Wang Sheng-Fen, Tsai Tsung-Ting, Li Yun-Da, Chiu Ping-Yeh, Hsieh Ming-Kai, Liao Jen-Chung, Lai Po-Liang, Kao Fu-Cheng
Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 5, Fusing St., Gueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Biomedicines. 2022 Jul 10;10(7):1659. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071659.
Background: Postoperative immunosuppression is associated with blood loss and surgical trauma during surgery and subsequently predisposes patients to increased morbidity. Spine endoscopic surgery has been accepted as an effective surgical technique with less surgical trauma and less blood loss for the complication of infectious spondylodiscitis. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether PEIDF could reduce the morbidity rates for patients with infectious spondylodiscitis. Methods: We launched a retrospective cohort study on the comparison of the perioperative prognosis between PEIDF and conventional open surgery for single-level lumbar infectious spondylodiscitis in patients with poor physical health (ASA ≥ 4) from 2014 to 2019. Results: Forty-four patients were included in this study. Fifteen of them underwent PEIDF, and the rest of the 29 patients were treated with open surgery. Less surgical blood loss (p < 0.001) and intraoperative transfusions (p < 0.001) with a better decline of CRP (p = 0.017) were statistically significant in patients receiving PEIDF. Patients undergoing conventional open surgery encountered more postoperative sepsis (p = 0.030), a higher qSOFA score (p = 0.044), and prolonged-time for CRP normalization (p = 0.001). Conclusions: PEIDF minimizes a poor postoperative outcome due to less surgical trauma, intraoperative blood loss, and the need for a blood transfusion.
术后免疫抑制与手术期间的失血和手术创伤有关,随后使患者更容易出现发病率增加的情况。脊柱内镜手术已被公认为是一种有效的手术技术,对于感染性脊椎椎间盘炎并发症而言,其手术创伤较小且失血较少。因此,本研究的目的是调查经皮内镜下椎间盘切除术(PEIDF)是否能降低感染性脊椎椎间盘炎患者的发病率。方法:我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了2014年至2019年期间身体健康状况较差(美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级≥4级)的单节段腰椎感染性脊椎椎间盘炎患者接受PEIDF与传统开放手术的围手术期预后。结果:本研究纳入了44例患者。其中15例接受了PEIDF,其余29例患者接受了开放手术治疗。接受PEIDF的患者手术失血量较少(p<0.001)、术中输血较少(p<0.001),且CRP下降情况较好(p=0.017),差异具有统计学意义。接受传统开放手术的患者术后发生败血症的情况更多(p=0.030)、序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分更高(p=0.044),且CRP恢复正常的时间更长(p=0.001)。结论:由于手术创伤较小、术中失血量较少以及输血需求较少,PEIDF可将不良术后结局降至最低。