Suppr超能文献

使用AQUA CEL和M22设备对睑板腺功能障碍患者进行强脉冲光治疗的比较。

Comparison of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy on Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Using AQUA CEL and M22 Devices.

作者信息

Fukuoka Shima, Arita Reiko

机构信息

Lid and Meibomian Gland Working Group (LIME), 626-11 Minami-Nakano, Minumaku, Saitama 337-0042, Japan.

Omiya Hamada Eye Clinic, 1-169-1 Sakuragicho, Omiyaku, Saitama 330-0854, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 22;11(15):4265. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154265.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) using the new AQUA CEL (AC, Jeisys) device and the traditional M22 (Lumenis) device. A total of 59 eyes of 59 patients with MGD (12 men and 47 women, mean age 49 ± 12 years) were enrolled. They randomly received four sessions of IPL therapy every three weeks either with AC (30 eyes) or M22 (29 eyes). Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire score, noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT), lid margin abnormalities, corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining, fluorescein breakup time (FBUT), Schirmer’s test, meiboscore and meibum grade were evaluated before treatment and one month after treatment. Before IPL, no significant differences were seen in age, gender, or measured parameters between the AC and M22 groups (p > 0.05, respectively). SPEED score, NIBUT, lid margin abnormalities, fluorescein staining, FBUT, and meibum grade improved significantly in both groups after IPL compared to before IPL (p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in measured parameters between the two groups after IPL (p > 0.05, respectively). IPL therapy with AC and M22 devices has been shown to be equally effective for the treatment of MGD.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较使用新型AQUA CEL(AC,Jeisys)设备和传统M22(Lumenis)设备进行强脉冲光(IPL)治疗睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)的疗效。共纳入59例MGD患者的59只眼(男性12例,女性47例,平均年龄49±12岁)。他们每三周随机接受四次IPL治疗,其中30只眼使用AC设备,29只眼使用M22设备。在治疗前和治疗后1个月评估干眼标准患者评估(SPEED)问卷评分、非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)、睑缘异常、角膜和结膜荧光素染色、荧光素泪膜破裂时间(FBUT)、泪液分泌试验、睑板腺评分和睑脂等级。在进行IPL治疗前,AC组和M22组在年龄、性别或测量参数方面均无显著差异(p均>0.05)。与IPL治疗前相比,两组在IPL治疗后SPEED评分、NIBUT、睑缘异常、荧光素染色、FBUT和睑脂等级均有显著改善(p均<0.001)。两组在IPL治疗后的测量参数方面无显著差异(p均>0.05)。已证明使用AC和M22设备进行IPL治疗对MGD的治疗同样有效。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验