaison Service for the treatment of orthogeriatric patients.通过骨折联络服务对骨质疏松症进行协同管理在老年骨科患者治疗中的价值。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Oct;42(5):559-564. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0710-5. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
5
GRAND-4: the German retrospective analysis of long-term persistence in women with osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates or denosumab.GRAND-4:德国对使用双膦酸盐或地诺单抗治疗的骨质疏松症女性长期持续性的回顾性分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Oct;27(10):2967-78. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3623-6. Epub 2016 May 12.
6
Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain.西班牙骨折联络服务中两年的治疗依从性及相关因素
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Nov;26(11):2579-85. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3185-z. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
7
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
8
Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures (FAITH): design and rationale for a multi-centre randomized trial comparing sliding hip screws and cancellous screws on revision surgery rates and quality of life in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.使用替代植入物治疗髋部骨折的固定术(FAITH):一项多中心随机试验的设计与原理,该试验比较滑动髋螺钉和松质骨螺钉在股骨颈骨折治疗中的翻修手术率和生活质量。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jun 26;15:219. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-219.
9
Measuring patient satisfaction with health care treatment using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction measure delivered superior and robust satisfaction estimates.使用简短患者满意度评估量表来衡量患者对医疗护理的满意度,可以得到更高质量和更稳健的满意度评估结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):527-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.010.
10
The epidemiology of osteoporosis--Bone Evaluation Study (BEST): an analysis of routine health insurance data.骨质疏松症的流行病学——骨评估研究(BEST):对常规健康保险数据的分析。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Jan;110(4):52-7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0052. Epub 2013 Jan 25.