• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异源和同源 COVID-19 疫苗方案的有效性:基于网络荟萃分析的实时系统评价。

Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens: living systematic review with network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

BMJ. 2022 May 31;377:e069989. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-069989.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2022-069989
PMID:35640925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9724446/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens with and without boosting in preventing covid-19 related infection, hospital admission, and death.

DESIGN

Living systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

World Health Organization covid-19 databases, including 38 sources of published studies and preprints.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies.

METHODS

38 WHO covid-19 databases were searched on a weekly basis from 8 March 2022 to 31 July 2022. Studies that assessed the effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens with or without a booster were identified. Studies were eligible when they reported the number of documented, symptomatic, severe covid-19 infections, covid-19 related hospital admissions, or covid-19 related deaths among populations that were vaccinated and unvaccinated. The primary measure was vaccine effectiveness calculated as 1−odds ratio. Secondary measures were surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) scores and the relative effects for pairwise comparisons. The risk of bias was evaluated by using the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for all cohort and case-control studies. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (version 2; ROB-2) was used to assess randomised controlled trials.

RESULTS

The second iteration of the analysis comprised 63 studies. 25 combinations of covid-19 vaccine regimens were identified, of which three doses of mRNA vaccine were found to be 93% (95% credible interval 70% to 98%) effective against asymptomatic or symptomatic covid-19 infections for non-delta or non-omicron related infections. Heterologous boosting using two dose adenovirus vector vaccines with one dose mRNA vaccine showed a vaccine effectiveness of 94% (72% to 99%) against non-delta or non-omicron related asymptomatic or symptomatic infections. Three doses of mRNA vaccine were found to be the most effective in reducing non-delta or non-omicron related hospital admission (96%, 82% to 99%). The vaccine effectiveness against death in people who received three doses of mRNA vaccine remains uncertain owing to confounders. The estimate for a four dose mRNA vaccine regimen was of low certainty, as only one study on the effectiveness of four doses could be included in this update. More evidence on four dose regimens will be needed to accurately assess the effectiveness of a fourth vaccine dose. For people with delta or omicron related infection, a two dose regimen of an adenovirus vector vaccine with one dose of mRNA booster was 77% (42% to 91%) effective against asymptomatic or symptomatic covid-19 infections, and a three dose regimen of a mRNA vaccine was 93% (76% to 98%) effective against covid-19 related hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

An mRNA booster is recommended to supplement any primary vaccine course. Heterologous and homologous three dose regimens work comparably well in preventing covid-19 infections, even against different variants. The effectiveness of three dose vaccine regimens against covid-19 related death remains uncertain.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This review was not registered. The protocol is included in the supplementary document.

READERS' NOTE: This article is a living systematic review that will be updated to reflect emerging evidence. Updates may occur for up to two years from the date of original publication. This version is update 1 of the original article published on 31 May 2022 (BMJ 2022;377:e069989), and previous versions can be found as data supplements (https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2022-069989/related). When citing this paper please consider adding the version number and date of access for clarity.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/9724446/291ba772f64f/auwi069989_1.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/9724446/291ba772f64f/auwi069989_1.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/9724446/291ba772f64f/auwi069989_1.f1.jpg
摘要

目的

评估异源和同源新冠疫苗方案(有无加强针)在预防新冠相关感染、住院和死亡方面的有效性。

设计

实时系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

数据来源

世界卫生组织新冠数据库,包括 38 个已发表研究和预印本来源。

研究选择

随机对照试验、队列研究和病例对照研究。

方法

从 2022 年 3 月 8 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日,每周在世界卫生组织新冠数据库中进行搜索。确定评估异源和同源新冠疫苗方案(有无加强针)有效性的研究。当研究报告了疫苗接种和未接种人群中记录的、有症状的、严重的新冠感染、新冠相关住院或新冠相关死亡的数量时,研究即为合格。主要衡量指标为疫苗效力,计算方法为 1-比值比。次要衡量指标为累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)评分和两两比较的相对效果。使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估所有队列和病例对照研究的偏倚风险。使用随机对照试验的 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(第 2 版;ROB-2)评估随机对照试验。

