Suppr超能文献

断言评估。

Assessment of assertion.

作者信息

St Lawrence J S

出版信息

Prog Behav Modif. 1987;21:152-90.

PMID:3588362
Abstract

Behavioral assessment of assertion is an evolving technology. Although there have been many recent advances in the assessment of assertion, many unresolved issues continue to plague researcher and clinician alike. At a conceptual level, a precise theoretical rationale of assertion has yet to be articulated and accepted. Comprehensive identification of the various parameters that influence assertive responding have not been adequately evaluated, although person and situational variables are widely accepted parameters. Although a plethora of assessment instruments and strategies have emerged, more attention needs to be diverted to establishing their psychometric properties. There have been some promising starts, though there continues to be relatively little psychometric support for the adequacy of existing measures. Several self-report instruments have reasonably well-documented reliability and validity, but questions remain regarding the accuracy of self-reported assertion. In addition, a flood of new instruments continues the proliferation of measures. Researchers would be better advised to direct their efforts to establishing psychometric support for the more promising of the existing instruments than in continuing to expand energy on unproven new measures. Serious reservations have emerged regarding, in particular, the external validity of role-play assessment and cloud the confidence that can be placed on findings generated from role-play measures. The issues that have been critically identified throughout this chapter are not new. They occur time and time again in the assessment literature of the past decade. Yet the field continues to reflect inattention to cautions that have been repeatedly voiced. Measures continue to flood the literature without adequate psychometric support, and researchers rush toward outcome evaluation without attending to the questionable utility of findings generated from unproven measures. There has been a great deal of progress in a relatively short period of time. However, clearer answers are necessary before scientific credibility can be established for social skills research in general--and assertion research in particular.

摘要

对坚定行为的行为评估是一项不断发展的技术。尽管最近在坚定行为评估方面取得了许多进展,但许多未解决的问题仍然困扰着研究人员和临床医生。在概念层面上,坚定行为的确切理论依据尚未得到清晰阐述和认可。虽然个人和情境变量是广泛认可的参数,但影响坚定反应的各种参数的全面识别尚未得到充分评估。尽管出现了大量的评估工具和策略,但需要将更多注意力转向确定它们的心理测量特性。虽然已经有了一些有希望的开端,但对于现有测量方法的充分性,仍然相对缺乏心理测量学支持。一些自我报告工具具有记录合理良好的信度和效度,但关于自我报告的坚定行为的准确性仍存在疑问。此外,大量新工具继续使测量方法不断增加。研究人员最好将精力用于为现有工具中更有前景的工具建立心理测量学支持,而不是继续在未经证实的新方法上投入精力。特别是对于角色扮演评估的外部效度,已经出现了严重的保留意见,这也使人们对基于角色扮演测量得出的研究结果的信心蒙上了阴影。在本章中被严格指出的问题并不新鲜。在过去十年的评估文献中,它们反复出现。然而,该领域仍然表现出对反复提出的告诫的忽视。在没有充分心理测量学支持的情况下,测量方法继续充斥着文献,研究人员在没有关注未经证实的测量方法所产生结果的可疑效用的情况下就急于进行结果评估。在相对较短的时间内已经取得了很大进展。然而,在为一般社会技能研究——尤其是坚定行为研究——建立科学可信度之前,还需要更明确的答案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验