Bertuccioli Alexander, Cardinali Marco, Benelli Piero
Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61122 Urbino, Italy.
Department of Internal Medicine, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, 47921 Rimini, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;12(7):1062. doi: 10.3390/life12071062.
Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) is a technique used for the assessment of body composition based on the electrical properties of biological tissues and for evaluating variations related to hydration and nutrition status changes. The present study aimed to investigate the possibility of predicting performance status and injuries using segmental BIVA analysis. Data were collected from 14 professional male athletes aged between 20 and 39 years of Caucasian and Afro-American ethnicity belonging to the US Victoria Libertas Pallacanestro Pesaro team in the Italian Serie A basketball championship. From an analysis of training injuries, the data highlight a possible positive link between the number of training injuries and upper hemisoma reactance (XCEmsSup) (t = 2.881, p = 0.007), an inverse relationship between training injury duration and higher right lower limb reactance (XCLegDx) (t = −4.213, p < 0.001), and an inverse relationship between injury duration and higher body mass index (t = −4.213, p < 0.001), highlighting how higher cellularity seems less prone to severe training injuries. Analyzing match-day injuries, right upper-limb higher reactance (XCArmdx) negatively correlates with match-day number of injuries (t = −4.469, p < 0.001), right upper limb resistance (RZArmDx) negatively correlates with lower match-day injury duration (t = −4.202, p < 0.001), and trunk resistance (RZTrunk) positive correlates with lower match-day injury duration (t = 2.803, p = 0.008), in contrast with the training data analysis. Analyzing the relationship between the BIVA parameters and performance indicators, right upper limb resistance (RzArmDx) has a positive link with plus−minus (t = 2.889, p = 0.007); however, RzArmDx negatively correlates with assist number (t = −3.362, p = 0.002), and BMI is directly proportional to assist number (t = 2.254, p = 0.032). These first data suggest a good correlation between the cellularity of different body districts and the risk of injuries in training but still leave several doubts surrounding the concrete predictive potential regarding performance and injuries during competitions while considering the numerous factors involved. Further studies on BIVA and similar applications could provide tools for managing athlete health and physical integrity preservation and potentially help us better understand the factors involved in improving performance.
生物电阻抗矢量分析(BIVA)是一种基于生物组织电学特性来评估身体成分,并用于评估与水合作用和营养状况变化相关的差异的技术。本研究旨在探讨使用分段BIVA分析预测运动表现状态和损伤的可能性。数据收集自14名年龄在20至39岁之间、属于意大利甲级篮球联赛美国维多利亚·利贝塔斯·帕拉卡内斯特罗·佩萨罗队的白种人和非裔美国种族的职业男性运动员。通过对训练损伤的分析,数据突出显示了训练损伤数量与上半身电抗(XCEmsSup)之间可能存在的正相关关系(t = 2.881,p = 0.007),训练损伤持续时间与较高的右下肢电抗(XCLegDx)之间呈负相关关系(t = -4.213,p < 0.001),以及损伤持续时间与较高的体重指数之间呈负相关关系(t = -4.213,p < 0.001),这突出表明较高的细胞密度似乎不太容易发生严重的训练损伤。分析比赛日损伤情况时,右上臂较高的电抗(XCArmdx)与比赛日损伤数量呈负相关(t = -4.469,p < 0.001),右上臂电阻(RZArmDx)与比赛日较低的损伤持续时间呈负相关(t = -4.202,p < 0.001),而躯干电阻(RZTrunk)与比赛日较低的损伤持续时间呈正相关(t = 2.803,p = 0.008),这与训练数据分析结果相反。分析BIVA参数与运动表现指标之间的关系时,右上臂电阻(RzArmDx)与正负值有正相关关系(t = 2.889,p = 0.007);然而,RzArmDx与助攻次数呈负相关(t = -3.362,p = 0.002),且体重指数与助攻次数成正比(t = 2.254,p = 0.032)。这些初步数据表明不同身体部位的细胞密度与训练中的损伤风险之间存在良好的相关性,但在考虑到众多相关因素的情况下,对于比赛期间运动表现和损伤的具体预测潜力仍存在诸多疑问。关于BIVA及类似应用的进一步研究可以为管理运动员健康和保护身体完整性提供工具,并有可能帮助我们更好地理解影响提高运动表现的因素。