结果

第二次分析迭代包括 63 项研究。确定了 25 种新冠疫苗方案组合,其中三剂 mRNA 疫苗对非德尔塔或非奥密克戎相关感染的无症状或有症状新冠感染的有效性为 93%(95%可信区间 70%至 98%)。使用两剂腺病毒载体疫苗加一剂 mRNA 疫苗进行异源加强针的疫苗效力为 94%(72%至 99%),可预防非德尔塔或非奥密克戎相关的无症状或有症状感染。三剂 mRNA 疫苗在降低非德尔塔或非奥密克戎相关住院方面最为有效(96%,82%至 99%)。由于混杂因素,mRNA 疫苗在预防死亡方面的有效性仍不确定。由于仅能纳入一项关于四剂疫苗有效性的研究,因此对四剂疫苗方案的估计确定性较低。需要更多关于四剂方案的证据,以准确评估第四剂疫苗的有效性。对于感染德尔塔或奥密克戎的人群,两剂腺病毒载体疫苗加一剂 mRNA 加强针对无症状或有症状新冠感染的有效性为 77%(42%至 91%),三剂 mRNA 疫苗对新冠相关住院的有效性为 93%(76%至 98%)。

结论

建议使用 mRNA 加强针来补充任何初级疫苗接种方案。异源和同源三剂方案在预防新冠感染方面同样有效,即使是针对不同的变异株。三剂疫苗方案在预防新冠相关死亡方面的有效性仍不确定。

