Early Outcome Analysis of Management of Closed Pelvic Ring Fractures in Emergency: Conservative Versus Surgical at Level III Trauma Center in India.

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic bone fracture is often observed in high-speed road traffic accidents, and forms a medical emergency as it is often complicated with associated internal exsanguination, shock, and mortality. Managing such cases cost-effectively in a developing country with limited assets, without compromising on patient outcomes still remains an obstacle.

OBJECTIVE

To compare and contrast the clinical aftermath of urgent non-surgical and surgical treatment of closed pelvic ring fracture patients and to analyze the types and severity of complications and final functional outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with pelvic fractures received at the casualty of IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, between January 2017 and January 2018 were included in the study. Marvin Tile classification was used to classify the fractures. Analysis and assessment of patients were done preoperatively and at six-month follow-up after management, with radiology and functional score using D'Aubinge-Postel Scale. The mode of injury, various management protocols for each type of fracture pattern, and associated complications were also noted. And finally, an outcome comparison was drawn between surgical and non-surgical options for various fractures. A Chi-square test was used to compare the outcomes.

RESULTS

The functional outcome as per the D'Aubigne-Postel Scale, on average six months, was excellent in nine patients (36%), good in seven (28%), fair in four (16%), and poor in four (16%). The outcome comparison was insignificant statistically in both radiological assessment (p 0.614) and functional scores (p 0.26) between the conservative and surgical outcomes. The average duration of hospital stay, duration to ambulation, duration to full recovery, and complications were significantly more in patients managed conservatively. While the cost of treatment was more in the surgical group. One death was observed in the study group due to septicemia which might have been directly related to the severity of pelvic injury and choice of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Tile's Type B and C fractures, managed surgically allow faster mobilization of the patient and a shorter recovery period while the cost of treatment is significantly more. Tiles type A is best managed conservatively.