Sontag Marci K, Miller Joshua I, McKasson Sarah, Gaviglio Amy, Martiniano Stacey L, West Rhonda, Vazquez Marisol, Ren Clement L, Farrell Philip M, McColley Susanna A, Kellar-Guenther Yvonne
Center for Public Health Innovation at CI International, Littleton, CO 80120, USA.
Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022 Jun 23;8(3):38. doi: 10.3390/ijns8030038.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) was universally adopted in 2009 in the United States. Variations in NBS practices between states may impact the timing of diagnosis and intervention. Quantitative metrics can provide insight into NBS programs (NBSP), but the nuances cannot be elucidated without additional feedback from programs. This study was designed to determine facilitators and barriers to timely diagnosis and intervention following NBS for CF. The median age at the first CF event for infants with CF within each state was used to define early and late states ( = 15 per group); multiple CF centers were invited in states with more than two CF centers. Thirty states were eligible, and 61 NBSP and CF centers were invited to participate in structured interviews to determine facilitators and barriers. Once saturation of themes was reached, no other interviews were conducted. Forty-five interviews were conducted ( = 16 early CF center, = 12 late CF center, = 11 early NBSP, and = 6 late NBSP). Most interviewees reported good communication between CF centers and NBSP. Communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and families was identified as a challenge, leading to delays in referral and subsequent diagnosis. The misperception of low clinical risk in infants from racial and ethnic minority groups was a barrier to early diagnostic evaluation for all groups. NBSP and CF centers have strong relationships. Early diagnosis may be facilitated through more engagement with PCPs. Quality improvement initiatives should focus on continuing strong partnerships between CF centers and NBS programs, improving education, communication strategies, and partnerships with PCPs, and improving CF NBS timeliness and accuracy.
2009年,囊性纤维化(CF)新生儿筛查(NBS)在美国被普遍采用。各州NBS实践的差异可能会影响诊断和干预的时机。定量指标可以为NBS项目(NBSP)提供见解,但如果没有项目提供的额外反馈,细微差别就无法阐明。本研究旨在确定CF新生儿筛查后及时诊断和干预的促进因素和障碍。每个州CF患儿首次出现CF事件的中位年龄用于定义早期和晚期状态(每组 = 15个);在拥有两个以上CF中心的州邀请了多个CF中心。30个州符合条件,61个NBSP和CF中心被邀请参加结构化访谈,以确定促进因素和障碍。一旦主题达到饱和,就不再进行其他访谈。共进行了45次访谈( = 16个早期CF中心, = 12个晚期CF中心, = 11个早期NBSP, = 6个晚期NBSP)。大多数受访者报告称CF中心和NBSP之间沟通良好。初级保健提供者(PCP)与家庭之间的沟通被认为是一个挑战,导致转诊和后续诊断延迟。种族和少数民族婴儿临床风险低的错误认知是所有群体早期诊断评估的障碍。NBSP和CF中心关系密切。通过更多地与PCP合作,可能有助于早期诊断。质量改进举措应侧重于继续加强CF中心与NBS项目之间的紧密伙伴关系,改善教育、沟通策略以及与PCP的伙伴关系,提高CF NBS的及时性和准确性。