系统评价注册

本综述未注册。方案包含在补充文件中。

读者注意事项

本文是一篇实时系统评价,将根据新出现的证据进行更新。更新可能会在原始文章发表之日起长达两年内进行。这是原始文章于 2022 年 5 月 31 日(BMJ 2022;377:e069989)发表的更新 1 版本,以及之前的版本可以作为数据补充(https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2022-069989/related)。为了清晰起见,在引用本文时,请考虑添加版本号和访问日期。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens: living systematic review with network meta-analysis.异源和同源 COVID-19 疫苗方案的有效性:基于网络荟萃分析的实时系统评价。
BMJ. 2022 May 31;377:e069989. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-069989.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
9
Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.新型冠状病毒疫苗的有效性和安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):CD015477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015477.
10
Nirmatrelvir combined with ritonavir for preventing and treating COVID-19.奈玛特韦/利托那韦片用于 COVID-19 的预防和治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):CD015395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015395.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during a period of Omicron variant predominance among Bangladeshi population: A test-negative design measurement.在孟加拉国人群中奥密克戎变异株占主导期间评估新冠疫苗的有效性:一项检测呈阴性设计测量。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2518644. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2518644. Epub 2025 Jun 28.
2
Heterologous prime-boost vaccination drives stromal activation and adaptive immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants.异源初免-加强免疫接种可驱动基质激活和针对新冠病毒变异株的适应性免疫。
Front Immunol. 2025 May 28;16:1597417. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1597417. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 booster vaccination against the Omicron and Delta variants in England.在英格兰,ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 加强疫苗接种对奥密克戎和德尔塔变异株的有效性。
Nat Commun. 2022 Dec 12;13(1):7688. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35168-7.
2
Waning Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine Against Infection in Adolescents in Israel.BNT162b2 疫苗对以色列青少年感染的有效性下降。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):113-118. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac315.
3
Effectiveness of an inactivated Covid-19 vaccine with homologous and heterologous boosters against Omicron in Brazil.
Effective cellular and neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after mRNA booster vaccination is associated with pDC and B cell activation.
mRNA加强疫苗接种后对SARS-CoV-2产生有效的细胞免疫和中和免疫与浆细胞样树突状细胞(pDC)和B细胞活化有关。
Front Immunol. 2025 May 12;16:1580448. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1580448. eCollection 2025.
4
Vaccination Strategies: Mixing Paths Versus Matching Tracks.疫苗接种策略:混合路径与匹配轨迹
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;13(3):308. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13030308.
5
T and B cell responses in different immunization scenarios for COVID-19: a narrative review.COVID-19不同免疫方案中的T细胞和B细胞反应:一项叙述性综述
Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 18;16:1535014. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1535014. eCollection 2025.
6
Growing attention of immunogenicity among patients with autoimmune diseases post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: meta-analysis and systematic reviews of the current studies.SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种后自身免疫性疾病患者免疫原性受关注程度增加:当前研究的荟萃分析与系统评价
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2478319. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2478319. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
7
Humoral and cellular immune durability of different COVID-19 vaccine platforms following homologous/heterologous boosters: one-year post vaccination.同源/异源加强接种后不同新冠疫苗平台的体液免疫和细胞免疫持久性:接种后一年
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 22;16:1526444. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1526444. eCollection 2025.
8
Safety and immunogenicity of a modified COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, SYS6006, as a fourth-dose booster following three doses of inactivated vaccines in healthy adults: an open-labeled Phase 1 trial.一种改良型新冠mRNA疫苗SYS6006在健康成年人三剂灭活疫苗接种后作为第四剂加强针的安全性和免疫原性:一项开放标签的1期试验。
Life Metab. 2023 May 10;2(3):load019. doi: 10.1093/lifemeta/load019. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Comparing Antibody Responses to Homologous vs. Heterologous COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in an Urban Bangladeshi Population.比较新冠病毒疫苗同源接种与异源接种后的抗体反应:孟加拉国城市人口的横断面分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;13(1):67. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13010067.
10
COVID-19 Vaccination and Transient Increase in CD4/CD8 Cell Counts in People with HIV: Evidence from China.2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种与HIV感染者CD4/CD8细胞计数的短暂增加:来自中国的证据
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Dec 3;12(12):1365. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12121365.
巴西使用同源和异源加强针的灭活新冠疫苗对奥密克戎的有效性。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 6;13(1):5536. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33169-0.
4
Duration of effectiveness of vaccination against COVID-19 caused by the omicron variant.由奥密克戎变种引起的新冠疫苗接种有效性持续时间。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;22(8):1114-1116. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00409-1. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
5
Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 breakthrough infections in patients with cancer (UKCCEP): a population-based test-negative case-control study.针对癌症患者 COVID-19 突破性感染的疫苗有效性(英国癌症研究中心疫苗评估合作组织):一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jun;23(6):748-757. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00202-9. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Setting.在全国范围内接种第四剂 BNT162b2 mRNA 新冠疫苗。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 28;386(17):1603-1614. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201688. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
Protection by a Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 against Omicron in Israel.在以色列,第四剂 BNT162b2 对奥密克戎的保护作用。
N Engl J Med. 2022 May 5;386(18):1712-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201570. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
8
Effectiveness of CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in Brazil: a test-negative, case-control study.在巴西,既往感染过 SARS-CoV-2 的个体中 CoronaVac、ChAdOx1 nCoV-19、BNT162b2 和 Ad26.COV2.S 的有效性:一项病例对照研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;22(6):791-801. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00140-2. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
9
Effectiveness of Homologous and Heterologous COVID-19 Booster Doses Following 1 Ad.26.COV2.S (Janssen [Johnson & Johnson]) Vaccine Dose Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults - VISION Network, 10 States, December 2021-March 2022.同源和异源 COVID-19 加强针在接种 1 剂 Ad.26.COV2.S(强生[詹森])疫苗后的有效性:成人因 COVID-19 前往急诊和紧急护理就诊和住院的情况 - VISION 网络,10 个州,2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 3 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Apr 1;71(13):495-502. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7113e2.
10
Comparative effectiveness and safety of homologous two-dose ChAdOx1 versus heterologous vaccination with ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2.同源两剂 ChAdOx1 与 ChAdOx1 和 BNT162b2 异源疫苗接种的疗效和安全性比较。
Nat Commun. 2022 Mar 23;13(1):1639. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29301-9.