Institute of Psychology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, 20-400 Lublin, Poland.
Institute of Pedagogy, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, 20-400 Lublin, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;19(14):8783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148783.
The study had four objectives: (a) identifying and characterizing strategies for involving parents of students with SEN (students with special educational needs) in remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic; (b) comparing these strategies with those used by parents of students without SEN (non-SEN students); (c) identifying predictors of parental involvement in the remote education of students with SEN; (d) checking whether the identified strategies differentiate the perceived barriers and benefits of remote learning. In total, 421 parents of primary school students participated in the study, 83 of whom (20%) were parents of children with SEN (SEN group). Based on the factor analysis of the results (respondents completed a 66-item electronic questionnaire), three main strategies for parental involvement in children's remote education were identified: (1) committed teacher (CT), with 40% in the SEN group and 55% in the non-SEN group; (2) autonomy-supporting coach (ASC), with 22% in the SEN group and 26% in the non-SEN group; (3) committed teacher and reliever (CTR), with 38% in the SEN group and 19% in the non-SEN group. The strongest predictor of parental involvement with SEN students in the role of committed teacher was excessive demands from school. Parents whose children showed low motivation to learn were the most likely to do some of their children's school tasks for them and apply the committed teacher and reliever strategy. The positive aspects of remote education were mostly noticed by moderately committed parents who gave their children a lot of autonomy (autonomy-supporting coaches). The obtained results can be included in the optimization of schools' activities in terms of organizing remote education for students with SEN and cooperating with parents.
(a) 确定并描述在 COVID-19 大流行期间让特殊教育需要学生(SEN 学生)的家长参与远程教育的策略;(b) 将这些策略与非 SEN 学生(非 SEN 学生)的家长所使用的策略进行比较;(c) 确定影响 SEN 学生远程教育家长参与的因素;(d) 检查所确定的策略是否会区分远程学习的感知障碍和益处。共有 421 名小学生家长参与了这项研究,其中 83 名(20%)是 SEN 学生的家长(SEN 组)。基于对结果的因子分析(受访者完成了一份 66 项的电子问卷),确定了三种主要的家长参与子女远程教育的策略:(1) 尽责教师(CT),SEN 组中有 40%,非 SEN 组中有 55%;(2) 自主支持型教练(ASC),SEN 组中有 22%,非 SEN 组中有 26%;(3) 尽责教师和支持者(CTR),SEN 组中有 38%,非 SEN 组中有 19%。对 SEN 学生家长在尽责教师角色中参与的最强预测因素是学校的过度要求。那些孩子学习动机较低的家长最有可能为他们做一些孩子的学校任务,并采用尽责教师和支持者策略。远程教育的积极方面大多被那些给予孩子自主权(自主支持教练)的适度尽责的家长所注意到。这些结果可以被纳入学校在为 SEN 学生组织远程教育和与家长合作方面的活动优化中。