• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂思维的特征:对教育中一个颠覆性概念的文献计量学综述。

Traits of Complex Thinking: A Bibliometric Review of a Disruptive Construct in Education.

作者信息

Baena-Rojas Jose Jaime, Ramírez-Montoya María Soledad, Mazo-Cuervo Diego Mauricio, López-Caudana Edgar Omar

机构信息

Institute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.

Fundación Universitaria CEIPA, Sabaneta 055450, Colombia.

出版信息

J Intell. 2022 Jun 30;10(3):37. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030037.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence10030037
PMID:35893268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9326623/
Abstract

The purpose of this research is to contextualize the behavior of publications on complex thinking in education. A total of 428 documents compiled in Scopus from 1937 to 2022 were analyzed with a bibliometric study considering criteria such as "complex thinking", "complex thought", and "reasoning for complexity", all combined with education. The results show 153, 47, and 5 publications for each criterion with their related disciplines, citations, types of documents, universities, prominent authors, researching countries, and the general diachronic evolution of the subject, this allows to establish an idea about the implications of the present study according to one of the most important databases in the world. It is concluded that complex thinking and its relationship with education awakens a greater interest in the academy, not only because of its incidence in diverse fields that are nourished by it for the generation of new multidisciplinary knowledge but also because of the published research that demonstrates its transcendence.

摘要

本研究的目的是将教育领域中关于复杂思维的出版物行为置于特定背景中。通过文献计量研究,对1937年至2022年在Scopus中汇编的总共428份文档进行了分析,该研究考虑了“复杂思维”、“复杂思想”和“复杂性推理”等标准,所有这些标准都与教育相结合。结果显示,每个标准分别有153、47和5篇出版物,以及它们的相关学科、引用次数、文献类型、大学、杰出作者、研究国家,以及该主题的总体历时演变情况,这有助于根据世界上最重要的数据库之一对本研究的意义形成一个概念。得出的结论是,复杂思维及其与教育的关系在学术界引起了更大的兴趣,这不仅是因为它在众多领域中的影响,这些领域因它而受益,从而产生了新的多学科知识,还因为已发表的研究证明了它的卓越性。

相似文献

1
Traits of Complex Thinking: A Bibliometric Review of a Disruptive Construct in Education.复杂思维的特征:对教育中一个颠覆性概念的文献计量学综述。
J Intell. 2022 Jun 30;10(3):37. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030037.
2
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases.使用PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行文献计量分析的比较
J Vis Exp. 2019 Oct 24(152). doi: 10.3791/58494.
3
Bibliometric analysis of literature in pharmacy education: 2000-2016.2000 - 2016年药学教育文献的文献计量分析
Int J Pharm Pract. 2018 Dec;26(6):541-549. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12429. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Nursing and midwifery research activity in Arab countries from 1950 to 2017.1950年至2017年阿拉伯国家的护理与助产研究活动。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 28;19(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4178-y.
5
Sleep Disorders Research From 1945 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis.1945 年至 2020 年睡眠障碍研究:文献计量分析。
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2021;20(7):574-593. doi: 10.2174/1871527320666210218085341.
6
A bibliometric analysis of paramedicine publications using the Scopus database: 2010-2019.运用 Scopus 数据库对 2010-2019 年的急救医学文献进行的文献计量分析。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Nov;59:101077. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101077. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis.全球电子烟领域的研究生产力:一项文献计量分析。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 30;14:667. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-667.
8
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).尿道下裂(1945 - 2013年)领域被引用次数排名前150的论文的比较文献计量分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
9
[Bibliometric analysis of publications in Gastroenterology and Hepatology in Spain from 2000 to 2009].[2000年至2009年西班牙胃肠病学与肝病学领域出版物的文献计量分析]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Oct;35(8):551-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
10
Substandard and falsified medical products: bibliometric analysis and mapping of scientific research.不合格和伪造的医疗产品:科学研究的文献计量分析和绘制图谱。
Global Health. 2021 Sep 23;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00766-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of the Level of Competency of Candidates for Graduation: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Complex Thinking.对毕业候选人能力水平的认知:一种复杂思维的多学科方法。
J Intell. 2023 Oct 20;11(10):202. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11100202.
2
Low limb prostheses and complex human prosthetic interaction: A systematic literature review.下肢假肢与复杂的人体假肢交互作用:一项系统文献综述。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Feb 13;10:1032748. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1032748. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the value of research data: a citation analysis of oceanographic data sets.衡量研究数据的价值:海洋学数据集的引文分析
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092590. eCollection 2014.
2
Simulation for clinical research trials: a theoretical outline.临床研究试验模拟:理论概述。
J Crit Care. 2009 Jun;24(2):164-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
3
Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.文献计量学方法:陷阱与可能性
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 Nov;97(5):261-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x.
4
Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students.种族多样性对大学生复杂思维的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):507-10. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00710.x.
5
Personality, stress and the decision to commence cigarette smoking in adolescence.个性、压力与青少年开始吸烟的决定
J Psychosom Res. 1995 Jan;39(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00074-f.
6
Management of bulbar symptoms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.肌萎缩侧索硬化症延髓症状的管理
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1987;209:201-21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5302-7_32.