Chawla Amrita, Afridi Faiz, Prasath Vishnu, Chokshi Ravi, Ahlawat Sushil
Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):156-164. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09427-z. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
A pancreatic pseudocyst is a collection of fluid surrounded by a well-defined wall that contains no solid material. Studies on outcomes of pancreatic pseudocyst drainage have largely been limited to small cohorts. This study aims to take a population based approach to evaluate differences in inpatient outcomes among laparoscopic, percutaneous, and endoscopic drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts.
The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify inpatient stays for pancreatic pseudocysts in which a single drainage approach was conducted. Baseline characteristic differences were compared with Rao-Scott chi squared and Mann-Whitney U tests. Propensity score matching controlling for clinical and demographic covariates followed by multivariable regression was used to pairwise compare drainage outcomes. Primary outcomes were length of stay, total charge, mortality, and disposition. Secondary outcomes were procedure related complication rates.
Among a total of 35,640 weighted pancreatic pseudocyst cases, 3235 underwent drainage via a single procedure. Percutaneous was the most frequent drainage method performed (44.5%) and was more likely to be performed at nonteaching hospitals than laparoscopic (17% vs 9%, p = 0.04). Percutaneous drainage was associated with longer LOS (aIRR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.86, p = 0.01) versus endoscopic and lower rates of routine disposition (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.89, p = 0.02) relative to endoscopic and laparoscopic (aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.61, p < 0.01) drainage. There were no differences in primary outcomes in laparoscopic versus endoscopic drainage. Percutaneous drainage was associated with higher rates of septic shock than laparoscopic drainage (aOR 2.59, 95% CI 1.15-5.82, p = 0.02).
Endoscopic and laparoscopic pancreatic pseudocyst drainage are associated with the least short term procedure related complications and more favorable in-hospital outcomes compared to percutaneous approaches. However, percutaneous drainage was the most commonly performed method in the 2017 NIS database.
胰腺假性囊肿是一种被明确界定的壁所包围的液体集合,其中不包含固体物质。关于胰腺假性囊肿引流结果的研究在很大程度上仅限于小样本队列。本研究旨在采用基于人群的方法,评估腹腔镜、经皮和内镜下胰腺假性囊肿引流的住院结局差异。
使用国家住院样本数据库识别接受单一引流方法的胰腺假性囊肿住院病例。采用Rao-Scott卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验比较基线特征差异。在控制临床和人口统计学协变量后进行倾向得分匹配,随后进行多变量回归,以成对比较引流结果。主要结局为住院时间、总费用、死亡率和出院情况。次要结局为手术相关并发症发生率。
在总共35640例加权胰腺假性囊肿病例中,3235例接受了单一手术引流。经皮引流是最常用的引流方法(44.5%),与腹腔镜引流相比,在非教学医院进行经皮引流的可能性更大(17%对9%,p = 0.04)。与内镜引流和腹腔镜引流相比,经皮引流与更长的住院时间相关(调整后的发病率比1.42,95%置信区间1.07 - 1.86,p = 0.01),且常规出院率较低(调整后的比值比0.45,95%置信区间0.23 - 0.89,p = 0.02)(腹腔镜引流调整后的比值比0.41,95%置信区间0.27 - 0.61,p < 0.01)。腹腔镜引流与内镜引流的主要结局无差异。与腹腔镜引流相比,经皮引流与更高的感染性休克发生率相关(调整后的比值比2.59,95%置信区间1.15 - 5.82,p = 0.02)。
与经皮方法相比,内镜和腹腔镜胰腺假性囊肿引流与最少的短期手术相关并发症及更有利的住院结局相关。然而,在2017年国家住院样本数据库中,经皮引流是最常用的方法。