Suwa Reiko, Kume Yohei, Kawase Miyuki, Chishiki Mina, Ono Takashi, Norito Sakurako, Sato Ko, Okamoto Michiko, Kumaki Satoru, Nagai Yukio, Hosoya Mitsuaki, Takeda Makoto, Nishimura Hidekazu, Hashimoto Koichi, Shirato Kazuya
Department of Virology III, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 4-7-1 Gakuen, Musashimurayama 208-0011, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikariga-Oka, Fukushima 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Pathogens. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):754. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070754.
The World Health Organization initiated a global surveillance system for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in 2015, and the pilot surveillance is ongoing. The real-time RT-PCR RSV assays (Pan-RSV and duplex assays) developed by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are applied as the standard assays. To introduce these as standard assays in Japan, their practicality was evaluated using 2261 specimens obtained from pediatric inpatients in Japan, which were collected from 2018 to 2021. Although the Pan-RSV and duplex assays had similar analytical sensitivities, they yielded 630 (27.9%) and 786 (34.8%) RSV-positive specimens, respectively (p < 0.001). Although sequencing analysis showed mismatches in the reverse primer used in the Pan-RSV assay, these mismatches did not affect its analytical sensitivity. The analysis of read numbers of RSV isolates from air−liquid interface culture of human bronchial/tracheal epithelial cells showed that the duplex assay had a greater number of reads than did the Pan-RSV assay. Therefore, the duplex assay has superior detection performance compared with the Pan-RSV assay, but the two assays have similar analytical sensitivities.
世界卫生组织于2015年启动了呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)全球监测系统,目前试点监测正在进行中。美国疾病控制与预防中心研发的实时逆转录聚合酶链反应RSV检测方法(全RSV检测和双重检测)被用作标准检测方法。为了在日本将这些方法引入为标准检测方法,我们使用了2018年至2021年期间从日本儿科住院患者中获取的2261份标本对其实用性进行了评估。尽管全RSV检测和双重检测具有相似的分析灵敏度,但它们分别检测出630份(27.9%)和786份(34.8%)RSV阳性标本(p<0.001)。虽然测序分析显示全RSV检测中使用的反向引物存在错配,但这些错配并不影响其分析灵敏度。对人支气管/气管上皮细胞气液界面培养物中的RSV分离株读数进行分析表明,双重检测的读数比全RSV检测更多。因此,与全RSV检测相比,双重检测具有更优异的检测性能,但两种检测方法具有相似的分析灵敏度。