Ji Guojun, Yu Muhong, Tan Kim Hua, Kumar Ajay, Gupta Shivam
Management School, Xiamen University, Fujian, China.
Department of Operations and Innovation Management, Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK.
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Jul 20:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04867-1.
Data-driven innovation enables firms to design products that are more responsive to market needs, which greatly reduces the risk of innovation. Customer data in the same supply chain has certain commonality, but data separation makes it difficult to maximize data value. The selection of an appropriate mode for cooperation innovation should be based on the particular big data analytics capability of the firms. This paper focuses on the influence of big data analytics capability on the choice of cooperation mode, and the influence of their matching relationship on cooperation performance. Specifically, using game-theoretic models, we discuss two cooperation modes, data analytics is implemented individually (i.e., loose cooperation) by either firm, or jointly (tight cooperation) by both firms, and further discuss the addition of coordination contracts under the loose mode. Several important conclusions are obtained. Firstly, both firms' big data capability have positive effects on the selection of tight cooperation mode. Secondly, with the improvement of big data capability, the firms' innovative performance gaps between loose and tight mode will increase significantly. Finally, when the capability meet certain condition, the cost subsidy contract can alleviate the gap between the two cooperative models.
数据驱动的创新使企业能够设计出更能响应市场需求的产品,这大大降低了创新风险。同一供应链中的客户数据具有一定的共性,但数据分离使得难以最大化数据价值。合作创新合适模式的选择应基于企业特定的大数据分析能力。本文重点研究大数据分析能力对合作模式选择的影响,以及它们的匹配关系对合作绩效的影响。具体而言,利用博弈论模型,我们讨论两种合作模式,即数据分析由任一企业单独实施(即松散合作),或由双方联合实施(紧密合作),并进一步讨论松散模式下协调合同的加入。得出了几个重要结论。首先,双方企业的大数据能力对紧密合作模式的选择有积极影响。其次,随着大数据能力的提高,企业在松散和紧密模式下的创新绩效差距将显著增大。最后,当能力满足一定条件时,成本补贴合同可以缩小两种合作模式之间的差距。