Cheng Haoyue, Peng Zhicheng, Si Shuting, Alifu Xialidan, Zhou Haibo, Chi Peihan, Zhuang Yan, Mo Minjia, Yu Yunxian
Department of Public Health and Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China.
Department of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health and Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jul 8;10(7):1101. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071101.
A number of SARS-CoV-2 variants that have evolved to have significant immune escape have emerged worldwide since the COVID-19 outbreak. The efficacy of prime vaccination is waning with the evolution of SARS-CoV-2, and the necessity of booster doses is more and more prominent. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the neutralization activity against the wild type and variants (Beta, Delta, and Omicron) in different prime-boost vaccination regimens. Electronic databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, medRxiv, Wanfang and CNKI were used to retrieve original studies. A total of 16 studies, 9 prime-boost vaccination regimes, and 3134 subjects were included in the meta-analysis and random effect models were used to estimate pooled neutralization titers. The neutralization activity against SARS-CoV-2 showed a significant decline with the evolution of the virus, especially in the populations primed with inactivated vaccines. For homologous immunization, only the populations boosted with mRNA vaccines consistently had a significant rise in neutralization titers (Beta: MD = 0.97; Delta: MD = 1.33; Omicron: MD = 0.74). While the heterologous immunization was more effective, the increment of neutralization titers against wild type, Beta, Delta and Omicron was 1.65 (95% CI: 1.32-1.96), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.53-1.54), 1.46 (95% CI: 1.07-1.85) and 1.15 (95% CI: 0.68-1.61), respectively. With the evolution of SARS-CoV-2, the effectiveness of prime immunization is waning. Although the administration of the booster dose could ameliorate the neutralization titers, homologous immunization regimens were gradually losing their effectiveness. Therefore, a heterologous booster dose is required, especially in populations primed with inactivated vaccines.
自新冠疫情爆发以来,全球出现了许多进化出显著免疫逃逸能力的新冠病毒变异株。随着新冠病毒的进化,初次疫苗接种的效力正在减弱,加强剂量的必要性日益凸显。因此,本研究旨在比较不同初免 - 加强疫苗接种方案对野生型和变异株(贝塔、德尔塔和奥密克戎)的中和活性。使用包括PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、medRxiv、万方和知网在内的电子数据库检索原始研究。共有16项研究、9种初免 - 加强疫苗接种方案和3134名受试者纳入荟萃分析,并使用随机效应模型估计合并中和滴度。随着病毒的进化,针对新冠病毒的中和活性显著下降,尤其是在接种灭活疫苗进行初次免疫的人群中。对于同源免疫,只有接种mRNA疫苗进行加强免疫的人群中和滴度持续显著升高(贝塔:MD = 0.97;德尔塔:MD = 1.33;奥密克戎:MD = 0.74)。而异源免疫更有效,针对野生型、贝塔、德尔塔和奥密克戎的中和滴度增量分别为1.65(95%CI:1.32 - 1.96)、1.03(95%CI:0.53 - 1.54)、1.46(95%CI:1.07 - 1.85)和1.15(95%CI:0.68 - 1.61)。随着新冠病毒的进化,初次免疫的有效性正在减弱。尽管接种加强剂量可以改善中和滴度,但同源免疫方案正逐渐失去效力。因此,需要接种异源加强剂量,尤其是在接种灭活疫苗进行初次免疫的人群中。