• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动监测后根治性前列腺切除术中的不良病理结果:Movember GAP3队列研究结果

Adverse Pathological Findings at Radical Prostatectomy following Active Surveillance: Results from the Movember GAP3 Cohort.

作者信息

Marenghi Cristina, Qiu Zhuyu, Helleman Jozien, Nieboer Daan, Rubio-Briones Josè, Carroll Peter R, Lee Lui Shiong, Valdagni Riccardo, Boutros Paul C, Nicolai Nicola

机构信息

Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Department of Human Genetics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;14(15):3558. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153558.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14153558
PMID:35892817
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9332009/
Abstract

Background: Little is known about the consequences of delaying radical prostatectomy (RP) after Active Surveillance (AS) according to stringent or wider entry criteria. We investigated the association between inclusion criteria and rates, and timing of adverse pathological findings (APFs) among patients in GAP3 cohorts. Methods: APFs (GG ≥ 3, pT ≥ 3, pN > 0 and positive surgical margins [R1]) were accounted for in very low-risk (VLR: grade group [GG] 1, cT1, positive cores < 3, PSA < 10 ng/mL, PSA density [PSAD] < 0.15 ng/mL/cm3) and low-risk (LR: GG1, cT1-2, PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL) patients undergoing subsequent RP. The Kaplan−Meier method and log−rank test analyzed APF-free survival. Stratified mixed effects models analyzed association. Results: Out of 21,169 patients on AS, 1742 (VLR: 721; LR: 1021) underwent delayed RP. Most (60.8%) did not have APFs. APFs occurred more frequently (44.6% vs. 31.7%; OR 1.54, p < 0.001) and earlier (median time: 40.3 vs. 62.6 months; p < 0.001) in LR patients, and consisted of pT ≥ 3 (OR 1.47, p = 0.013) or R1 (OR 1.80, p < 0.001), but not of GG ≥ 3 or node involvement. Age (OR 1.05, p < 0.001), PSAD (OR 23.21, p = 0.003), and number of positive cores (OR 1.16, p = 0.004) were independently associated with APFs. Conclusions: AS stands as a safe option for low-risk patients, and most do not have APFs at surgery. Wider entry criteria are associated with pT3 and R1. The prognostic implications remain uncertain.

