Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1- CMU 5-6, Geneva, Switzerland.
Interprofessional Centre of Simulation - CIS, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, formative OSCE were transformed into online OSCE, and senior students (near peers) substituted experienced clinical teachers. The aims of the study were to evaluate quality of the feedbacks given by near peers during online OSCEs and explore the experience of near-peer feedback from both learner's and near peer's perspectives.
All 2nd year medical students (n = 158) attended an online OSCE under the supervision of twelve senior medical students. Outcome measures were 1) students' perception of the quality of the feedback through an online survey (Likert 1-5); 2) objective assessment of the quality of the feedback focusing on both the process and the content using a feedback scale (Likert 1-5); 3) experience of near peer feedback in two different focus groups.
One hundred six medical students answered the questionnaire and had their feedback session videotaped. The mean perceived overall quality of senior students' overall feedback was 4.75 SD 0.52. They especially valued self-evaluation (mean 4.80 SD 0.67), balanced feedback (mean 4.93 SD 0.29) and provision of simulated patient's feedback (mean 4.97 SD 0.17). The overall objective assessment of the feedback quality was 3.73 SD 0.38: highly scored skills were subjectivity (mean 3.95 SD 1.12) and taking into account student's self-evaluation (mean 3.71 (SD 0.87). Senior students mainly addressed history taking issues (mean items 3.53 SD 2.37) and communication skills (mean items 4.89 SD 2.43) during feedback. Participants reported that near peer feedback was less stressful and more tailored to learning needs- challenges for senior students included to remain objective and to provide negative feedback.
Increased involvement of near peers in teaching activities is strongly supported for formative OSCE and should be implemented in parallel even if experience teachers are again involved in such teaching activities. However, it requires training not only on feedback skills but also on the specific content of the formative OSCE.
在新冠疫情期间,形成性客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)转变为线上 OSCE,高年级学生(准同行)代替有经验的临床教师。本研究旨在评估准同行在在线 OSCE 中提供的反馈质量,并从学习者和准同行的角度探索准同行反馈的经验。
所有二年级医学生(n=158)在 12 名高年级医学生的监督下参加在线 OSCE。评估指标为 1)学生通过在线调查(1-5 分制)感知反馈质量;2)使用反馈量表(1-5 分制)重点评估反馈的质量,包括过程和内容;3)通过两个不同的焦点小组了解准同行反馈体验。
106 名医学生回答了问卷并进行了录像反馈。高年级学生整体反馈的整体质量的平均感知得分为 4.75(标准差 0.52)。他们特别重视自我评估(平均 4.80,标准差 0.67)、平衡反馈(平均 4.93,标准差 0.29)和提供模拟患者的反馈(平均 4.97,标准差 0.17)。反馈质量的整体客观评估得分为 3.73(标准差 0.38):高评分技能包括主观性(平均 3.95,标准差 1.12)和考虑学生的自我评估(平均 3.71,标准差 0.87)。准同行主要在反馈中提到病史采集问题(平均项目 3.53,标准差 2.37)和沟通技巧(平均项目 4.89,标准差 2.43)。参与者报告说,准同行反馈的压力较小,更能满足学习需求——对高年级学生的挑战包括保持客观性和提供负面反馈。
强烈支持增加准同行在教学活动中的参与度,即使有经验的教师再次参与此类教学活动,也应并行实施。然而,这不仅需要反馈技能的培训,还需要对形成性 OSCE 的具体内容进行培训。