Bjorland Line Sagerup, Dæhli Kurz Kathinka, Fluge Øystein, Gilje Bjørnar, Mahesparan Rupavathana, Sætran Hege, Ushakova Anastasia, Farbu Elisabeth
Department of Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory (SMIL), Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Neurooncol Adv. 2022 Jul 1;4(1):vdac102. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac102. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
Butterfly glioblastoma is a rare subgroup of glioblastoma with a bihemispheric tumor crossing the corpus callosum, and is associated with a dismal prognosis. Prognostic factors are previously sparsely described and optimal treatment remains uncertain. We aimed to analyze clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes from butterfly glioblastoma in a real-world setting.
This retrospective population-based cohort study included patients diagnosed with butterfly glioblastoma in Western Norway between 01/01/2007 and 31/12/2014. We enrolled patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma and patients with a diagnosis based on a typical MRI pattern. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. Molecular and MRI volumetric analyses were retrospectively performed. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models.
Among 381 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, 33 patients (8.7%) met the butterfly glioblastoma criteria. Median overall survival was 5.5 months (95% CI 3.1-7.9) and 3-year survival was 9.1%. Hypofractionated radiation therapy with or without temozolomide was the most frequently used treatment strategy, given to 16 of the 27 (59.3%) patients receiving radiation therapy. Best supportive care was associated with poorer survival compared with multimodal treatment [adjusted hazard ratio 5.11 (95% CI 1.09-23.89)].
Outcome from butterfly glioblastoma was dismal, with a median overall survival of less than 6 months. However, long-term survival was comparable to that observed in non-butterfly glioblastoma, and multimodal treatment was associated with longer survival. This suggests that patients with butterfly glioblastoma may benefit from a more aggressive treatment approach despite the overall poor prognosis.
蝶形胶质母细胞瘤是胶质母细胞瘤的一种罕见亚型,肿瘤呈双侧半球性,跨越胼胝体,预后较差。此前对预后因素的描述较少,最佳治疗方案仍不明确。我们旨在分析现实环境中蝶形胶质母细胞瘤的临床特征、治疗策略及预后。
这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究纳入了2007年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间在挪威西部被诊断为蝶形胶质母细胞瘤的患者。我们纳入了组织学确诊为胶质母细胞瘤的患者以及基于典型MRI模式确诊的患者。临床数据从电子病历中提取。回顾性地进行了分子和MRI体积分析。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox比例风险回归模型进行生存分析。
在381例被诊断为胶质母细胞瘤的患者中,33例(8.7%)符合蝶形胶质母细胞瘤标准。中位总生存期为5.5个月(95%CI 3.1-7.9),3年生存率为9.1%。接受放疗的27例患者中有16例(59.3%)采用了有或没有替莫唑胺的低分割放疗,这是最常用的治疗策略。与多模式治疗相比,最佳支持治疗与较差的生存率相关[调整后的风险比为5..11(95%CI 1.09-23.89)]。
蝶形胶质母细胞瘤的预后较差,中位总生存期不到6个月。然而,长期生存率与非蝶形胶质母细胞瘤相当,多模式治疗与更长的生存期相关。这表明,尽管总体预后较差,但蝶形胶质母细胞瘤患者可能从更积极的治疗方法中获益。