DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M4, Canada.
Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary's University, 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 26;22(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08287-6.
Midwives have long workdays and work many weeks on call. There is a concern that these extended work schedules can negatively affect their intention to stay in the profession.
This study provides evidence on Canadian midwives' preferences for and experiences with policies and guidelines which limit the hours of work and weeks per year preferred to be on call, and examines the relationship between preferences and midwives' intention to stay in the profession.
Data come from our 2018 pan-Canadian survey of midwives. Descriptive statistics of 720 midwives' preferences and experiences are provided. In the correlations followed by the OLS regressions, 596 midwives' data are used to test the associations between preferences and intention to stay in the profession. STATA (version 15) is used. A thematic analysis of 274 midwives' responses to the open-ended survey question is conducted to give voice to midwives on what can be done for retention.
Three quarters of the 720 respondents prefer policies and guidelines to limit hours of work in a 24-hour period, though less than half have policies and guidelines on hours of work. More than half prefer to have fewer on-call weeks or never to be on call, less than a third prefer same number of on-call weeks, and only 2% prefer more weeks to be on call. Midwives are currently working on average 33 weeks per year on call. OLS regression analysis shows that 'met preference' for hours of work and on-call weeks are positively associated with intention to stay. In responding to the open-ended survey question, midwives recommend limiting the consecutive hours of work and on-call weeks to manageable hours and weeks to retain them in the profession.
Midwives whose preferences are met are the ones intending to stay in the profession. There is, however, a large number of midwives with 'unmet needs' preferring to have policies and guidelines to limit the hours but do not have that currently, and would like to work fewer weeks on call than currently. These are the midwives who are not intending to stay in the profession.
助产士的工作日很长,而且经常需要在值班周工作。有人担心,这些延长的工作时间表可能会对他们留在这个职业的意愿产生负面影响。
本研究提供了加拿大助产士对限制工作时间和每年值班周数的政策和指导方针的偏好和经验的证据,并考察了偏好与助产士留在该职业的意愿之间的关系。
数据来自我们 2018 年对加拿大各地助产士的全国性调查。提供了 720 名助产士偏好和经验的描述性统计数据。在随后的 OLS 回归的相关性分析中,使用了 596 名助产士的数据来检验偏好与留在该职业的意愿之间的关联。使用 STATA(版本 15)。对 274 名助产士对开放式调查问题的回复进行主题分析,以表达助产士对保留职业的看法。
在 720 名受访者中,有四分之三的人赞成制定政策和指导方针,以限制 24 小时内的工作时间,但不到一半的人有关于工作时间的政策和指导方针。超过一半的人更喜欢减少值班周数或从不值班,不到三分之一的人更喜欢相同数量的值班周数,只有 2%的人更喜欢增加值班周数。助产士目前平均每年有 33 周的值班时间。OLS 回归分析显示,工作时间和值班周数的“符合偏好”与留在该职业的意愿呈正相关。在对开放式调查问题的回复中,助产士建议将连续工作时间和值班周数限制在可管理的时间和周数,以留住他们从事该职业。
满足偏好的助产士更倾向于留在该职业。然而,有相当数量的助产士“未满足需求”,他们赞成制定政策和指导方针来限制工作时间,但目前没有这样的政策和指导方针,而且希望比目前减少值班周数。这些助产士不打算留在这个职业。