Mandalà Marco, Mazzocchin Luca, Ward Bryan Kevin, Viberti Francesca, Bindi Ilaria, Salerni Lorenzo, Colletti Giacomo, Colletti Liliana, Colletti Vittorio
Otolaryngology Department, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Ospedale Sacro Cuore-Don G. Calabria, Negrar, 37100 Verona, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 20;12(7):950. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12070950.
Background: An electrophysiological investigation with auditory brainstem response (ABR), round window electrocochleography (RW-ECoG), and electrical-ABR (E-ABR) was performed in children with suspected hearing loss with the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment. The effectiveness of the electrophysiological measures as diagnostic tools was assessed in this study. Methods: In this retrospective case series with chart review, 790 children below 3 years of age with suspected profound hearing loss were tested with impedance audiometry and underwent electrophysiological investigation (ABR, RW-ECoG, and E-ABR). All implanted cases underwent pure-tone audiometry (PTA) of the non-implanted ear at least 5 years after surgery for a long-term assessment of the reliability of the protocol. Results: Two hundred and fourteen children showed bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss. In 56 children with either ABR thresholds between 70 and 90 dB nHL or no response, RW-ECoG showed thresholds below 70 dB nHL. In the 21 infants with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss receiving a unilateral cochlear implant, no statistically significant differences were found in auditory thresholds in the non-implanted ear between electrophysiological measures and PTA at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). Eight implanted children showed residual hearing below 2000 Hz worse than 100 dB nHL and 2 children showed pantonal residual hearing worse than 100 dB nHL (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The audiological evaluation of infants with a comprehensive protocol is highly reliable. RW-ECoG provided a better definition of hearing thresholds, while E-ABR added useful information in cases of auditory nerve deficiency.
对疑似听力损失的儿童进行了听觉脑干反应(ABR)、圆窗电耳蜗图(RW - ECoG)和电ABR(E - ABR)的电生理检查,目的是早期诊断和治疗。本研究评估了这些电生理检查作为诊断工具的有效性。方法:在这个通过病历回顾的回顾性病例系列中,对790名3岁以下疑似重度听力损失的儿童进行了声阻抗测听,并接受了电生理检查(ABR、RW - ECoG和E - ABR)。所有植入病例在术后至少5年对未植入耳进行纯音听力测试(PTA),以对该方案的可靠性进行长期评估。结果:214名儿童表现为双侧重度至极重度听力损失。在56名ABR阈值在70至90 dB nHL之间或无反应的儿童中,RW - ECoG显示阈值低于70 dB nHL。在21名单侧植入人工耳蜗的双侧极重度感音神经性听力损失婴儿中,在最后一次随访时,电生理检查和PTA在未植入耳的听觉阈值方面未发现统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。8名植入儿童在2000 Hz以下显示残余听力比100 dB nHL差,2名儿童显示泛音残余听力比100 dB nHL差(p>0.05)。结论:采用综合方案对婴儿进行听力学评估具有高度可靠性。RW - ECoG能更好地界定听力阈值,而E - ABR在听神经缺陷病例中增加了有用信息。