Okazaki Mikio, Shien Kazuhiko, Suzawa Ken, Sugimoto Seiichiro, Toyooka Shinichi
Department of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan.
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 22;12(8):1195. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081195.
This study aimed to determine the optimal position and port placement during robotic resection for various mediastinal tumors. For anterior mediastinal tumors, total or extended thymectomy is commonly performed in the supine position using the lateral or subxiphoid approach. Although it is unclear which approach is better during robotic thymectomy, technical advantages of subxiphoid approach are beneficial for patients with myasthenia who require extended thymectomy. Partial thymectomy is performed in the supine position using a lateral approach. Superior, middle, and posterior mediastinal tumors are resected in the decubitus position using the lateral approach, whereas dumbbell tumor resection, which requires a posterior approach, can be performed in the prone position. The position and port placement should be chosen depending on the size, location, and aggressiveness of the tumor. In this study, we describe how to choose which of these different robotic approaches can be used based on our experience and previous reports.
本研究旨在确定机器人辅助切除各种纵隔肿瘤时的最佳体位和端口放置位置。对于前纵隔肿瘤,通常采用仰卧位,经侧方或剑突下入路进行全胸腺切除术或扩大胸腺切除术。虽然机器人辅助胸腺切除术中哪种入路更好尚不清楚,但剑突下入路的技术优势对需要扩大胸腺切除术的重症肌无力患者有益。部分胸腺切除术采用仰卧位经侧方入路进行。上、中、后纵隔肿瘤采用侧卧位经侧方入路切除,而需要后入路的哑铃形肿瘤切除可采用俯卧位进行。体位和端口放置应根据肿瘤的大小、位置和侵袭性来选择。在本研究中,我们根据我们的经验和既往报道描述如何选择使用这些不同的机器人辅助入路。