Madden Kellyn, Mueller Rebecca, Brown Camille, Valverde Kathleen D, Langfelder-Schwind Elinor
Master of Science in Genetic Counseling Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance, Downingtown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jan;60(1):e27449. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27449. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) was universally implemented in the United States in 2010 to improve disease outcomes. Despite universal screening, disparities in outcomes currently exist between people with CF (PwCF) with Black/African, Asian, Indigenous, and Latino/Hispanic ancestry in comparison to PwCF of European ancestry. This is in part because CFTR panels used for newborn screening are often based on variants common in European ancestries leading to higher rates of false negatives for PwCF from minoritized racial and ethnic groups.
This study investigated how states evaluate and update their CFNBS algorithms through semi-structured interviews with professionals from four states with ethnically diverse populations and one national consultant. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through inductive thematic analysis.
Five themes were identified encompassing facilitators, barriers, and motivations for evaluating and updating CF NBS algorithms. Facilitators of effective evaluation and updating of algorithms included effective communication with CF clinical centers and extensive support for CF as compared to other conditions. Although participants stated that their respective NBS programs were aware of the disparate impact of their CF panels on PwCF from minoritized racial and ethnic groups, motivations to decrease this disparity were hampered by a range of funding and logistical barriers, such as limited information about false negative cases and difficulties incorporating next generation sequencing technology.
This study shed light on the experiences of states considering alterations to their CFNBS panels, revealing several key barriers and facilitators to implementing equitable CFNBS algorithms.
2010年,美国全面实施了针对囊性纤维化(CF)的新生儿筛查(NBS),以改善疾病预后。尽管进行了全面筛查,但与欧洲血统的CF患者相比,目前患有CF的黑人/非洲人、亚洲人、原住民和拉丁裔/西班牙裔血统患者在疾病预后方面仍存在差异。部分原因是用于新生儿筛查的CFTR检测板通常基于欧洲血统中常见的变异,导致少数种族和族裔群体的CF患者假阴性率较高。
本研究通过对来自四个具有不同种族人口的州的专业人员和一名国家顾问进行半结构化访谈,调查了各州如何评估和更新其CFNBS算法。访谈内容逐字记录,并通过归纳主题分析进行分析。
确定了五个主题,涵盖评估和更新CF NBS算法的促进因素、障碍和动机。有效评估和更新算法的促进因素包括与CF临床中心的有效沟通以及与其他疾病相比对CF的广泛支持。尽管参与者表示,他们各自的NBS项目意识到其CF检测板对少数种族和族裔群体的CF患者有不同影响,但减少这种差异的动机受到一系列资金和后勤障碍的阻碍,如关于假阴性病例的信息有限以及纳入下一代测序技术的困难。
本研究揭示了各州在考虑改变其CFNBS检测板方面的经验,揭示了实施公平的CFNBS算法的几个关键障碍和促进因素。