• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分裂型矛盾情感量表:项目反应理论分析

The Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale: An Item Response Theory Analysis.

作者信息

Deters Lauren B, Silvia Paul J, Kwapil Thomas R

机构信息

Workera.ai, Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 26170, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;12(8):247. doi: 10.3390/bs12080247.

DOI:10.3390/bs12080247
PMID:35892347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9332178/
Abstract

Ambivalence has a prominent role in the historical formulations of schizotypy and schizophrenia, as well as borderline personality disorder. However, it has been overlooked by our current diagnostic nomenclature. The Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale (SAS) is a 19-item self-report scale developed to examine ambivalence relevant to schizotypy and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Questionnaire, interview, and ambulatory assessment studies support the construct validity of the measure as a predictor of schizophrenia-spectrum and borderline psychopathology. However, studies have not adequately examined the item properties and factor structure of the scale. To examine the psychometric features of the SAS, the present research applied item response theory and differential item functioning methods using a large sample of adults ( = 7096). Analyses of dimensionality were consistent with essential unidimensionality, and a 2PL IRT model found good item discrimination, an appropriate range of item difficulty, minimal local dependence, and excellent item fit. Analyses of differential item functioning found essentially no bias for gender on any items and very small effects for two items for racial/ethnic identity. Overall, the analyses reveal many psychometric strengths of the Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale and support its use a single-factor instrument for assessing ambivalence in diverse subgroups of adults.

摘要

矛盾情感在分裂型人格障碍、精神分裂症以及边缘型人格障碍的历史表述中扮演着重要角色。然而,它却被我们当前的诊断术语所忽视。分裂型矛盾情感量表(SAS)是一个包含19个条目的自陈量表,旨在检验与分裂型人格障碍及精神分裂症谱系障碍相关的矛盾情感。问卷调查、访谈及动态评估研究均支持该量表作为精神分裂症谱系障碍和边缘型精神病理学预测指标的结构效度。然而,此前的研究尚未充分检验该量表的条目属性和因子结构。为了检验SAS的心理测量学特征,本研究运用项目反应理论和差异项目功能分析方法,对一个包含7096名成年人的大样本进行了分析。维度分析结果与本质单维性一致,一个二参数逻辑斯蒂项目反应理论模型显示出良好的项目区分度、适当的项目难度范围、最小的局部依赖性以及出色的项目拟合度。差异项目功能分析发现,任何条目在性别上基本不存在偏差,在种族/民族身份方面,仅有两个条目存在非常小的影响。总体而言,这些分析揭示了分裂型矛盾情感量表诸多心理测量学优势,并支持将其作为一种单因素工具用于评估不同成年亚组中的矛盾情感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/7b2e1c4eed8f/behavsci-12-00247-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/7a93b24ae5a8/behavsci-12-00247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/75d56b2fd81d/behavsci-12-00247-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/4f409b76bd6e/behavsci-12-00247-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/c13aaaffd0d5/behavsci-12-00247-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/7b2e1c4eed8f/behavsci-12-00247-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/7a93b24ae5a8/behavsci-12-00247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/75d56b2fd81d/behavsci-12-00247-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/4f409b76bd6e/behavsci-12-00247-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/c13aaaffd0d5/behavsci-12-00247-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdbc/9332178/7b2e1c4eed8f/behavsci-12-00247-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale: An Item Response Theory Analysis.分裂型矛盾情感量表:项目反应理论分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;12(8):247. doi: 10.3390/bs12080247.
2
Psychometric properties and concurrent validity of the schizotypal ambivalence scale.分裂型矛盾情感量表的心理测量特性及同时效度
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002 May;190(5):290-5. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200205000-00004.
3
The schizotypal ambivalence scale as a marker of schizotypy.分裂型矛盾情感量表作为分裂型人格特质的一个指标。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 May;196(5):399-404. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181710900.
4
Conceptualizing schizotypal ambivalence: factor structure and its relationships.概念化分裂型矛盾情感:因素结构及其关系
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 Nov;202(11):793-801. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000196.
5
[Psychometric properties of the French versions of the Cognitive Slippage Scale and Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale in 340 subjects].[340名受试者中认知失误量表和分裂型矛盾情感量表法语版本的心理测量特性]
Encephale. 2007 May-Jun;33(3 Pt 1):249-55. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)92036-9.
6
Examining measures of schizotypy for gender and racial bias using item response theory and differential item functioning.运用项目反应理论和项目区分功能考察精神分裂症特质的性别和种族偏见测量指标。
Schizophr Res. 2024 Oct;272:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.08.015. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
7
Development and psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale: A new measure for assessing positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy.多维精神分裂症量表的编制及心理计量学特性:一种用于评估正性、负性和瓦解性精神分裂症特质的新工具。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
[Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief - Likert format: Factor structure analysis in general population in France].[分裂型人格问卷简版 - 李克特量表格式:法国普通人群中的因素结构分析]
Encephale. 2017 Dec;43(6):558-563. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
9
The association of multidimensional schizotypy with symptoms and impairment across racial groups.跨种族群体中多维精神分裂症型人格特质与症状及损害之间的关联。
Personal Ment Health. 2022 Feb;16(1):79-89. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1528. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
10
Schizotypal personality questionnaire--brief revised (updated): An update of norms, factor structure, and item content in a large non-clinical young adult sample.分裂型人格问卷——简短修订版(更新版):大型非临床青年成人样本中常模、因素结构及项目内容的更新
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Apr 30;238:345-355. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.053. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Time to Renovate the Humor Styles Questionnaire? An Item Response Theory Analysis of the HSQ.是时候更新幽默风格问卷了?对幽默风格问卷的项目反应理论分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Nov 13;10(11):173. doi: 10.3390/bs10110173.
2
Positive, Negative, and Disorganized Schizotypy Predict Differential Patterns of Interview-Rated Schizophrenia-Spectrum Symptoms and Impairment.阳性、阴性和紊乱型精神分裂症特质预测访谈评定的精神分裂症谱系症状和损害的不同模式。
Assessment. 2021 Jan;28(1):141-152. doi: 10.1177/1073191119900008. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
3
Critical Values for Yen's : Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations.
严氏临界值:使用残差相关性识别拉施模型中的局部依赖性
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):178-194. doi: 10.1177/0146621616677520. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
4
The multidimensional schizotypy scale-brief: Scale development and psychometric properties.多维精神分裂症量表-简式:量表编制与心理测量学特性。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.033. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Development and psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale: A new measure for assessing positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy.多维精神分裂症量表的编制及心理计量学特性:一种用于评估正性、负性和瓦解性精神分裂症特质的新工具。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
The assessment of schizotypy and its clinical relevance.精神分裂症样人格特质的评估及其临床相关性。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S374-85. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu194.
7
Schizotypy: looking back and moving forward.分裂型人格特质:回顾与展望。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S366-73. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu186. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
8
Conceptualizing schizotypal ambivalence: factor structure and its relationships.概念化分裂型矛盾情感:因素结构及其关系
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 Nov;202(11):793-801. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000196.
9
Criterion validity of the cognitive slippage and schizotypal ambivalence scales.认知失误和分裂型矛盾量表的效标效度。
Psychol Rep. 2013 Dec;113(3):930-4. doi: 10.2466/02.19.PR0.113x27z5.
10
Properties of Rasch residual fit statistics.拉施残差拟合统计量的性质。
J Appl Meas. 2013;14(4):339-55.