Suppr超能文献

胆汁酸定量评估的环形试验揭示了方法和分析物特异性的准确性和可重复性。

Ring Trial on Quantitative Assessment of Bile Acids Reveals a Method- and Analyte-Specific Accuracy and Reproducibility.

作者信息

Haange Sven-Bastiaan, Till Andreas, Bergh Per-Olof, Fauler Günter, Gigl Michael, Löfgren-Sandblom Anita, Schaap Frank G, Clavel Thomas, Trautwein Christian, Fenske Wiebke, Kleigrewe Karin, Marschall Hanns-Ulrich, Olde Damink Steven W M, Moustafa Tarek, von Bergen Martin, Rolle-Kampczyk Ulrike

机构信息

Department of Molecular Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University Medical Center Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Metabolites. 2022 Jun 23;12(7):583. doi: 10.3390/metabo12070583.

Abstract

Bile acids are a key mediator of the molecular microbiome-host interaction, and various mass spectrometry-based assays have been developed in the recent decade to quantify a wide range of bile acids. We compare existing methodologies to harmonize them. Methodology for absolute quantification of bile acids from six laboratories in Europe were compared for the quantification of the primary bile acids cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) and conjugated products glycocholic acid (GCA) and taurocholic acid (TCA). For the bacterially modified secondary bile acids, the quantification of deoxycholic acid (DCA) and lithocholic acid (LCA) was compared. For the murine bile acids, we used the primary muricholic acids (α-MCA and, β-MCA) and the intestinally produced secondary bile acid muricholic (ω-MCA). The standards were spiked into methanol:water (1:1) mix as well as in human and murine serum at either low concentration range (150-3000 nM) or high concentration range (1500-40,000 nM). The precision was better for higher concentrations. Measurements for the hydrophobic unconjugated bile acids LCA and ω-MCA were the most challenging. The quality assessments were generally very similar, and the comprehensive analyses demonstrated that data from chosen locations can be used for comparisons between studies.

摘要

胆汁酸是分子微生物群与宿主相互作用的关键介质,近十年来已开发出各种基于质谱的检测方法来定量多种胆汁酸。我们比较现有方法以使其协调一致。比较了欧洲六个实验室用于绝对定量胆汁酸的方法,以定量主要胆汁酸胆酸(CA)和鹅去氧胆酸(CDCA)及其共轭产物甘氨胆酸(GCA)和牛磺胆酸(TCA)。对于细菌修饰的次级胆汁酸,比较了脱氧胆酸(DCA)和石胆酸(LCA)的定量。对于鼠胆汁酸,我们使用了主要的鼠胆酸(α-MCA和β-MCA)以及肠道产生的次级胆汁酸鼠胆酸(ω-MCA)。将标准品加入甲醇:水(1:1)混合物以及人血清和鼠血清中,浓度范围为低浓度(150 - 3000 nM)或高浓度(1500 - 40,000 nM)。较高浓度时精密度更好。疏水性未结合胆汁酸LCA和ω-MCA的测量最具挑战性。质量评估总体上非常相似,综合分析表明所选地点的数据可用于研究间的比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f6/9319092/d69e45aeda04/metabolites-12-00583-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验