摘要

背景

对于根据严格或更宽松的纳入标准在主动监测(AS)后延迟进行根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的后果知之甚少。我们调查了GAP3队列中患者的纳入标准与不良病理结果(APF)的发生率及时间之间的关联。方法:在接受后续RP的极低风险(VLR:分级组[GG]1,cT1,阳性核心<3,PSA<10 ng/mL,PSA密度[PSAD]<0.15 ng/mL/cm³)和低风险(LR:GG1,cT1 - 2,PSA≤10 ng/mL)患者中,对APF(GG≥3,pT≥3,pN>0和手术切缘阳性[R1])进行统计。采用Kaplan - Meier方法和对数秩检验分析无APF生存期。分层混合效应模型分析关联。结果:在21169例接受AS的患者中,1742例(VLR:721例;LR:1021例)接受了延迟RP。大多数(60.8%)没有APF。LR患者中APF出现得更频繁(44.6%对31.7%;OR 1.54,p<0.001)且更早(中位时间:40.3对62.6个月;p<0.001),并且包括pT≥3(OR 1.47,p = 0.013)或R1(OR 1.80,p<0.001),但不包括GG≥3或淋巴结受累。年龄(OR 1.05,p<0.001)、PSAD(OR 23.21,p = 0.003)和阳性核心数量(OR 1.16,p = 0.004)与APF独立相关。结论:AS对低风险患者是一种安全的选择,并且大多数患者在手术时没有APF。更宽松的纳入标准与pT3和R1相关。其预后意义仍不确定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a06/9332009/b8963fc817be/cancers-14-03558-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a06/9332009/b8963fc817be/cancers-14-03558-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a06/9332009/b8963fc817be/cancers-14-03558-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Adverse Pathological Findings at Radical Prostatectomy following Active Surveillance: Results from the Movember GAP3 Cohort.主动监测后根治性前列腺切除术中的不良病理结果:Movember GAP3队列研究结果
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;14(15):3558. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153558.
2
Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.男性行即刻根治性前列腺切除术的不良病理发现:定义一个有利的中危风险组。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):89-92. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1879.
3
The prognostic value of digital rectal exam for the existence of advanced pathologic features after prostatectomy.前列腺切除术后直肠指检对高级别病理特征存在情况的预后价值。
Prostate. 2021 Oct;81(14):1064-1070. doi: 10.1002/pros.24203. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
4
Role of Metabolic Syndrome on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy in a Low-risk Prostate Cancer Cohort Potentially Eligible for Active Surveillance.代谢综合征对潜在适合主动监测的低危前列腺癌队列行根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结局的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 May;5(3):425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.12.005. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
5
Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer with PSA 10-20 ng/mL: pathological outcome analysis of a population-level database.PSA 在 10-20ng/mL 之间的中危前列腺癌的主动监测:人群水平数据库的病理结果分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Apr;25(4):690-693. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00448-8. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
6
Delayed radical prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance is not associated with the use of secondary treatments compared with immediate prostatectomy.与即刻前列腺切除术相比,主动监测一段时间后行延迟根治性前列腺切除术与二次治疗的使用无关。
Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):323-329. doi: 10.1002/pros.24277. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
Association of Age With Risk of Adverse Pathological Findings in Men Undergoing Delayed Radical Prostatectomy Following Active Surveillance.主动监测后延迟行根治性前列腺切除术的男性中年龄与不良病理发现风险的相关性。
Urology. 2021 Sep;155:91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.044. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
8
Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.基于达米科分类的低风险前列腺癌的异质性:根据主动监测资格在升级和分期进展方面的差异。
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jul;33(7):329.e13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Pathologic outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer after delayed radical prostatectomy in the United States.美国低风险前列腺癌延迟根治性前列腺切除术后的病理结果
Urol Oncol. 2015 Apr;33(4):164.e11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
10
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度预测初始前列腺活检和前列腺切除术中 Gleason 评分升级的能力随着肿瘤分级的增加而降低,这是由于单位肿瘤体积的 PSA 分泌减少所致。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Patients Treated with Active Surveillance.接受主动监测的侵袭性前列腺癌患者。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;15(17):4270. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174270.

本文引用的文献

1
The Natural History of Untreated Biopsy Grade Group Progression and Delayed Definitive Treatment for Men on Active Surveillance for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.未经治疗的活检分级分组进展的自然史和早期前列腺癌主动监测患者延迟确定性治疗。
J Urol. 2022 May;207(5):1001-1009. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002420. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
2
Risk of adverse pathology at prostatectomy in the era of MRI and targeted biopsies; rethinking active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer patients.在 MRI 和靶向活检时代前列腺切除术的不良病理风险;重新思考中危前列腺癌患者的主动监测。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;39(10):729.e1-729.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.
《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Systematic Review of Time to Definitive Treatment for Intermediate Risk and High Risk Prostate Cancer: Are Delays Associated with Worse Outcomes?系统评价:中危和高危前列腺癌的确定性治疗时间:延迟是否与预后更差相关?
J Urol. 2021 May;205(5):1263-1274. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001601. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
5
Upgrading on radical prostatectomy specimens of very low- and low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: A population-level analysis.主动监测下极低风险和低风险前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术标本的升级:一项基于人群水平的分析。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Jul;15(7):E335-E339. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6868.
6
Long-term outcomes of active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer in a community-based setting: results from a prospective non-interventional study.在社区环境下对局限性前列腺癌进行主动监测的长期结果:一项前瞻性非干预性研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2515-2523. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03471-x. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Incorporating Prognostic Biomarkers into Risk Assessment Models and TNM Staging for Prostate Cancer.将预后生物标志物纳入前列腺癌风险评估模型和 TNM 分期。
Cells. 2020 Sep 17;9(9):2116. doi: 10.3390/cells9092116.
8
Predictors of adverse pathology on radical prostatectomy specimen in men initially enrolled in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.在最初接受低危前列腺癌主动监测的男性中,预测根治性前列腺切除术后标本中出现不良病理的因素。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):1797-1804. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03394-7. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
9
Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与局限性前列腺癌的延迟治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3.
10
Radical Prostatectomy or Observation for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Extended Follow-up of the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT).根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待对局限性前列腺癌的疗效:前列腺癌干预与观察试验(PIVOT)的长期随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):713-724. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 21.