Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster Midwifery Research Centre, 1280 Main St. West, HSC-4H26, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
McMaster Health Forum, 1280 Main St West, MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5033-x.
Despite the significant variability in the role and integration of midwifery across provincial and territorial health systems, there has been limited scholarly inquiry into whether, how and under what conditions midwifery has been assigned roles and integrated into Canada's health systems.
We use Yin's (2014) embedded single-case study design, which allows for an in-depth exploration to qualitatively assess how, since the regulation of midwives in 1994, the Ontario health system has assigned roles to and integrated midwives as a service delivery option. Kingdon's agenda setting and 3i + E theoretical frameworks are used to analyze two recent key policy directions (decision to fund freestanding midwifery-led birth centres and the Patients First primary care reform) that presented opportunities for the integration of midwives into the health system. Data were collected from key informant interviews and documents.
Nineteen key informant interviews were conducted, and 50 documents were reviewed in addition to field notes taken during the interviews. Our findings suggest that while midwifery was created as a self-regulated profession in 1994, health-system transformation initiatives have restricted the profession's integration into Ontario's health system. The policy legacies of how past decisions influence the decisions possible today have the most explanatory power to understand why midwives have had limited integration into interprofessional maternity care. The most important policy legacies to emerge from the analyses were related to payment mechanisms. In the medical model, payment mechanisms privilege physician-provided and hospital-based services, while payment mechanisms in the midwifery model have imposed unintended restrictions on the profession's ability to practice in interprofessional environments.
This is the first study to explain why midwives have not been fully integrated into the Ontario health system, as well as the limitations placed on their roles and scope of practice. The study also builds a theoretical understanding of the integration process of healthcare professions within health systems and how policy legacies shape service delivery options.
尽管在省级和地区卫生系统中,助产士的角色和整合存在显著差异,但对于助产士的角色分配和整合到加拿大卫生系统的情况,无论是在何种条件下、以何种方式、以及是否存在这些情况,都鲜有学术研究。
我们采用了 Yin(2014)提出的嵌入式单案例研究设计,这种设计允许深入探索,以定性评估自 1994 年以来,安大略省卫生系统如何为助产士分配角色,并将其整合为一种服务提供选择。Kingdon 的议程设置和 3i+E 理论框架被用于分析最近的两项关键政策方向(决定为独立的助产主导的生育中心提供资金,以及“以患者为中心”的初级保健改革),这为助产士融入卫生系统提供了机会。数据是通过关键知情者访谈和文件收集的。
进行了 19 次关键知情者访谈,并审查了 50 份文件,此外还记录了访谈期间的现场笔记。我们的研究结果表明,尽管助产士在 1994 年被创建为一个自我监管的专业,但卫生系统转型举措限制了该专业在安大略省卫生系统中的整合。过去决策如何影响今天可能的决策的政策遗产对理解为什么助产士在参与多专业产妇护理方面的整合程度有限具有最大的解释力。从分析中得出的最重要的政策遗产与支付机制有关。在医疗模式下,支付机制偏向于医生提供的和医院为基础的服务,而在助产模式下的支付机制对该专业在多专业环境中执业的能力施加了意想不到的限制。
这是第一项解释为什么助产士没有完全整合到安大略省卫生系统中,以及对其角色和实践范围的限制的研究。该研究还建立了对卫生系统内医疗保健专业整合过程以及政策遗产如何塑造服务提供选择的理论理解。