Deters Lauren B, Silvia Paul J, Kwapil Thomas R
Workera.ai, Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 26170, USA.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;12(8):247. doi: 10.3390/bs12080247.
Ambivalence has a prominent role in the historical formulations of schizotypy and schizophrenia, as well as borderline personality disorder. However, it has been overlooked by our current diagnostic nomenclature. The Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale (SAS) is a 19-item self-report scale developed to examine ambivalence relevant to schizotypy and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Questionnaire, interview, and ambulatory assessment studies support the construct validity of the measure as a predictor of schizophrenia-spectrum and borderline psychopathology. However, studies have not adequately examined the item properties and factor structure of the scale. To examine the psychometric features of the SAS, the present research applied item response theory and differential item functioning methods using a large sample of adults ( = 7096). Analyses of dimensionality were consistent with essential unidimensionality, and a 2PL IRT model found good item discrimination, an appropriate range of item difficulty, minimal local dependence, and excellent item fit. Analyses of differential item functioning found essentially no bias for gender on any items and very small effects for two items for racial/ethnic identity. Overall, the analyses reveal many psychometric strengths of the Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale and support its use a single-factor instrument for assessing ambivalence in diverse subgroups of adults.
矛盾情感在分裂型人格障碍、精神分裂症以及边缘型人格障碍的历史表述中扮演着重要角色。然而,它却被我们当前的诊断术语所忽视。分裂型矛盾情感量表(SAS)是一个包含19个条目的自陈量表,旨在检验与分裂型人格障碍及精神分裂症谱系障碍相关的矛盾情感。问卷调查、访谈及动态评估研究均支持该量表作为精神分裂症谱系障碍和边缘型精神病理学预测指标的结构效度。然而,此前的研究尚未充分检验该量表的条目属性和因子结构。为了检验SAS的心理测量学特征,本研究运用项目反应理论和差异项目功能分析方法,对一个包含7096名成年人的大样本进行了分析。维度分析结果与本质单维性一致,一个二参数逻辑斯蒂项目反应理论模型显示出良好的项目区分度、适当的项目难度范围、最小的局部依赖性以及出色的项目拟合度。差异项目功能分析发现,任何条目在性别上基本不存在偏差,在种族/民族身份方面,仅有两个条目存在非常小的影响。总体而言,这些分析揭示了分裂型矛盾情感量表诸多心理测量学优势,并支持将其作为一种单因素工具用于评估不同成年亚组中的矛盾情感。